Re: [pfSense] Lightning strike

You are making a very poor assumption about which parts of the "Ethernet" interface are missing after a high voltage event. You may still have (enough of) the MAC to be enumerated on the (PCI/PCIe/...) bus. If this occurs, then no renumbering will take place, since, as far as BIOS/boot

Re: [pfSense] Lightning strike

On Fri 14 Oct 2016 11:25:12 NZDT +1300, Walter Parker wrote: > Problem is that all of the current OS do this sort of renumbering (I'd have > to check, but I think it could be a hardware/driver issue). IIRC Linux > systems have had this sort of problem in even greater measure than the > BSDs. The

Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.3.2-p1 RELEASE Now Available

On Fri 14 Oct 2016 11:21:10 NZDT +1300, Jim Pingle wrote: > There are no installers for 2.3.2-p1. You have to install 2.3.2 and > update to patch 1 once it's installed. Ah, I see, that's why pre-2.3.2 doesn't offer it as an update either. I haven't noticed this situation having existed before,

Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.3.2-p1 RELEASE Now Available

On 10/13/2016 5:53 PM, Volker Kuhlmann wrote: > I can't believe there is a major fault, but where is the download for > 2.3.2-p1? There are no installers for 2.3.2-p1. You have to install 2.3.2 and update to patch 1 once it's installed. Jim ___

Re: [pfSense] Lightning strike

On Wed 27 Jul 2016 13:40:16 NZST +1200, Chris Buechler wrote: > > I find this really really annoying of pfsense! Especially for headless > > systems. Hey, why run with only one interface and some functionality > > missing when one can run with functionality of zero point zero instead? > >

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

Ok Thanx for information! -Luc -- ! ( o o ) --oOO(_)OOo-- Luc Paulin email: paulinster(at)gmail.com Skype: paulinster 2016-10-13 13:08 GMT-04:00 Steve Yates : > The rules

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

The rules should sync at every rule change. (alias, etc.) If states are syncing those are in real time. -- Steve Yates ITS, Inc. -Original Message- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Luc Paulin Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2016 12:00 PM To: pfSense

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

I think I am good now .. I have delete the sync interface and then recreate it ... All look good now and system is syncing beetween each-other. One more question, can we change the frequency of the sync ? Look like the default is ~10min -Luc -- !

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

What version pfSense? We are on 2.3.2 without the latest patch (2.3.2_1), using CARP/sync, since whatever version was in spring 2015, and haven't had this issue. -- Steve Yates ITS, Inc. -Original Message- From: List [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org] On Behalf Of Luc Paulin

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

Rule is disapearing on the slave only ... Yes both firewall's interface's description are the same and assign to the same interface... -Luc -- ! ( o o ) --oOO(_)OOo-- Luc Paulin email:

Re: [pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

Are your rules disappearing on the slave, the master, or both? Brainstorming, do both have the same name for the pfsync interface? Meaning the slave isn't named PFSYNC-SLAVE or something like that? -- Steve Yates ITS, Inc. -Original Message- From: List

[pfSense] pfsense in ha - sync interface rule disapear

Hi Everyone, I am new to pfsense and I have to say to that I am very impressed to see all the feature available out of box. I am currently testing it to see how well it work and perform for our environement. We would like to replace our HA linux firewall running IPTable/fwbuiler scripts.