I second nixing the thread. pfSense does not benefit from this. Mehma
On Oct 11, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Jim Thompson <j...@netgate.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 11, 2013, at 12:39, Thinker Rix <thinke...@rocketmail.com> wrote: >> >> Again: The real threat by my comprehension is not some "guy in the internet" >> trying to place malicious code into the code base, but simply and plainly >> some NSA officers knock the door an force the project leaders to do it. > > Please cite the law they might use to so this. > > Hint: it doesn't exist. > > Hint 2: if you think Lavabit applies, you're part of the problem. > > Otherwise: get off my lawn. > > I'm willing to listen to: > > "I've dreamed up this possible attack that could inject bad code into > pfSense." > > And especially, "I think I've found a problem." > > I'm not willing to endure this uninformed Alex Jonesian crapfest. > > Now that I'm back on US soil, I promise that if the later continues, I will > kill the thread. People who hijack threads will be dealt with. > > I simply don't have time for it, and the people who actually work on pfSense > don't gave time for it. > > Nor will I endure the besmirching of pfSense's good name and trademark. > > If you have real issues, or even theories supported by minimal evidence, > bring them forward. > > Otherwise: STFU. > > Jim > > > _______________________________________________ > List mailing list > List@lists.pfsense.org > http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list _______________________________________________ List mailing list List@lists.pfsense.org http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
