.B.
Le 24 janv. 2013 à 18:41, Jim Pingle a écrit :
> On 1/24/2013 12:21 PM, bsd wrote:
>> Has anyone encountered DMA problems on CF card install (SLC) with 2.0.2 ?
>>
>> One of my clien reported a :
>>
>> ad0: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=1244343
&g
Hi,
Just a little question here.
Has anyone encountered DMA problems on CF card install (SLC) with 2.0.2 ?
One of my clien reported a :
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=1244343
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left) LBA=1256151
ad0: TIMEOUT - READ retrying (1 retry left)
Hi,
I have a question, I have deployed multiple OVPN networks for our office.
Since we have 4 / 5 different companies in the same building, I have decided to
create different OpenVPN connexions for the various companies (RoadWarrior).
In order to have a precise filtering, I have assigned all
Hi,
I wanted to know if It is a normal situation to have systematic "WPA rekeying"
on a pfSense AP?
I am seeing this on my 2.1 box :
Jan 11 09:56:28 hostapd: ath0_wlan0: STA 64:20:0c:9c:69:08 WPA: received
EAPOL-Key 2/2 Group with unexpected replay counter
Jan 11 09:56:28 hostapd: ath0_wl
Le 20 nov. 2012 à 11:07, bsd a écrit :
> Le 20 nov. 2012 à 10:47, Eugen Leitl a écrit :
>
>> I need to firewall a 100 MBit/s symmetrical site and
>> want to reuse my ALIX 2D3 with Soekris VPN accelerator
>> as this is a nonprofit with no budget.
>>
>> Can t
Le 20 nov. 2012 à 10:47, Eugen Leitl a écrit :
> I need to firewall a 100 MBit/s symmetrical site and
> want to reuse my ALIX 2D3 with Soekris VPN accelerator
> as this is a nonprofit with no budget.
>
> Can the hardware still handle pfSense 2.1 without
> choking?
Yes - no problem
> I'll be ge
Hi Jeremy,
I think you should create a queue of 100Mbit/s and call It "Internet" (or
whatever you wish).
then create a sub-queue based on "Internet" and give It the amount you wish
20Mbit/s for example.
Then you should be able to do what you want by setting the rules correctly on
your LAN or
Le 31 août 2012 à 08:29, Pankaj Kumar a écrit :
> I am using PfSense 2.0.1 with Multiple WAN
>
> I have a DSL modem with a public IP address (201.206.x.x), and I have a web
> server in my internal network (192.168.0.50).
>
> I set up the modem to forward requests to port 80 and 8090 to my web
> Do you have a copy from the log files of the error message ?
> It may be what you indicated, My Identifier should not be "My IP
> Address" when doing fail safe.
> Best regards
> Nicolas
> Le 02/08/2012 20:56, bsd a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have set
Hi,
I have setup a CARP firewall with one phase one IPsec and two phase two
tunnels.
I seem to have problem with CARP handover (when master fails and Backup takes
the lead) and IPsec tunnel. Handover goes ok, but IPsec tunnel seems to fail
beeing transfered from Master to Backup.
In genera
Le 4 juil. 2012 à 17:48, bsd a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I have setup a simple aDSL line and used a D-Link DSL-320B modem in order to
> connect It.
> This modem will be used as a backup line.
>
> My modem is setup as a bridged.
>
> When I connect my computer to the ethe
Hi,
I have setup a simple aDSL line and used a D-Link DSL-320B modem in order to
connect It.
This modem will be used as a backup line.
My modem is setup as a bridged.
When I connect my computer to the ethernet interface of the modem, I am
directly assigned the Internet IP (public IP).
Wh
Le 3 juil. 2012 à 21:59, Vick Khera a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> The level of service we provide is on par or better than commercial
> vendors. For most of our customers, much better, because commercial
> vendors will rule out the firewall and tell you to ha
> Op 12 jun 2012, om 23:55 heeft bsd het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I have an ISP which is providing me a bloc of public IP's /27and a GW
>> (managed GW inside the given bloc).
>> Generally in order to filter in such situation,
Hello,
I have an ISP which is providing me a bloc of public IP's /27and a GW (managed
GW inside the given bloc).
Generally in order to filter in such situation, I create a bridge on the WAN
and filter on the bridged if.
I wanted to know if It was possible to use CARP in such situation and h
Le 12 mai 2012 à 21:20, Michael Schuh a écrit :
>
> After more investigation, I would rather suggest using
> /boot/loader.conf.local and add the following :
>
> cpufreq_load="YES"
>
>
> You also need to add :
>
>
> kern.timecounter.hardwarei8254
>
> in System: Advanced: System Tun
Le 11 mai 2012 à 19:49, Michael Schuh a écrit :
>
>
> 2012/5/11 bsd
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to have PowerD tuned correctly with a Lanner device that I am
> resaling.
>
> By default sysctl dev.cpu gives the following :
>
> # sysctl dev.cpu
> dev.cpu.0.%des
Hi,
I am trying to have PowerD tuned correctly with a Lanner device that I am
resaling.
By default sysctl dev.cpu gives the following :
# sysctl dev.cpu
dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU
dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu
dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=\_PR_.P001
dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=none _UID=0
dev.cpu.0.%par
Le 26 avr. 2012 à 21:40, Pete Boyd a écrit :
> Hi. I'm choosing a miniPCI wireless card from www.msdist.co.uk to go in
> an ALIX 2D3. The only cards there that appear to be supported by
> FreeBSD 8.1 are the Wistron DCMA81 (Atheros AR5213A), Wistron CM9-GP
> (Atheros AR5213A) and the Compex WLM54
Le 23 avr. 2012 à 09:37, Pim van Stam a écrit :
>
> On 23 apr. 2012, at 00:38, bsd wrote:
>
>>
>> Le 22 avr. 2012 à 22:26, Seth Mos a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Op 22 apr 2012, om 22:03 heeft bsd het volgende geschreven:
>>>
Le 23 avr. 2012 à 07:38, Seth Mos a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Op 23 apr 2012, om 00:38 heeft bsd het volgende geschreven:
>
>
>>> If the CPE has a bridge mode you could configure the WAN in pfSense and
>>> configure the delegated /64 on your lan. Theoretically.
>&g
Le 22 avr. 2012 à 22:26, Seth Mos a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Op 22 apr 2012, om 22:03 heeft bsd het volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hello my friends,
>>
>>
>> My ISP is providing a full /64 network which looks similar to
>> 2a01:e35:2436:7e20::/64
>
>
Hello my friends,
I have just started playing with the 2.1-DEVELOPMENT to try to figure out how
IPv6 is implemented.
I am not an IPv6 expert, so I am learning as I implement this on my home
firewall.
My ISP is providing a full /64 network which looks similar to
2a01:e35:2436:7e20::/64
By
Hello,
I would like to know if you planned to incorporate 802.11n in the next release
(2.1) or if you have post-poned this to a later stage ?
I will soon re-order WLAN cards and I wanted to know if It was better going for
"n" WLAN cards or still use "g"…
Thanks for your answer.
–
Le 16 févr. 2012 à 20:26, Tom S a écrit :
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have 2 servers installed with PFsense 2.0.1, running Active/Passive with
> Carp.
> I would like to have the ability to send alerts by mail, all kinds of alerts,
> like Failover, problem with VIP, problem with Carp etc.
>
> Has so
Which wiki are you refering to ?
Thanks for your reply.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel Davis
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
> On Behalf Of bsd
> Sent: Thursday, 15 December 2011 7:4
Hi,
I am bit off topic for the pfSense list, but since I want to be compliant with
the FreeRadius package deployed on the pfSense system… I guess It is ok to ask
that question here.
I want FreeRadius to provide distinct VLANs to each of my clients based on the
parameters defined in the Free
Le 14 nov. 2011 à 21:39, Chuck Mariotti a écrit :
> After converting a network of computers to use a fairly popular 3rd party
> email service (not my decision unfortunately), users are experiencing very
> odd issues with email (POP and SMTP based). The 3rd party says we should try
> different
Hi,
Just for my info, is there a way to avoid these message about arp changes ?
They are due to WAN interfaces (WAN / OPT) beeing bridged together
WAN <--> OPT
BRI_WAN
myname.abc.biz kernel log messages:
+++ /tmp/security.UyYMRtdm 2011-11-05 03:01:05.0 +0100
+arp: 1.2.3.4 moved
Hi,
I wanted to know if It was possible to load balance an OVPN connexion through
multiple DSL links connected on the same box. Not yet sure if the server is
going to be on the multi DSL side or the other (I guess both are possible as It
is intended to be permanent OVPN links).
I went throug
Hi,
I wanted to know if you knew any VPN compression PCI-32 card compatible with
pfSense / FreeBSD ?
Thanks for your reply.
G.B.
––
-> Grégory Bernard Director <-
---> www.osnet.eu <---
--> Your provider o
On 25/10/2011 15:17, Kurt Buff wrote:
AFAIK, the H200 (and I believe any of the H* series including the
H300) is Windows-only.
I ended returning the one we had when I tried to install ESXi on it.
If you find differently, I'd sure like to know.
Kurt
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 04:49, Korves, Tim
Le 6 oct. 2011 à 09:12, Dominik Schips a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I have three WAN interfaces on my pfSense 2.0 (amd64 full install):
>
> WAN1 - static IP (ADSL ISP1 by PPPoE)
> WAN2 - static IP (SDSL ISP2 with public /27 network)
> WAN3 - dynamic IP (Cable ISP3 by DHCP)
>
> I want OpenVPN access
Hello,
I would like to know, based on the recent FBSD evolution / implementation of
802.11n protocol, what will be your level of support for this long awaited
feature of FBSD / pfSense ?
Thanks for your answer.
––
-> Grégory Bernard Dire
Le 19 sept. 2011 à 17:43, bsd a écrit :
> One more precision, the hard drive I am trying to install pfSense on is a
> Toshiba MK2576GSXZ
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Le 19 sept. 2011 à 16:41, bsd a écrit :
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am facing a problem installing
One more precision, the hard drive I am trying to install pfSense on is a
Toshiba MK2576GSXZ
Thanks.
Le 19 sept. 2011 à 16:41, bsd a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I am facing a problem installing a lanner 7522 (celeron based).
>
> The device is based on the following
Hello,
I am facing a problem installing a lanner 7522 (celeron based).
The device is based on the following hardware specs :
Processor: Intel Celeron M 1GHz
Chipset: Intel 910GMLE + ICH6M
---
I have only managed to install the device with an embedded kernel.
The multiproc refuses to boo
Le 19 sept. 2011 à 14:11, Jim Pingle a écrit :
> On 9/19/2011 7:36 AM, bsd wrote:
>> I have a question regarding available options for kernel install.
>> We use to have three kernels available (+ the Developer one), and It seems
>> that now we are only having
Le 19 sept. 2011 à 14:11, Jim Pingle a écrit :
> On 9/19/2011 7:36 AM, bsd wrote:
>> I have a question regarding available options for kernel install.
>> We use to have three kernels available (+ the Developer one), and It seems
>> that now we are only having
Hi,
I have a question regarding available options for kernel install.
We use to have three kernels available (+ the Developer one), and It seems that
now we are only having 2 + developer kernel.
Options available are :
• Symetric multiprocessing kernel (more than one processor)
• Embedded ke
40 matches
Mail list logo
