[pfSense] how to find interface router

2016-09-08 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
line to read the /tmp/IF_router, but I miss all in between. My goal is to take that info and use it on pf route-to script. thanks, matheus -- Nenhum_de_Nos ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project

Re: [pfSense] Installation issues of latest release (2.3.2) resolved?

2016-08-19 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, 29 Jul 2016 23:19:45 -0500 Jim Thompson wrote: > pfSense is normally tested on the devices that Netgate has released as > products over the past two years. > > pfSense 2.3.2 was tested on the following devices and hypervisors: > > SG-2220 (eMMC and M.2), SG-2440 (eMMC and mSATA), SG-486

Re: [pfSense] USB3 to ethernet adaptor

2016-05-02 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, 2 May 2016 07:57:55 -0600 WebDawg wrote: > On May 2, 2016 1:56 AM, "Frans Meulenbroeks" > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Has anyone experience using USB3 to ethernet adapters ? I need an extra > > interface but my HW (Intel NUC) does not have room for another card). > > Anything recommendabl

Re: [pfSense] pfSense 2.3 and Unsupported Bandwidthd and Vnstat2

2016-04-13 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 06:44:12 -0500 "Peder Rovelstad" wrote: > First off, congratulations on the latest version. It is just beautiful in > its presentation of the management pages and so far I haven't run into any > (non-self-inflicted) problems, though it appears my VIA C7 platform is > reaching

Re: [pfSense] recover vnstat data

2016-02-19 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:52:10 -0600 WebDawg wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just installed a new pfsense here as a test, it worked well so far, so > > now I would like to take there the vnstat database files. I ca

[pfSense] recover vnstat data

2016-02-18 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hi, I just installed a new pfsense here as a test, it worked well so far, so now I would like to take there the vnstat database files. I can't write them, the fs os RO. I would not like to open the case and shut them both down. Is there a way for it ? thanks, matheus -- "We will call you Cy

Re: [pfSense] Remote squid log

2016-01-18 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
other line on /etc/fstab ? My main concern is when updating. thanks, matheus -- Nenhum_de_Nos ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] Remote squid log

2016-01-05 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:30:25 -0700 David Burgess wrote: > : > > > > Log location must start with a / character. > > > > > > Is there a way to handle this? > > > > I need it to be saved remotely :( > > > > > > Can you mount the remote filesystem locally? I have run squid using pfSense > on a c

[pfSense] Remote squid log

2016-01-04 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I have pfsense on cf card and want to use squid on it. I found that squid can use tcp or udp ports (http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/LogModules). I then tried to use udp://host:514 and I get from pfsense engine: The following input errors were detected: Log location must start

[pfSense] Dhcpd and the "deny unknown clients" option

2015-10-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hi, I would like to make this active on just one lan segment, but clients keep getting addresses from dhcpd. Is there a way for this to work, am I doing it wrong ? :) thanks, BTW, this is pfsense 2.1.5 amd64. thanks, matheus -- "We will call you Cygnus, the God of balance you shall be." __

Re: [pfSense] 2.2.4 high cpu usage

2015-08-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 21:30:12 -0300 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying the 2.2.4 i386 nanobsd version on the soekris 5501-70. It works > better then the earlier 2.2.x releases, but yet there is a catch. > > My load quite always close to 1, when I have all two li

[pfSense] 2.2.4 high cpu usage

2015-08-02 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
fe to say the 2.2.x are good for those old soekris ? thanks, matheus -- Nenhum_de_Nos ___ pfSense mailing list https://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list Support the project with Gold! https://pfsense.org/gold

Re: [pfSense] net5501-70 and pfsense 2.2.x

2015-05-21 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
is the way to go here. thanks, matheus > > On 2015, May 18, at 8:58 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:30:24 -0300 > > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:56:28 -0300 > >> Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >>

Re: [pfSense] net5501-70 and pfsense 2.2.x

2015-05-18 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 08:30:24 -0300 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:56:28 -0300 > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Are there any known issues in this couple ? > > > > Since I updated to 2.2.x (never tried 2.2, just 2.2.1 and 2.2.2)

Re: [pfSense] net5501-70 and pfsense 2.2.x

2015-04-30 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:56:28 -0300 Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > Hi, > > Are there any known issues in this couple ? > > Since I updated to 2.2.x (never tried 2.2, just 2.2.1 and 2.2.2) I get a > freeze when I access WebUI when uptime is past a little minutes. I was logged >

[pfSense] net5501-70 and pfsense 2.2.x

2015-04-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hi, Are there any known issues in this couple ? Since I updated to 2.2.x (never tried 2.2, just 2.2.1 and 2.2.2) I get a freeze when I access WebUI when uptime is past a little minutes. I was logged in via ssh, and the console got until this: Message from syslogd@cygnus at Apr 28 09:46:53 ...

[pfSense] Multi-Wan question

2015-01-29 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I have a multi-wan connection, and this is a unknown behavior to me: I have two Wan links, 10Mbps and 3Mbps. This machine has a rule on LAN (there is only one lan side, and lan address) to use the 3Mbps link. Now I got two downloads in on this machine, and I see the total bandwidth for t

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE Via Padlock

2015-01-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, January 26, 2015 23:34, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Mon, January 26, 2015 09:16, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> >> On Sun, January 25, 2015 22:59, Peder Rovelstad wrote: >>> Hello. Has Via Padlock Hardware Crypto support been disabled in >>> pfSense/FreeBSD

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE Via Padlock

2015-01-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, January 26, 2015 09:16, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Sun, January 25, 2015 22:59, Peder Rovelstad wrote: >> Hello. Has Via Padlock Hardware Crypto support been disabled in >> pfSense/FreeBSD 10? Not a big deal for me as I can stay on 2.1.5, but may >> be for othe

Re: [pfSense] 2.2-RELEASE Via Padlock

2015-01-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Sun, January 25, 2015 22:59, Peder Rovelstad wrote: > Hello. Has Via Padlock Hardware Crypto support been disabled in > pfSense/FreeBSD 10? Not a big deal for me as I can stay on 2.1.5, but may > be for others. Also, when will x86 support disappear entirely? Burdened by > old hardware here.

Re: [pfSense] RRD persistence

2015-01-07 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, January 7, 2015 14:37, Vick Khera wrote: > On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: > >> is there a way to have it written like once a day/week ? >> > > In system -> advanced -> miscellaneous tab, there is an option to set how > fre

Re: [pfSense] RRD persistence

2015-01-07 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, January 7, 2015 11:27, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 01/07/2015 09:07 AM, Jeppe Øland wrote: >> Doesn't it automatically save the latest files when you reboot? >> I don't reboot often, but I don't remember ever having lost data >> (except if the firewall crashes - which did happen a few times in

[pfSense] RRD persistence

2015-01-07 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I have a couple of pfsense using the nanobsd approach. Great stability, great for flash memory. But I always loose my rrd data when I reboot. is there a way to have it written like once a day/week ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Becaus

[pfSense] Use 2.0.3 config on 2.1.5, does it work ?

2014-11-27 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I am about to change a firewall hardware, and I see the possibility to update the pfSense version as well. Is it safe to do it out-of-the-box ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read

Re: [pfSense] upgrade from 1.2.3

2014-10-07 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Tue, October 7, 2014 11:25, Jim Thompson wrote: > > We've seen a lot of instances where the hw has run for years, but has > developed silent, > undiagnosed issues (bad blocks, mostly). > > The upgrade doesn't "cause" a failure, but it gets blamed. > > While it might work, I'm absolutely certai

[pfSense] Routing issue

2014-09-18 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I have a strange issue. I get default route by OSPF. And that is fine. But I, then, need not to have default routes and gateways configured in. So far, so good. Now I need to set a route to another network, no default route then. I create the gateway, and as I have no other one the WebUI

Re: [pfSense] Difference between APU4 and APU1C4

2014-07-27 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On July 27, 2014 3:20:20 PM GMT-03:00, Chris Bagnall wrote: >On 27/7/14 7:06 pm, Matthias May wrote: >> With intel cards on the same board you can get up to 650 Mbit/s, but >i >> expect it to be lower with additional rules. > >Have you tried it with Intel cards (I assume you're talking mPCIe >

Re: [pfSense] Difference between APU4 and APU1C4

2014-07-22 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On 2014-07-22 11:40, Ryan Coleman wrote: Is there a difference between the 4 and the 1C4? Is Netgate just trying to fleece people for an extra $200 by packaging the entire thing together built and tested? http://store.netgate.com/kit-APU1C4.aspx http://store.netgate.com/APU4.aspx PC Engines o

Re: [pfSense] DDNS Custom config

2014-04-30 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, $server); curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, FALSE); break; thanks, matheus > On Apr 28, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >>

Re: [pfSense] DDNS Custom config

2014-04-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
I run nano on soekris and my fs is read only :( Is there a way without rebooting ? thanks, matheus > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: > >> >> Hail, >> >> I need to use the custom ddns but I need also to make it ignore the self >> sig

Re: [pfSense] DDNS Custom config

2014-04-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
e the break;. >> >> It would probably not be too hard to add this option. I will try to >submit >> a pull request later this week if it has not been done by someone >else. >> >> - Y >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Nenhum_de_No

[pfSense] DDNS Custom config

2014-04-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, I need to use the custom ddns but I need also to make it ignore the self signed cert on the server. The thing wget does with --no-check-certificate. Is this doable ? I tried to find something on .php code, but no luck for me (I know close to nothing of php). Yet, can I pass some info on

Re: [pfSense] Building pfSense

2014-04-13 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, April 11, 2014 22:24, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > hail, > > I had the link I followed the steps provided here > http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso, but it won't work > for me again. How can I > find the guide to build it myself ? > > I need t

[pfSense] 2.2-ALPHA amd64 and soekris 6501

2014-04-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, is this new versions booting on amd64 and soekris ? I got: FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root@builder-10.0-b3-amd64, Sun Apr 6 09:23:32 CDT 2014) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x9d1478 data=0x657578+0x258730 syms=[0x8+0xead68+0x8+0xe0dc8] Hit

[pfSense] Building pfSense

2014-04-11 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I had the link I followed the steps provided here http://devwiki.pfsense.org/DevelopersBootStrapAndDevIso, but it won't work for me again. How can I find the guide to build it myself ? I need to put the amd64 kernel option for my net6501. thanks, matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, Th

[pfSense] pfsense versions

2014-04-08 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Hail, as this new version had some issues in upgrading, I'd like to try some before doing on production. But I can't find the old isos and img's. How can I find them ? I found one mirror that has older files, looking one by one, and I am mirroring it on my server. Is there any policy on that ?

Re: [pfSense] successor to ALIX is here

2014-04-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, April 2, 2014 11:35, Eugen Leitl wrote: > > Apu.1c > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Embeddded-Mainboard-mit-x86-CPU-und-Coreboot-2160404.html > > http://www.pcengines.ch/apu1c.htm > > in stock, €105.13 a little off, but are those better as home fileserver then the soekris 6501 ?

Re: [pfSense] Altq on usb adapter - not showing

2014-03-01 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
changed this week) they dont have ue as altq capable. matheus > On Mar 1, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >> >> On Sat, March 1, 2014 19:56, Chris Buechler wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos >>> wrote: >>>>

Re: [pfSense] Altq on usb adapter - not showing

2014-03-01 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Sat, March 1, 2014 19:56, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: >> >> On Wed, February 26, 2014 11:18, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>> >>> hail, >>> >>> sometime agora I talked here about an ad

[pfSense] How to track these kind of things ?

2014-02-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I just got pfSense 2.1 running on an IBM machine using igb cards, and got all crazy things from them. I then found https://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,66908.msg367991.html#msg367991 and https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense/commit/f3a4601c85c4de78caa4f12fefd64067fd83dbe8, and it looks

Re: [pfSense] Altq on usb adapter - not showing

2014-02-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, February 26, 2014 11:18, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > hail, > > sometime agora I talked here about an adapter that was supported by FreeBSD > for altq, but pfsense > was not listing it as one altq-able nic. I got another (ue, axe based), and > just WAN (em base

[pfSense] Altq on usb adapter - not showing

2014-02-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, sometime agora I talked here about an adapter that was supported by FreeBSD for altq, but pfsense was not listing it as one altq-able nic. I got another (ue, axe based), and just WAN (em based) shows in the "By Interface" page. I tried to find the mail and could not find the mail. Witch

Re: [pfSense] FreeBSD 10.0 on Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite

2014-02-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Tue, February 11, 2014 09:55, Jim Thompson wrote: > > Thanks for this. > > As before, we'll supply a solution for pfSense on the ERL after 2.2 (based on > FreeBSD 10) after > 2.2 drops. thats a really great info ! pfSense/FreeBSD will evolve to a whole new level. Soekris hardware here is too

Re: [pfSense] List Digest, Vol 28, Issue 4

2013-12-05 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
;> list-requ...@lists.pfsense.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> list-ow...@lists.pfsense.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of List digest..." >>

Re: [pfSense] Who uses a Realtek RTL-8111 based nic without problems?

2013-12-04 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, December 4, 2013 11:57, Mathieu Simon wrote: > I have a Intel D510MO board (Atom D510) that I recently tossed 10.0-BETA3, > now BETA4 on > it. It seems this board has a the NIC you and others encounter issues with: > > re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0xd6158086 chip=0x816810ec rev=0x03

Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN clients

2013-12-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Duplicate Connections ? I know how to do it on older versions, but can't figure it out on 2.x. Is there any guide ? I need to make a CA and then a certificate for every connection ? How is that gonna be ? thanks, matheus > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > >

[pfSense] OpenVPN clients

2013-12-02 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, is there a kind of server on openvpn on pfsense that one server would work for several clients ? Its no site-to-site, just some notebooks to connect. On 1.2.3 days, the howto taught it good and I was able to issue certs for as much as clients. Now I can't find how. is there ? thanks, m

[pfSense] upgrade 1.2.3 -> 2.0.2: problem

2013-01-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I tried today to do this, and no good at all. For backup purposes, I installed a 1.2.3 and used the config to make it up to the production one, and then started the firmware upgrade. all told me fine until I rebooted. I was asked to set interfaces (which was not taken to me as normal ...

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.0.1, soekris 6501 and amd64

2012-09-13 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, September 12, 2012 21:06, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:49:23 -0400 > Jim Pingle wrote: > >> On 9/12/2012 12:35 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> > mountroot> >> > >> > >> > is there any way to solve this ? >> &

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.0.1, soekris 6501 and amd64

2012-09-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 13:49:23 -0400 Jim Pingle wrote: > On 9/12/2012 12:35 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > mountroot> > > > > > > is there any way to solve this ? > > > > Probably this: > > http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Boot_Troublesh

Re: [pfSense] pfsense 2.0.1, soekris 6501 and amd64

2012-09-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, September 12, 2012 13:29, Moshe Katz wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: > >> hail, >> >> I tried and got: >> >> Root mount waiting for: usbus3 >> urying to mount root from ufsd:a/0d eavt/ uufmsa/spsf-sseinms0e

[pfSense] pfsense 2.0.1, soekris 6501 and amd64

2012-09-11 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I tried and got: Root mount waiting for: usbus3 urying to mount root from ufsd:a/0d eavt/ uufmsa/spsf-sseinms0e 0b sR O0O Ts cMbOuUsN0T tEaRrRgOeRt: 0 ulIufn y0o dhaa0v:e e bRoeomto,v aabnld e fDiirrsetc t

Re: [pfSense] 2.1 timeline?

2012-06-28 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
Jim Pingle wrote: >[Please don't threadjack. Start a fresh message rather than replying to >an existing message, or threading mailreaders will bury your message >under an unrelated topic] > >On 6/27/2012 1:25 PM, Joe Landman wrote:> Hi folks ... any guidance on >the 2.1 timeline? Is it consider

Re: [pfSense] Soekris 6501 installation question

2012-01-27 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, January 25, 2012 20:19, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 1/23/2012 5:44 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> >> On Mon, January 23, 2012 16:52, Jim Pingle wrote: >>> Correct, the stock memstick image is VGA only. It's not meant to be run >>> long-term, it's just an

Re: [pfSense] Soekris 6501 installation question

2012-01-23 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, January 23, 2012 16:52, Jim Pingle wrote: > Correct, the stock memstick image is VGA only. It's not meant to be run > long-term, it's just an installer. > > If you're feeling lucky, I haven't heard back any input on this, but I > made a serial memstick the other day if you want to try. My

Re: [pfSense] 2.0.1 release available

2011-12-20 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Tue, December 20, 2011 21:08, Chris Buechler wrote: > info here: http://blog.pfsense.org/?p=633 Chris, my 2.0 i386 points to this link, it renders me 404. http://updates.pfsense.org/_updaters/ is it right ? matheus -- We will call you Cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because i

Re: [pfSense] pfsense and FreeBSD 9

2011-11-27 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, November 28, 2011 02:56, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: >> >> On Sat, November 26, 2011 20:50, Jim Pingle wrote: >>> On 11/26/2011 1:09 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >>>> is there an idea when pfsense w

Re: [pfSense] pfsense and FreeBSD 9

2011-11-27 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Sat, November 26, 2011 20:50, Jim Pingle wrote: > On 11/26/2011 1:09 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> is there an idea when pfsense will run FreeBSD9 ? I know 2.1 will have ipv6, >> what FreeBSD >> version >> will it run ? > > It will be on 9.x as others have sta

[pfSense] pfsense and FreeBSD 9

2011-11-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, is there an idea when pfsense will run FreeBSD9 ? I know 2.1 will have ipv6, what FreeBSD version will it run ? I have atheros plans with N support and saw 8.x won't work. thanks, matheus -- Vítima da Oi entre 2007 e 2011. We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: B

Re: [pfSense] X86 to X64 Question

2011-10-14 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, October 14, 2011 14:41, Vaughn L. Reid III wrote: > > > On 10/14/2011 1:19 PM, Jim Pingle wrote: >>> If you upgrade from x86 to x64. Can you do the upgrade remotely from >>> 2.0 release x86 using the gui? Or, is it necessary to do the upgrade >>> from the pfsense console command line int

Re: [pfSense] X86 to X64 Question

2011-10-14 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, October 14, 2011 06:40, Chris Buechler wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Nenhum_de_Nos > wrote: >> >> On Wed, October 12, 2011 09:34, Seth Mos wrote: >>> On 12-10-2011 14:07, Vaughn L. Reid III wrote: >>>> A few questions about moving to X6

Re: [pfSense] X86 to X64 Question

2011-10-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, October 12, 2011 11:12, Marcus Scholz wrote: > Am 12.10.2011 15:24, schrieb Nenhum_de_Nos: >> I didn't get it. Can I update to amd64. I have one such machine, >> and would like to make it amd64. the hardware is amd64 compatible, >> I have another box identical r

Re: [pfSense] X86 to X64 Question

2011-10-12 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Wed, October 12, 2011 09:34, Seth Mos wrote: > On 12-10-2011 14:07, Vaughn L. Reid III wrote: >> A few questions about moving to X64: >> >> Does moving to X64 require a fresh install, or can it be done via the >> update firmware controls in the web gui by selecting the x64 repository >> and the

Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN road warrior how to for 2.0

2011-10-04 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Tue, October 4, 2011 04:35, Webmaster Megastar wrote: > > > Le 04/10/2011 06:14, Nenhum_de_Nos a écrit : >> hail, >> >> is there any ? >> >> I looked for it, but nothing :( >> >> for 1.2.3 it works great, but I always get cert problem i

Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN RRD Graph

2011-10-04 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, October 3, 2011 21:37, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Mon, October 3, 2011 20:01, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: >> >> On Mon, October 3, 2011 16:43, Jim Pingle wrote: >>> >>> I have OpenVPN graphs for each server/client I have configured, under >>> traff

[pfSense] OpenVPN road warrior how to for 2.0

2011-10-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, is there any ? I looked for it, but nothing :( for 1.2.3 it works great, but I always get cert problem in 2.0 :( if anyone knows any ;) matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is t

[pfSense] vnstat2 package problem

2011-10-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail again, I just tried to install vnstat2 on three amd64 2.0R. The first I got: Beginning package installation for vnstat2... Downloading package configuration file... done. Saving updated package information... done. Downloading vnstat2 and its dependencies... Checking for package installation

Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN RRD Graph

2011-10-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, October 3, 2011 20:01, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Mon, October 3, 2011 16:43, Jim Pingle wrote: >> >> I have OpenVPN graphs for each server/client I have configured, under >> traffic graphs, plus a VPN tab that has the number of currently >> connected Op

Re: [pfSense] OpenVPN RRD Graph

2011-10-03 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
11 3:32 PM, Seth Mos wrote: >> I distinctly remember writing that code and graph. >> >> Indeed what has happened t it, I can't remember, should have been in the >> tree. It was well before 2.0 >> >> Cheers, >> Seth >> >> Op 2 okt 2011, om 2

[pfSense] OpenVPN RRD Graph

2011-10-02 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I thought some time ago I saw this option in the rrd graphs. was it ever there ? I tried now to find on 2.0R and didn't. I there anything to do to enable it ? thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people n

[pfSense] is there pfsense version newer then 2.0R available ?

2011-09-26 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, some time agot I read here something about 2.1 being live already, but I couldn't find where to get it. As I posted last week, I got a machine where the integrated nic won't work with FreeBSD 8.1, but will do fine in 8.2 onwards. is there any 2-HEAD, or alike I could use ? As 2.0R is just

Re: [pfSense] Realtek integrated nic problem

2011-09-24 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Fri, September 23, 2011 17:00, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > hail, > > I got a board equipped with: > > re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81051019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x05 > hdr=0x00 > class = network > subclass = ethernet > > and it is not recogn

[pfSense] Realtek integrated nic problem

2011-09-23 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I got a board equipped with: re0@pci0:1:0:0: class=0x02 card=0x81051019 chip=0x813610ec rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 class = network subclass = ethernet and it is not recognized by pfsense/FreeBSD 8.1. I there a way I can use if_re/if_rl from another FreeBSD Release (say 8.2 or 8-S

Re: [pfSense] AMD APU - Good Performer?

2011-09-19 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
On Mon, September 19, 2011 17:05, David Burgess wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Steven Sherwood wrote: >> Hello list, >> >> >> >> I’m considering a few different platforms for low powered but Gigabit >> capable firewall/routers, and have been looking at Mini-ITX systems >> based on >

[pfSense] NanoBSD updates

2011-09-17 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I updated my RC3 still says: Version 2.0-RC3 (i386) built on Sun Sep 11 22:10:57 EDT 2011 You are on the latest version. Platformnanobsd (2g) I guess this update won't take long, right ? Unlike 1.2.3->2.0, this should go straightforward as was RC1->RC3 ok ? thanks, mathe