Re: [pfSense] pfSense version 2.1.1 has been released

2014-04-04 Thread Peder Rovelstad
Worked for me on my home FW, but didn't reboot on own (I did receive mail message that it would reboot in 10 sec). Power cycle brought it back on the right slice. Looking good! I really shouldn't do these things when I'm on call. :/ ___ List

Re: [pfSense] pfSense version 2.1.1 has been released

2014-04-04 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Peder Rovelstad provels...@comcast.net wrote: Worked for me on my home FW, but didn't reboot on own (I did receive mail message that it would reboot in 10 sec). Power cycle brought it back on the right slice. Looking good! Did you inadvertently switch

Re: [pfSense] pfSense version 2.1.1 has been released

2014-04-04 Thread Peder Rovelstad
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Peder Rovelstad provels...@comcast.net wrote: Worked for me on my home FW, but didn't reboot on own (I did receive mail message that it would reboot in 10 sec). Power cycle brought it back on the right slice. Looking good! Did you inadvertently switch

Re: [pfSense] pfSense version 2.1.1 has been released

2014-04-04 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Peder Rovelstad provels...@comcast.net wrote: I auto-updated through the GUI. It is nano on a recycled Stonesoft SSL-400 VPN appliance. VIA Esther proc, 1000MHz, Realteks, 4GB SLC SSD and 1GB RAM. Ah, you definitely didn't switch architectures then or you

Re: [pfSense] successor to ALIX is here

2014-04-04 Thread Thinker Rix
On 2014-04-02 23:24, Ryan Coleman wrote: Wouldn't a layer-3 switch be a good investment in this situation? Put the load on another device instead of, what is for all intents and (definitely) purpose a /thin, light-weight/ piece of hardware? A switch? Not really, since I would like to have the

Re: [pfSense] successor to ALIX is here

2014-04-04 Thread Ryan Coleman
And you cannot eliminate three of this with a switch? Sounds like you should look at your design. -- Ryan Coleman On Apr 4, 2014, at 22:59, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com wrote: On 2014-04-02 23:24, Ryan Coleman wrote: Wouldn’t a layer-3 switch be a good investment in this