At 04:58 PM 12/2/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Andrew McLaughlin wrote (to the ICANN-announce list):
>
> >ICANN is actively seeking expressions of interest from individuals who would
> >like to volunteer to serve as members of ICANN's Membership Implementation
> >Task Force.
>
> >The Membership Im
Andrew McLaughlin wrote (to the ICANN-announce list):
>ICANN is actively seeking expressions of interest from individuals who would
>like to volunteer to serve as members of ICANN's Membership Implementation
>Task Force.
>The Membership Implementation Task Force will play a key role
Esther and all,
One way, Esther that you can do at least a first level check as I have
mentioned before is to use LDAP on your browser (IF it is Netscape
that is), against the suspected name and the E-Mail address.
Esther Dyson wrote:
> We're working on deciding that. What's *your* opinion?
We're working on deciding that. What's *your* opinion? How should we
determine if you're a real individual? (As Jay [Fenello?] suggests
indirectly - and respectfully - below, please see all the history on
membership at www.icann.org, too!)
Esther
At 09:32 AM 10/02/99 -0700, Ken Freed wrote:
>W
ssage-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken
>> Freed
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 1999 10:32 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: ICANN Membership
>>
>>
>> Would an individual like me, without any
>>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ICANN Membership
>
>
> Would an individual like me, without any
> financial interest in DNS registrations
> (beyond wanting URLs to be affordble
> and fair), be "qualified" to join ICANN
> and to participate within the DNSO?
> And
Would an individual like me, without any
financial interest in DNS registrations
(beyond wanting URLs to be affordble
and fair), be "qualified" to join ICANN
and to participate within the DNSO?
And would there be any bounds on
speaking up, electronically or in person?
Is the door truly open to an
Molly and all,
The membership mailing list does not provide instructions for
subscribing that I could see. In addition it seems to be thwarting
openness and Transparency pretty solidly as well by a couple of the
restrictions.
To wit:
--Do not post more than five messages per individual per 24-
