Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Jim Thompson
On Thursday, January 26, 2017, Espen Johansen wrote: > Are you saying worst case is 80%? Its not normal to have all minimum size > packets unless you are under ddos. > Default ethernet is 1526 (1530 with vlan) with a MTU 1500 on a layer 1 > frame. > A layer 2 frame is 1518 (1522 with vlan). > If

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Espen Johansen
Are you saying worst case is 80%? Its not normal to have all minimum size packets unless you are under ddos. Default ethernet is 1526 (1530 with vlan) with a MTU 1500 on a layer 1 frame. A layer 2 frame is 1518 (1522 with vlan). If you want to include all layer headers then 1542 including vlan is t

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Vick Khera
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 3:12 PM, Vick Khera wrote: > ahci_load="YES" > Indeed, this line is leftover from olden days. This is not necessary anymore with the FreeBSD 10.x kernel. ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list S

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Vick Khera
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:17 PM, Karl Fife wrote: > Would you mind sharing a snapshot of your Rangeley-optimized tunables? > > IIRC there are un-editable tunables that show on your tunables page that > are not called out in the XML config. > > Thanks Vick > > This is the /boot/loader.conf from o

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Jim Thompson
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:06 PM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote: > > Am 2017-01-26 07:03, schrieb Jim Thompson: >> It does not. >> The c2758 SoC is interesting. 8 cores, and the on-die i354 is essentially a >> block with 4 i350s on it. >> These have 8 queues for each of rx and tx, so 16 each, for a

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Jim Thompson
Line rate for 10GbE is 14.88Mpps. Your frame size doesn't include many overheads. Ethernet specific (20 bytes) 12 bytes = inter-frame gap (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpacket_gap) this is really time 8 bytes = MAC preamble + SFD Ethernet frame (64 bytes) 14 bytes = MAC header 46 bytes = M

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Karl Fife
Would you mind sharing a snapshot of your Rangeley-optimized tunables? IIRC there are un-editable tunables that show on your tunables page that are not called out in the XML config. Thanks Vick On 1/26/2017 9:47 AM, Vick Khera wrote: On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Karl Fife wrote: I r

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Vick Khera
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Karl Fife wrote: > I recently did a virgin install of 2.3.2 nano on an older atom (a Soekris > 6501), and found there were no tunables for kern.ipc.nmbclusters nor > kern.ipc.nmbufs. Maybe it's a nano/full-install difference?I would > think most people runnin

Re: [pfSense] SG-1000 and VPN

2017-01-26 Thread Steve Yates
> It currently does 21mbps IPsec (aes-gcm-128), in a lab environment, because > there is no driver for the crypto core (yet). > OpenVPN is slightly slower (19 Mbps). Thanks. That is probably sufficient for most applications since one or both ends is likely limited by Internet upload speed anywa

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread rainer
Am 2017-01-26 07:03, schrieb Jim Thompson: It does not. The c2758 SoC is interesting. 8 cores, and the on-die i354 is essentially a block with 4 i350s on it. These have 8 queues for each of rx and tx, so 16 each, for a total of 64 queues. On the c2xxx series (and other) boxes we ship, we in

Re: [pfSense] Intel Atom C2758 (Rangeley/Avoton) install/boot failure with pfSense 2.3.2

2017-01-26 Thread Espen Johansen
What do you mean by 12Mpps or 80% or 10GE? 12Mpps at 150 packet length is 13.4Gbps. At 1200 (good inet avg.) you should hit 107Gbps. Where does the 80% of 10GE come from? On Thu, Jan 26, 2017, 07:04 Jim Thompson wrote: It does not. The c2758 SoC is interesting. 8 cores, and the on-die i354 is