Re: [pfSense] soekris net6501 max throughput

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Pedro Serotto wrote: > Dear all, > I have a fresh install on the above HW. > > My configuration is quite simple. > About ten nat rules, eight load balancer's pools and eight carp's virtual > ip. > > When I try to download something through pfSense I never get over

Re: [pfSense] Android VPN with pfSense

2012-09-11 Thread Gavin Will
I tested Open VPN with an android phone the other day. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.blinkt.openvpn&hl=en Is the client used. Worked very well. FYI it was certificate and password I was using -Original Message- From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun

Re: [pfSense] soekris net6501 max throughput

2012-09-11 Thread Pedro Serotto
You're right. There was an error on the interface's configuration. Sorry Tnx :-) De: Chris Buechler Para: pfSense support and discussion Enviado: Martes 11 de septiembre de 2012 9:21 Asunto: Re: [pfSense] soekris net6501 max throughput On Mon, Sep 10, 20

[pfSense] pfsync Synchronize Peer IP best practice

2012-09-11 Thread Pedro Serotto
Dear all, which value do you usually set in pfsync Synchronize Peer IP ? The other peer pfsync ip address ? Is it right to leave empty ? Which behaviour should I expect in one scenario or the other ? Many many tnx Pedro ___ List mailing list List@li

Re: [pfSense] pfsync Synchronize Peer IP best practice

2012-09-11 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Pedro Serotto wrote: > which value do you usually set in pfsync Synchronize Peer IP ? > The other peer pfsync ip address ? > Is it right to leave empty ? > When I set this up with a dedicated NIC just for the pfsync, I left it blank as hinted on the configuration

Re: [pfSense] openVPN Bug?

2012-09-11 Thread Chuck Mariotti
>If you use the same certificate on two clients, it will do that. >Or if you connect two clients to a shared key instance, it will do that. > >In the first case, you can check "Duplicate Connections" to allow multiple >people to connect from the same certificate, but that is highly discouraged. >

[pfSense] Rv: pfsync Synchronize Peer IP best practice

2012-09-11 Thread Pedro Serotto
I have a dedicated NIC too. But, do you set the remote ip, on every side or only on the master side. Is right that the session migrate only from master to slave and never from slave to master ? Tnx Pedro De: Vick Khera Para: Pedro Serotto ; pfSense suppo

Re: [pfSense] pfsync Synchronize Peer IP best practice

2012-09-11 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Pedro Serotto wrote: > I have a dedicated NIC too. > > But, do you set the remote ip, on every side or only on the master side. > > Is right that the session migrate only from master to slave and never from > slave to master ? > You set the remote IP on both boxes

[pfSense] dropped incoming connections after update

2012-09-11 Thread Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu
Hello, I inherited a very old instance of pfsense (1.0.1) acting as a router and firewall between multiple DMZs and WAN (LAN is empty and unused). After updating to 1.2.3, outbound connections were working fine, but I was no longer able to connect to any of the servers from outside. Not wanting t

Re: [pfSense] openVPN Bug?

2012-09-11 Thread Matthew Patton
The Schew Soft IKE client doesn't require "Admin" privs. What I wish for though is an actual, working Cisco VPN client configuration. -- Cloud Services Architect, Senior System Administrator InfoRelay Online Systems (www.inforelay.com) ___ List mailin

Re: [pfSense] openVPN Bug?

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Matthew Patton wrote: > The Schew Soft IKE client doesn't require "Admin" privs. What I wish for > though is an actual, working Cisco VPN client configuration. > The Cisco IPsec client works. OpenVPN can run as a non-admin with surun, and is vastly more stable th

Re: [pfSense] dropped incoming connections after update

2012-09-11 Thread Chris Buechler
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu wrote: > Hello, > > I inherited a very old instance of pfsense (1.0.1) acting as a router > and firewall between multiple DMZs and WAN (LAN is empty and unused). > > After updating to 1.2.3, outbound connections were working fine, but I > wa

[pfSense] pfsense 2.0.1, soekris 6501 and amd64

2012-09-11 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I tried and got: Root mount waiting for: usbus3 urying to mount root from ufsd:a/0d eavt/ uufmsa/spsf-sseinms0e 0b sR O0O Ts cMbOuUsN0T tEaRrRgOeRt: 0 ulIufn y0o dhaa0v:e e bRoeomto,v aabnld e fDiirrsetc t