Hi Tim,
| What would be the use for that feature?
|
It's usefull e.g. when you MOLD or SAVE what you want to LOAD easily:
mold none
== none
mold/all none
== #[none]
type? load mold none
== word!
type? load mold/all none
== none!
save/all %/c/test.r none
load %/c/test.r
== none
Dear Alain,
either d = 'x [bx/pane/offset/x: - tmp * sf/data ] [ ; how to improve that
?
bx/pane/offset/y: - tmp * sf/data ]
The function MIX-PAIRS as defined below takes two PAIR!s and a word of value
X or Y. Depending on the latter MIX-PAIRS returns a new PAIR!
Hi Bruno,
doing it in the SELECT-way is nice but you should consider using it with the
/SKIP-refinement. Without this you may end up with surprising results if one
value may occur in value-1 and value-2 position as in
;
that's-life: [cats birds cats birds
Hi [Ladislav Romano Gabriele],
On monday, 10-Jun-02, 07:48:53, Ladislav Mecir wrote:
my essay http://www.rebolforces.com/~ladislav/argstake.html describes how
Rebol functions take their arguments.
Not that for one single moment I thought I've discovered a not so well-known
rebol behaviour
to the networking problem as well,
because everyone who wants to work with such class based objects knows
where to get the class definition.
Or am I missing something?
Regards,
Christian (Ensel :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list, please send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe
Hello Christian Morency,
some months ago I worked an a similiar project, you can find my code at the
bottom of this mail. It's not very complete, but it may inspire you in a way
or two :)
As I mentioned in another post earlier, I've been working for the past three
weeks on a pseudo class
Hi Terry Brownell,
on wednesday, 07-Mar-01, 23:48:09, Terry Brownell wrote on subject
"[REBOL] Complex Series XML Parsing?":
so that we get...
thexml: [
tag1"This is some string"
tag2"with embedded tags"
tag1"and another"
tag3"with this string"
tag1"ending with this
Hello list,
I just noticed that 'parse-xml exposes the words 'parent and 'paroot to the
global context.
I'm not sure if this has already been addressed by someone - however, I
consider this to be a bug, therefore I cc'd this mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you think?
Regards,
Christian
Hello Nigel,
Whilst I could probably write a (long) solution I'm sure there must be an
elegant couple of line Rebol solution - one problem is that there may be any
number of links in the post.
I'm not sure whether it's elegant :)
At least it's a couple of lines and does the trick for
Hallo Nigel,
Andrew's version is even shorter than mine, doing it by just
'change -ing instead of 'remove -ing and 'insert -ing.
Nevertheless, here's my version with additinal comments:
parse post [
any; apply the following rule 0 or more times
[
to
give a hint to what it can do some day in far future.
xml-data: {?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?
!DOCTYPE test [
!ENTITY ME "Christian Ensel"
!ELEMENT che:money ANY
!ATTLIST che:money che:currency CDATA "USD"
che:am
Hello Robert,
on 10-Jul-00 You wrote:
How do I do this now?
Simply write Your own 'to-file :)
Okay, this may look like:
my-to-file: func [
"Converts to file value, skipping NONEs."
value "Value to convert."
/local block val
][
either block? value [
block: copy []
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 06-Jul-00, You wrote:
I am just curious if running rebol with command line parameters work for
you? I get following error:
REBOL --do "print 123"
works fine for
REBOL/Core 2.3.0.1.1 22-Jun-2000 ; i.e. Amiga 68020+ version
As does DEMO disabled
REBOL/View
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 04-Jul-00, You wrote:
Your results differ from mine, I would suggest you to try once
more...
How embarassing! The differences are because of a typo and wrong
cutting/pasteing, sorry!
--- Start --
a: 0 f: func [] [a]
o1: make object! [a: 1 g: func [] [a]] o1/g
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 04-Jul-00, You wrote:
The explanation #2:
[...]
, but Source then created a bit different representation of that.
Oh, I like this explanation.
I already learned that 'source doesn't always show the excact source
code which was assigned to a word (e.g. a: make
Hi Rebols,
while playing around with objects, I trapped into this:
f: func [] [print "Hello!"]
f
Hello!
spec: []
== []
append spec to-set-word 'attribute
== [attribute:]
append spec 5
== [attribute: 5]
append spec to-set-word 'function
== [attribute: 5 function:]
append spec :f
==
Hi Ladislav,
1) you shouldn't redefine Function (a Rebol mezzanine), but that
didn't cause your trouble
This was just to use speaking names for the example :)
2) the problem has nothing in common with contexts.
Obviously I'm still not able to assume correctly where my problems with Rebol
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]!
On 03-Jul-00, You wrote:
[...]
The two blocks look the same, but they aren't.
[...]
That's what was irritating me ...
But now the context thing comes in for real, ;-)
Look at the following console session
-- Start of console session --
a: 0 f: func [] [a]
o1:
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
On 03-Jul-00 You wrote:
[...]
Your approach should preferrably be:
append spec reduce ['func third :f second :f]
[...] ^
This one will suit my needs, I think.
third :f is even better than first :f, of course!
Thank You very much!
19 matches
Mail list logo
