Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-23 Thread Richard J. Sexton
At 06:41 PM 8/22/99 -0800, you wrote: Jeff Mason wrote: I dont dispute what you have said. That is not the issue. It is the right to be anonymous and participate as a viewer. You can can be an anonymous listener with Real Audio. It's cross-platform, works for both Windows and Macs, and the

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 /Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Ellen Rony
Jeff Mason wrote: As I expected there are no gurantees. The issue is not weither the Berkman Center is composed of angels - or fruits aging in fine wine, it is privacy, a right granted to democratic societies. Remote online participation should approximate physical participation in Santiago

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ellen Rony wrote: Jeff Mason wrote: As I expected there are no gurantees. The issue is not weither the Berkman Center is composed of angels - or fruits aging in fine wine, it is privacy, a right granted to democratic societies. Remote online participation should

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Jeff Williams
Jeff M, and all, I agree with you here Jeff. Ellen did not really address the context of the discussion on this thread in her response. Her point however, is of course correct, as stated and as you pointed out... Planet Communications Computing Facility wrote: On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ellen

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 /Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Ellen Rony
Jeff Mason wrote: I dont dispute what you have said. That is not the issue. It is the right to be anonymous and participate as a viewer. You can can be an anonymous listener with Real Audio. It's cross-platform, works for both Windows and Macs, and the software is free, available for

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Planet Communications Computing Facility
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ellen Rony wrote: Jeff Mason wrote: I dont dispute what you have said. That is not the issue. It is the right to be anonymous and participate as a viewer. You can can be an anonymous listener with Real Audio. It's cross-platform, works for both Windows and

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Patrick Greenwell
On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ellen Rony wrote: Jeff Mason wrote: As I expected there are no gurantees. The issue is not weither the Berkman Center is composed of angels - or fruits aging in fine wine, it is privacy, a right granted to democratic societies. Remote online participation should

Re: [IFWP] Re: Re[2]: [IDNO-DISCUSS] icann.edleman.19990819 / Access to ICANN S

1999-08-22 Thread Jeff Williams
Patrick and all, I guess I am at a loss as the how I fit into Ellen's comment in respect to your reply here Patrick How do you figure? I have not problem with providing and or stating my identity, it is right there in my sig file So where is the concern you seem to be intimating