Just wondering if someone can help me with what I would think is basic
setup.
I want to run pf instead of monowall on net4801 hardware. (Soekris) When I
install monowall it for the most part just up and works, a very quick trip
to the console to establish Eth0,Eth1 and Eth2 and I am ready for
I install pfSense all the time and configure and it just works. What kind of
internet connection are you using? If you are using a private IP address from
a providers router on the WAN interface it is possible that pfSense is blocking
the private ip address traffic on the WAN. This is on by
Most, if not all setups would be behind an existing firewall (typical setup
would be in an office, gives 'easy' access to the network for phone, tablets
etc. As well as giving guests access if required.
I also have a number of hotel/fuel station hot spots that would have a
direct connection
On 01/05/2012 15:30, Nelson Serafica wrote:
I've pfsense with port forwarding running fine if the rules is WAN to
LAN but if the rules is LAN to LAN. It doesn't work. I'm using DSL and
if WAN is down, local users cannot access the server because the ip on
WAN is not available. To resolve this
I'm sorry. Where could I find that? Is that under Firewall-NAT ?
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Giles Coochey gi...@coochey.net wrote:
Have you tried toggling the 'Static Route Filtering' option in the Advanced
settings?
--
___
List mailing list
On 5/1/2012 10:48 AM, Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca wrote:
Everything would be in default, my network is 192.168.0.x, WAN is setup for
DHCP, no other config.
The default LAN in pfSense is 192.168.1.x, same as m0n0wall.
Two identical boxes (Net4801-48) image one with m0n0 and it works, image the
other
On 5/1/2012 10:48 AM, Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca wrote:
Everything would be in default, my network is 192.168.0.x, WAN is setup
for
DHCP, no other config.
The default LAN in pfSense is 192.168.1.x, same as m0n0wall.
Yes, aware of that MY office network is 192.168.0.x
Two identical boxes
There just is not enough detail to say why it's happening. Even seeing
the output of the banner on the console menu would be more than we're
seeing here. Going on pure speculation only gets us so far.
As below. Connecting a PC to sis0 (through a switch) will get an IP
(10.0.0.100) however and
On 01/05/2012 15:55, Nelson Serafica wrote:
I'm sorry. Where could I find that? Is that under Firewall-NAT ?
Actually, looking at this more closely, it probably isn't what you're
looking for, but it's in the Advanced firewall or networking tabs.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Giles
The way we do it in my office is using Split DNS. We have DNS servers in a
datacenter that resolve public queries for our servers and return the
public IP addresses. We also have internal DNS (we are using a server but
you can use the pfSense's built-in DNS server) and our names point to the
Am 01.05.2012 17:34, schrieb Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca:
There just is not enough detail to say why it's happening. Even seeing
the output of the banner on the console menu would be more than we're
seeing here. Going on pure speculation only gets us so far.
As below. Connecting a PC to sis0 (through
You have the same subnet on WAN and OPT1.
Remove the OPT1 (or move to a different subnet) and it will probably
start working.
mailman/listinfo/list
Did a factory reset assigned WAN and LAN and no OPT have not touched ANY
other config. (Also have not tested with laptop on LAN yet, but will just
The docs (http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/VMwareAppliance) state that
there is no longer a current vmware appliance for download. Is there a
particular reason for this? Are there plans to reinstate that at some
point?
db
___
List mailing list
If you look at the Snapshots server, it seems that there are VMWare
snapshots.
32-bit
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/i386/pfSense_HEAD/virtualization/?C=M;O=D
64-bit
http://snapshots.pfsense.org/FreeBSD_RELENG_8_3/amd64/pfSense_HEAD/virtualization/?C=M;O=D
If you look at the
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Moshe Katz mo...@ymkatz.net wrote:
If you look at the Snapshots server, it seems that there are VMWare
snapshots.
Good. Thank you.
db
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Andrew @ ATMlogic.ca
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:02 PM
To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?
You have the same subnet on WAN and
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org
[mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Sean Cavanaugh
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 12:25 PM
To: 'pfSense support and discussion'
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pf vrs mono?
-Original Message-
From:
Hi all,
I don't have much experience with captive portal, so I'm doing some
testing with 2.0.1 in a vm. It's a bog standard WAN-LAN setup with CP
enabled on the LAN. I don't want any authentication, I simply want to
present a small html page with links to a couple of web sites. I have
created
Looking to
switch from Monowall to Pfsense for gaming reasons; I have one Xbox 360 and
have had no luck getting the strict NAT message to leave when using
Monowall. I have noticed that some have
been successful in getting Pfsense to work without having a strict NAT
message. Following the
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Lazy Sod
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 1:44 PM
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: [pfSense] pfsense gaming
Looking to switch from Monowall to Pfsense for gaming reasons; I have one
Xbox 360 and have had no
On 5/1/2012 1:43 PM, Lazy Sod wrote:
Looking to switch from Monowall to Pfsense for gaming reasons; I have
one Xbox 360 and have had no luck getting the strict NAT message to
leave when using Monowall.I have noticed that some have been
successful in getting Pfsense to work without having a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:54 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
When the LAN user clicks on the link the browser just times
out. I changed the link to http://www.paypal.com, but the browser
still times out, and I believe it's because paypal is redirecting to
https.
To answer my own
I have had good luck turning on upnp and getting the message to go away.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ernst den Broeder er...@denbroeder.cawrote:
On 5/1/2012 1:43 PM, Lazy Sod wrote:
Looking to switch from Monowall to Pfsense for gaming reasons; I have
one Xbox 360 and have had no luck
The only way I got mine to work was to offer DHCP to the Xbox through pfSense
and turn on upnp for that device only.
Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote:
I have had good luck turning on upnp and getting the message to go away.
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Ernst den Broeder
Wow, Thanks to everyone for the information; I used the settings Ernst gave me
and it works flawlessly.
I look forward to learning more about this product and hopefully contributing
useful information to the mail list.
From: cbr...@radnetworx.com
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Date: Tue, 1 May
I'm getting the following errors after installing pfBlocker, I tried
increasing the firewall maximum table size but still getting the errors, has
anyone experience or has solution to this?
There were error(s) loading the rules: /tmp/rules.debug:21: cannot define
table pfBlockerAsia: Cannot
26 matches
Mail list logo
