You don't mention if you had fd working on the earlier version of pf.
You must have checked the config file for password and dir settings. The
upgrade might have changed it because this might be a fresh install of fd.
You say it is not listening, that sounds like there is an attempt at
Kickstarter had/has a campaign by iguardian to create a snort appliance. It
looks like something you are trying to do. Instead of pf, it is based on
openwrt. Check it out.
Yudhvir
On Sep 29, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Ivo Tonev i...@tonev.pro.br wrote:
I don't like the bridge approach because if
Senior year in what program?
Yudhvir
On Sep 8, 2014, at 5:09 PM, Hamdan Khalifah montolivo1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am a senior year I have project about Pfsense, and I am not sure which
should I focus on Routing, Firewall, VPN, or other stuff.
May you advise me which
That block is on a TCP packet, not UDP. Also, is there something on the othersid
Yudhvir
On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
On 14-07-17 12:32 PM, NetSys Pro wrote:
Here's the output:
Jul 17 21:27:50 fw2 pf: 10.6.2.10 192.168.6.106: ICMP echo request,
Sorry fat fingered the reply. Is there something on the other end of the Ping
to answer?
Yudhvir
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:11 PM, Mehmasarja Darks mehmasa...@gmail.com wrote:
That block is on a TCP packet, not UDP. Also, is there something on the
othersid
Yudhvir
On Jul 17, 2014, at 4:26
I second nixing the thread. pfSense does not benefit from this.
Mehma
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jim Thompson j...@netgate.com wrote:
On Oct 11, 2013, at 12:39, Thinker Rix thinke...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Again: The real threat by my comprehension is not some guy in the internet
This has nothing to do with pfSense misbehaving I'm sure. However, it makes
good reading. And who knows, maybe there is a sympathetic soul out there who
has shed sweat over this ahead of me.
A couple of package installs rendered pf 2.0 on an embedded Alix unusable.
Removing the packages in
