I have been writing some code and can't seem to get consistent behavior
from 1 loop cycle to another in a FORALL
basically when I set some variables initially before going into the loop,
the loop cycles and at end of loop before it comes in again i reset the
variables to what they need to be.
Subject: A truly embedded camera...
Does any one *REALY* want to get *THIS* up close and
personal with the Rebol crew? :-) Beats Rebol on a Cell
Phone doesn't it? :-)
http://www.givenimaging.com/
...the investigational system consists of the:
M2ATM capsule, a patented, disposable v
Wow, I sent this message yesterday at around 8:00PM. Why did it take almost
24 hours to make it to the list?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 8:01 PM
Subject: [REBOL] 'dynamic append' Re:
> What you're trying to do is use
That looks like a bug. -Carl
>Anyway, I can prove that there is no context hierarchy:
>
>>> a: 1 b: 1 c: 1
>== 1
>>> obj1: make object! [
>[a: 2
>[obj2: make object! [
>[b: 2
>[obj3: make object! [
>[c: 2
>[]
>[]
>[]
>>> blk: [a b c]
>=
[
REBOL[
version: 1.0.0.5
file: %/home/volker/edis/screbol-0.1.6.4/public/test.r
date: 24-Jul-2000/19:33:50+1:00
author: "volker"
purpose: {
here is a context-simulator to show what happens with
binding. AFAIK. in a way Elan is right with inheritance,
virtual function tables in c++ are created
What you're trying to do is use dynamic variable names. Some languages like
Perl allow this. Perl calls them symbolic links and lets you do things like
--
$var = "variable_name";
${$var} = "hello!";
print $variable_name;
--
outputs: "hello!"
The reason your "append (joi
Hi Volker,
no problem, but I didn't receive it (why?)
Ladislav
>
> wrote
> [REBOL] Words, Bindings and Contexts. (5)
> which is of course
> (C) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :)
>
> sorry, Ladislav,
>
> must have thought Re's are now counted :)
> concentration..
>
> Volker
>
>
Hey, I did get only Jeff's message from this thread! Could someone
at RT check if they get errors from my account?
(Don't need to send me the thread, I'll have a look at it in the
archive. In the meantime, I'm sorry if someone asked something to
me and I did not answer yet.)
Regards,
Gabriel
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 23-Lug-00, you wrote:
r> good to hear from you.
I'm glad to talk with you too; I hope to get your book soon, too,
so I'll be able to send you some bug report. ;^)
r>> This was REBOL 1.x behaviour. REBOL 2.x is very different in
r>> this regard; the word lookup is
In the previous sections I answered some questions regarding
Contexts.
The lifetime Contexts:
*
The Global Context should last forever, Local Context have
indefinite extent, which should mean, that if there were no GC
bugs, they should last as long, as they are accessible
wrote
[REBOL] Words, Bindings and Contexts. (5)
which is of course
(C) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:)
sorry, Ladislav,
must have thought Re's are now counted :)
concentration..
Volker
I've always thought that someone could use REBOL/view to
create an animated colored map presentation which
demonstrates the nature of contexts...
-jeff
> In the part 4 I forgot to introduce a special kind of Contexts:
>
> f) Dangerous Contexts. Example:
>
> f: func [x] [] sp
Hello, rebol community!
I have the following rebol-script:
-
REBOL[]
probe "hello, world!"
-
when I say at command prompt "rebol/rebol -q hello-world.r" it works of
course. But when I say "echo 12345|rebol/rebol -q hello-world.r" it hangs!
Could somebody be so kind as to explain what ha
In the part 4 I forgot to introduce a special kind of Contexts:
f) Dangerous Contexts. Example:
f: func [x] []
special-context? first first :f
CRASH
I obviously cannot claim that Same-context? works in this case.
Now I supply another interesting function:
; actually, Thomas Jensen wa
14 matches
Mail list logo
