Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread FrancisM
On Wednesday, 11 May 2016, ED Fochler wrote: > Unless your ISP is involved, you’re not going to do link aggregation or > BGP. I’m guessing you’re doing NAT on both of these WAN connections, and > not just routing. In this case I would recommend separating traffic by >

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread ED Fochler
Unless your ISP is involved, you’re not going to do link aggregation or BGP. I’m guessing you’re doing NAT on both of these WAN connections, and not just routing. In this case I would recommend separating traffic by user, or by port/protocol. I had a DSL and T1 arrangement a while ago and

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread Bryan D.
On 2016-May-10, at 10:14 AM, WebDawg wrote: > Usually the only thing that you > can do in this situation is put your connection at its lowest setting > and control the connection from there. The problem with this is that > the connection will always be this lowest speed.

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread WebDawg
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:14 PM, WebDawg wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:29 AM, FrancisM wrote: >> On Tuesday, 10 May 2016, Vick Khera wrote: >> >>> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Randy Morgan >>

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread WebDawg
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:29 AM, FrancisM wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 May 2016, Vick Khera wrote: > >> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Randy Morgan > > wrote: >> >> > Having said that there is some question in my mind

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread FrancisM
On Tuesday, 10 May 2016, Vick Khera wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Randy Morgan > wrote: > > > Having said that there is some question in my mind as to how this > actually > > works. Some of what I read indicates that the

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread Juan Bernhard
El 10/05/2016 a las 10:58 a.m., Vick Khera escribió: On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Randy Morgan wrote: Having said that there is some question in my mind as to how this actually works. Some of what I read indicates that the aggregation actually causes the LAGG port

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread Vick Khera
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Randy Morgan wrote: > Having said that there is some question in my mind as to how this actually > works. Some of what I read indicates that the aggregation actually causes > the LAGG port to, effectively, operate on QOS functionality,

Re: [pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread Randy Morgan
Unless I have miss read the documentation, the short answer is yes you can. This setup is done under LAGG. Here you can combine multiple ports with different configurations, one of them is port aggregation. If the aggregation works like it does on other routers and switches then this should

[pfSense] Aggregated WAN traffic

2016-05-10 Thread FrancisM
Dear All, Im a fan of pfsense and been using it the old days 14years ago using the CLI script in freeBSD OS. Now Im using the latest release of this web GUI in my home lab network including my home network. I just want to know if I can aggregate two WAN Connection to become one huge uplink?