gmassar:
Your list didn't really disappear:
if you do this..
>> list: make list! [1 2 3 4]
== make list! [1 2 3 4]
>> first list
== 1
>> remove list
== make list! [2 3 4]
>> first list
** Script Error: Out of range or past end.
** Where: first list
>> list
== make list! [] --- Is it gone??
>>
Ryan:
I had problems loading before and found out that if you already have a
'View directory, it will not load. To correct, you must delete or move your
previous view directory and then try again.
Hope this helps,
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Thanks Joel!
I appreciate your take on this.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] while statement problem Re:(3)
Hello, Joe!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Petr:
>
>
Petr:
Yes it worked. Sorry for the typo. Thanks for your help.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 11:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] while statement problem Re:(3)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Petr
Petr:
Thanks. Your solution led me to conclude that you can't do this:
prime : true
while [ prime and ... ] [ .. ]
Seems rebol does not interpret 'prime as true in this case. The workaround
is to state:
while [ (prime = true) and (...) ] [ .. ]
You have to explicitly state the co
Anyone,
Just learning REbol and need some explanation as to how to do this:
while [ prime and test <= square-root number ] [..]
Rebol complains that i can't use an and . Can multiple conditions be placed
in the while clause ??? If so, how do you do it?
Thanks in advance!
Joe
Elan,
I've got REBOL/command (Experimental) 0.6.14.3.1 on my windows machine. I
got this version before they started charging for it. There used to be a
link to download this version a few weeks ago, I think. But now, that link
is replace with a "Buy It" link.
Joe
-Original Message-
All,
Does anybody know how different the experimental (free) Rebol command is
as compared to the one offered for $250.00?? I was wondering if the
experimental came close. If it did, what the heck, why pay for one that has
maybe only a few bug corrections (crossing my fingers).
Thanks,
Joe
Perhaps what's needed is a new '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Maybe that would do
it.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 10:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] ENOUGH already
Puh-lease! I subscribed to this list
E... maybe if we package Rebol with the words "Microsoft" in front of
it, people will accept it more readily.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] The Industry N
Carl,
Good job! I was hoping someone would come up with something like this.
This is a REAL time saver. What do you mean "more to come?" I like
surprises.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2000 6:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PRO
I've had the same problem... Thought I was doing something wrong. My send
and read commands, when sending mail or fetching a web site work on my
computer at home, but flunks out on my Lan based computer at work. This is a
real show-stopper!
Joe
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
Just wanted to know if anybody knows why the new experimental Rebol/command
has no windowing capability like Rebol/view. Seems they should combine the
two together to make it more versatile.
Thanks,
Joe
13 matches
Mail list logo
