On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Thinker Rix wrote:
> Can this flame be put to an end or continued via private mail?
>>
> But: Interpreting your message, I guess you are participating at this
> mailing list with a mail reader that just pours all incoming mail into one
> folder - which is not "the p
I second this motion
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Yehuda Katz
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 3:30 PM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: [pfSense] [MOTION TO END THREAD] NSA: Is pfSense infiltrated by
"big br
dnesday, October 09, 2013 3:30 PM
> *To:* pfSense support and discussion
> *Subject:* [pfSense] [MOTION TO END THREAD] NSA: Is pfSense infiltrated
> by "big brother" NSA or others?
>
> ** **
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Thinker Rix
> wrote:
>
> C
:* pfSense support and discussion
*Subject:* [pfSense] [MOTION TO END THREAD] NSA: Is pfSense infiltrated by
"big brother" NSA or others?
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Thinker Rix
wrote:
Can this flame be put to an end or continued via private mail?
But: Interpreting your message, I
*I think I speak for everyone who was a member of this list before
10:20 AM EST today when I say that this discussion does not belong
here and we would all like it to stop.*
I guess it is wise to just speak for yourself, instead of using this
cheap rhetorical trick to pretend being a major