Ellen Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr, Farber. There is room here for a different cause/effect analysis. I
posit that if ICANN fails, it will be an indicator that the ICANN *model*
was not workable, NOT that the Net cannot manage itself. The model that is
the source of so much controversy
At 10:30 AM 9/11/99 -0700, you wrote:
Ellen Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr, Farber. There is room here for a different cause/effect analysis. I
posit that if ICANN fails, it will be an indicator that the ICANN *model*
was not workable, NOT that the Net cannot manage itself. The model that
M
Subject: [IFWP] Re: November Cook Report - intro and part 1 ISOC's critical
rolein enabling ICANN
Ellen Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr, Farber. There is room here for a different cause/effect analysis. I
posit that if ICANN fails, it will be an indicator that the ICANN
*model
Richard, Ellen and all,
As Ellen indicates, and I think correctly, governments can intervene
at nearly any juncture in any effort of self regulation and influence or
force their will upon the process. The GAC was set up primarily
by the ICANN (Initial?) Interim board to circumvent this
Gordon,
My only comment is I wish the "unindicted conspirators" were as
devious and organized as you claim. My experience is that they were
not and still are not. I just don't believe that the ICANN Board (nor
did the ITAG or the ISOC Board) meets in private to plot the takeover
of the
