Monday, August 23, 1999, 8:05:32 AM, Jay Fenello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:06 PM 8/22/99 , Antony Van Couvering wrote:
>>Jay,
>>
>>Um, haven't you realized that very few people care about this stuff very
>>much?
> Hi Antony,
> I've realized that very few people are even
> *aware* o
At 04:06 PM 8/22/99 , Antony Van Couvering wrote:
>Jay,
>
>Um, haven't you realized that very few people care about this stuff very
>much?
Hi Antony,
I've realized that very few people are even
*aware* of this stuff due to a media blackout
that has effectively prevented people from
learnin
At 08:36 PM 8/16/99 , TOM GABLE wrote:
>
>At 01:43 PM 08/16/1999 -0400, Jay Fenello wrote:
>>It's been exactly one month since I first went
>>public with my suspicions that the media was
>>suppressing the story about ICANN.
>
>>First, I reported how one of the most biased
>>news sources in the ICA
Gordon,
> whew. kerry, I generally think you remarks are pretty
> reasonable but isn't jay damned if he does and damned if he
> doesn't by your remarks about we hear that the story is so
> complex that most editors won't touch it, yet when jay pares it
> down to its essentials you come
Ellen and all,
I agree that the article that Ellen is pointing out is indeed
"unbiased and intelligent summary", as far as it goes. However I
believe that Jays point is that
sense this article or the Congressional hearings "ICANN out of control"
the media has been conspicuously quiet.
One of
Jay and others:
Please forgive me if you have already posted and/or read this article, but
I think it presents an unbiased and intelligent summary of ICANN's current
state of affairs
http://www.zdnet.com/zdnn/stories/news/0,4586,2294893-2,00.html
The trouble with ICANN, by Todd Spangler (Inter@c
At 07:12 PM 8/16/99 , Kerry Miller wrote:
>
>> Complexity, confusion, etc. can't possibly
>> explain the media blackout on ICANN!
>
>Maybe not, but if I were an editor, simplistic political concepts,
>such as identifying concern for anything but neoliberal economics
>as Socialism, would rather
> > Complexity, confusion, etc. can't possibly
> > explain the media blackout on ICANN!
> >
>
>Maybe not, but if I were an editor, simplistic political concepts,
>such as identifying concern for anything but neoliberal economics
>as Socialism, would rather put me off publishing your piece. Good
>
> Complexity, confusion, etc. can't possibly
> explain the media blackout on ICANN!
>
Maybe not, but if I were an editor, simplistic political concepts,
such as identifying concern for anything but neoliberal economics
as Socialism, would rather put me off publishing your piece. Good
judge
