Il 04/07/2012 15:41, Giles Coochey ha scritto:
On 04/07/2012 11:06, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 04/07/2012 11:44, Ermal Luçi ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
wrote:
Il 02/07/2012 15:51, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
On 7/2/2012 9:38 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrot
Il 04/07/2012 16:21, Sean Cavanaugh ha scritto:
Once you have an incoming connection (first time) to, let's say from INT X
to INT Y, dest IP Z, dest port P, will these alternative >rules be evaluated
in same moment or not?
- Evaluate INPUT on INT X, dest IP Z, dest port P
- Evaluate OUTPUT on I
This is why I just hit the reset button on the modem to reset the MAC
address lock.
-Original Message-
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Gavin Will
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2012 12:26 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re
It is quite possibly the mac address that needs to be cloned of the last
"working" connected devices.
I always do a mac clone if I am replacing a router.
The ISP is expecting to see the mac address of the old device. It will clear
after a while and would work but it could be 5 minutes, 4 hours
Le 4 juil. 2012 à 17:48, bsd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have setup a simple aDSL line and used a D-Link DSL-320B modem in order to
> connect It.
> This modem will be used as a backup line.
>
> My modem is setup as a bridged.
>
> When I connect my computer to the ethernet interface of the modem,
Hi,
I have setup a simple aDSL line and used a D-Link DSL-320B modem in order to
connect It.
This modem will be used as a backup line.
My modem is setup as a bridged.
When I connect my computer to the ethernet interface of the modem, I am
directly assigned the Internet IP (public IP).
Wh
>
>Once you have an incoming connection (first time) to, let's say from INT X
to INT Y, dest IP Z, dest port P, will these alternative >rules be evaluated
in same moment or not?
>
>- Evaluate INPUT on INT X, dest IP Z, dest port P
>- Evaluate OUTPUT on INT Y, dest IP Z, dest port P
>If the answer
On 04/07/2012 11:06, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 04/07/2012 11:44, Ermal Luçi ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
wrote:
Il 02/07/2012 15:51, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
On 7/2/2012 9:38 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Too much confusion in keeping filters tables
I confirm too: excellent support!
Odette
--
Odette Nsaka
Il giorno mar, 03/07/2012 alle 15.26 -0600, James Caldwell ha scritto:
> Absolutely, some of the best support I've had for a software solution to date.
>
> James
...
___
List mailing list
Li
Il 04/07/2012 11:44, Ermal Luçi ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
wrote:
Il 02/07/2012 15:51, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
On 7/2/2012 9:38 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Too much confusion in keeping filters tables,
Switching how the entire firewall operates is a
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati)
wrote:
> Il 02/07/2012 15:51, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
>
>> On 7/2/2012 9:38 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
>>>
>>> Too much confusion in keeping filters tables,
>>
>> Switching how the entire firewall operates is also very confusing and
>> not
Il 02/07/2012 15:51, Jim Pingle ha scritto:
On 7/2/2012 9:38 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Too much confusion in keeping filters tables,
Switching how the entire firewall operates is also very confusing and
not likely to do what people expect -- floating rules would be much
easier to understa
12 matches
Mail list logo
