We've gone all-in with AC in challenging environments (crowded,
congested etc). UniFi AP-AC to be exact. It's awesome.
One trick with UniFi AP-AC (vs AP-PRO) is that UniFi AP-AC *needs*
802.3at PoE PSE. It will APPEAR to work with 802.3af PoE PSE, but it
will choke under even light load. L
I have Trendnet 653APs that work really well. it’s B/G/N (no AC or A or 5GHz)
and runs as 2x3 quite well.
They’re POE or DC, handle VLANs well, too. $65 on amazon NIB and I think they
come with the AC/DC adapter.
> On Jul 17, 2015, at 2:21 PM, compdoc wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any recomm
On 17 Jul 2015, at 15:50, Jim Spaloss wrote:
> Ubiquiti Unifi.
+1 would recommend - with caveats.
The AC model is… flaky - or at least, it was when I tried it at the end of
2014. Only about 50% of client devices would connect at a time - seemingly
random - restart the AP and some different one
>Does anyone have any recommendations for small office access points?
I use a Zyxel WAP3205 v1, which was fairly inexpensive. I use pfSense to
provide DHCP and rules for the clients, and have the features in the WAP
that are said to be easy to hack disabled. (like WPA Compatible, and WPS)
So, i
UniFi has several models, AC included.
You can have the controller running on a Raspberry Pi or VM.
Best regards
Kostas
Sent from my iPhone
> On 17 Ιουλ 2015, at 18:16, Chuck Mariotti wrote:
>
> I guess I should mention, the internet connections are usually 150Mbit+ ...
> so would need some
I have two VPN which are established on the OPT1 ip address. The WAN is the
default and a different ISP. The VPN (IPSEC) shows the tunnel is up and
receiving traffic but no traffic is routing OUT the tunnel. When I do a
traceroute from an internal host, it shows the traffic going out the wron
I have two wan connections (earthlink[OPT1] and Comcast[WAN]) and one lan. The
Comcast is the default WAN/gateway. I need to setup a source NAT so that all
outbound traffic from a specific IP address is routed OUT the OPT1 wan
connection. I setup an outbound nat but that does not work - it st
Another vote for Ubiquiti Unifi APs. Just be aware that the Pro models use
standard PoE, but the non-Pro use 24v, so you will need to use the included
PoE adapter even if you plug it into a PoE switch. As for the controller
software, you only need to have it running while doing config, updates, or
Be aware, though, the UAP-AC is missing some banner UniFi features.
No Zero-Handoff
No Wireless Backhaul
I can't tell if any of the UniFi indoor stuff does the UNII-2e/DFS
stuff. The AC's certainly don't.
On 7/17/15 08:29, David Burgess wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Chuck Mariotti
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Chuck Mariotti wrote:
> We are having a number of issues with Engenius Access Points... they seems to
> have the features we need but for some reason, connectivity is not reliable
> (seems Mac related). As much time as I would like to spend debugging it, it
> wo
I guess I should mention, the internet connections are usually 150Mbit+ ... so
would need something in the n or a/c range preferably.
Lots of devices, laptops (hooked up to Ethernet but still wifi active when
walking around).
-Original Message-
From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsen
Probably get flamed for this but my experience has been positive. Purchase a
router that is capable of running Tomato, preferably Toastman or Shibby. I
still use a $15 ebay Linksys WRT54GL that is rock solid and with Tomato it
includes built in OpenVPN software to connect to pfsense at the off
Ubiquiti Unifi.
I switched to them from Engenuis for several clients. Price point is
similar to Engenuis and they use a software based controller (you need to
have that installed on some PC in the enviromment.) Signal quality is good.
On Jul 17, 2015 9:45 AM, "Chuck Mariotti" wrote:
> We are havi
We are having a number of issues with Engenius Access Points... they seems to
have the features we need but for some reason, connectivity is not reliable
(seems Mac related). As much time as I would like to spend debugging it, it
would be cheaper to replace.
Does anyone have any recommendations
Thanks a lot...
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Joy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > i am using latest version of pfsense 2.2.3 after upgrade from 2.1.5.
> > In 2.1.5 my layer 7 filtration was working perfectly while enabling the
> > same in 2.2.
15 matches
Mail list logo
