Hi,
what you uncovered here is very interesting indeed. Have you reported it as
a bug?
Once can summarize your observation like this:
list: [1 2 3 4]
== [1 2 3 4]
list2: next list
== [2 3 4]
list2
== [2 3 4]
head list2
== [1 2 3 4]
clear list
== []
At 03:10 PM 12/9/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I would like to propose that empty? should be useable with blocks and
return true if the block doesn't contain an element.
empty? []
== true
Good idea. empty?'s current functionality is supplied by the word tail? We
don't
At 07:43 AM 12/9/99 +, you wrote:
I, for one, disagree.
Go ahead and produce the RTF file, but let's not always drop to the lowest
common denominator (and lose some very nice features in the process).
I really don't see how those features that make PDF more powerful than RTF
are important
Hi Ingo,
Please, not RTF. Not everyone has RTF capabilities. (I for one haven't
found an editor on Linux that understood RTF _AND_ was worth having around.)
How about Postscript, then? Or just the all-in-one-html?
Have you tried AbiWord? http://www.abisource.com/
Elan
Hi Mr. newsletter, you wrote:
what's the difference between these two things:
char? #'i'
== false
--- that is # (single quote) i (single quote)
type? #'i'
== issue!
Hope this helps,
Elan
char? #"i"
== true
--- that is # (double quote) i (double quote)
Thanks.
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote
I recall:
block1: [do func[f [any-function!]] [print "OK"] func [x] [print "OK"]]
== [do func [f [any-function!]] [print "OK"] func [x] [print "OK"]]
do block1
OK
Why isn't this answer good enough for you?
you refer to the difference between block1 and block2. Once
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
I give you another example:
Your composite function:
composite: func ['f 'g][func [x] compose [(f) (g) x]]
f: func [x [any-function!]] ["OK"]
g: func [x] [:x]
x: func [x] ["OK"]
fg: composite f g
[correcting the typo:]
result: fg :x
** Script Error: x is missing its x
Hi Ladislav,
let me introduce my twin cousins, Tom and Sam:
source tom
tom: [func [x] [print "OK"]]
source sam
sam: [func [x][print "OK"]]
type? do tom
== function!
type? do sam
** Script Error: none is missing its x argument.
** Where: func [x][print "OK"]
Why? Here's the explanation:
Hi Rob,
you have the option of using
a: make block! form a
I imagine that make block! form a will run faster than load. Load tries to
bind words to the global context which make block! doesn't. Therefore you
get these two different behaviors:
do load {print "hi"}
hi
Here print is bound to
At 03:08 PM 12/6/99 +0100, you wrote:
Hi, Elan,
Your curried doesn't really work.
My curried *really* works. Granted, it's a template, a baby version of a
curried function. It was only meant to illustrate to Russ what currying is
about. But, it *really* works, which cannot be said of the
Hi Keith,
there are two fucntions, insert and append. You quote from the dictionary,
I cant' access it right now, but I think it should say something similar to
what REBOL reports when request help for insert:
Inserts a value into a series and returns the series after the insert.
Arguments:
Hi -jn-,
If my recollection serves my well (hm, hm) then xjohnson explicitly
requested that the text be inserted before the closing HTML tag. Still,
thanks for pointing it out.
Elan
At 12:00 PM 12/6/99 -0600, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi xjohnson,
You can use
parse webpage
At 07:15 PM 12/6/99 +0100, you wrote:
Three cheers for Oliver! - he succeeded to circumvent the GC fault - which I
was blind enough not to see.
That is wonderful, Ladislav.
What is not so wonderful is that your curry function - as I foretold in my
previous email from last night, indeed does do
Hi Ladislav,
thank you for being so responsive.
[L]
Ah, you didn't look at my description of the second argument?
Sorry, I was in a hurry and actually didn't. I think both versions - with
and without additional argument block have a place in my big heart ;-) -
and could easily be combined in
At 01:44 PM 12/5/99 +0800, you wrote:
question of load function
try below:
data: load [REBOL [title: "load testing"] "hello" 34 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]
print get head data 'title
REBOl return a ERROR,but please refer to manual "Loading data" part
(www.rebol.com/manual/opeloading.html),it should
Hi Russell,
your example also demonstrates another REBOL feature. While [EMAIL PROTECTED]
would normally be identified by REBOL as an email address, i.e. of type
email!:
type? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== email!
which is not of type url!
url? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
== false
you can insist that you want
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
oz: make object! [
zz: use [zz] [
func [/set set_zz] [either set [zz: set_zz] [zz]]
]
]
I like your creative application of my suggestion to use 'use contexts in
order ot hide variables. Well thought out.
Remember, however, Gabriele's and
Hi xjohnson,
You can use
parse webpage [ to /HTML cursor: (insert cursor {some new text. ^/}) to end]
where webpage is a string containing the webpage, such as the result of doing
webpage: read %somefile.html
Here is an example:
webpage: { HTML
{HEAD Some head stuff
{more head
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote,
Ciao, Gabriele,
to the best of my knowledge, Ciao translates to something like goodbye. ;-)
- a nice idea. The problem here is that this approach is static, i.e.
non-re-entrant, because it uses only static storage for object parameter,
namely the code block of method, so
Hi Russ,
you wrote:
What does "curried" mean in the context used here?
In "Introduction to Functional Programming using Haskell", Richard Bird
explains currying like this (p. 12):
"A useful device for reducing the number of parentheses in an expression is
the idea of replacing a structured
Hi Ladislav,
we are making progress. That's good and encouraging.
you wrote:
But think for the second time:
1. Is the samef expected to return a function? Hint: Yes
Absolutely!
2. Does it really return a function? Hint: No
What?? Of course it returns a function. Oh, my. What do you
Hi Eric,
you wrote:
The fact that "unauthorized"
dereferencing of words seems to do something useful at times is definitely a
trap, though, and there should be much more warning about this in the
documentation.
However, shouldn't 'f have been indefinitely extended, when f was returned
as part
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
look at this example:
;Identity function, simply duplicates it's input
id: func [x [number!]] [:x]
;Increment function, increases it's input by one
inc: func [x [number!]] [x + 1]
;The same function as argument
samef: func [f [any-function!]] [func [x] [f x]]
You
Hi Ladislav,
I wrote:
(Oh,
and if I concur with my conclusions, please, please make sure that it
really does fail!)
Read: (Oh, and if YOU concur ... )
Am I being a little self-centered here? ;-)
Sorry,
Elan
Once again Hi Ladislav,
I believe I've figured ou why you think my function should have problems
with reentrancy.
You see that my function sets the object word of the methods object of the
object it is passed. Therefore, whatever ! is doing, it relies on the
expectation that the methods/object
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
-
Of course, it works.
But try to rewrite the code like this:
sumnum: func [other [object!]] [ (do ! other get-num) +
(do ! self get-num)
and see what happens
---
Do you realize that REBOL supplies
Hi Ladislav,
I have to run now. Just wanted to mention that I believe you choose a
somewhat strong language,
---
I am sorry, but your approach is worth nothing,
it's too trivial.
---
when the triviality you complain about is due to the function you had
supplied, namely
At 10:24 PM 12/1/99 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Elan,
my point I wanted to state was: if both 'probe s are the same
you can't use the probe to show that it's not duplicated, am I
right?
Absolutely.
Elan
regards
Ingo
Those were the words of [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Ingo,
yes, you do get the same
Hi Gabriele,
thanks.
At 01:53 PM 12/2/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:48 PM 12/1/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It uses use
contexts:
To avoid problems with the garbage collector, my hide.r show work
fine here.
Mmm... show = should.
Hi
Hi Graham,
you wrote:
Sorry you didn't like my script!
I wrote it last night while watching Star Trek Voyager with the ultimate
intention of using Rebol to update it, so to keep it simple ( which is
the only way I know how to write! ), kept all the data in one block.
Don't take Andrew's likes
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
Reminder?: function [Date [date!]] [Reminder] [
Reminder: Daily? Daily_Schedule Date/Time
if none? Reminder [
Reminder: Weekly? Weekly_Schedule Date
]
Reminder
]
If I understand your code correctly, then there can
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
There are two problems with your solution:
a) it is relying on the persistence of func-1, func-2, ..., which is not
garanteed now (problem with indefinite extent and garbage collector...)
Where do you take that from? func-1 and func-2 are both referenced by
do-something,
At 12:48 PM 12/1/99 +0100, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It uses use
contexts:
To avoid problems with the garbage collector, my hide.r show work
fine here.
Hi Gabriele, what is hide.r and where do I get it?
Elan
Hi Ladislav,
you wrote:
We have gained a lot. CF:
no-copying: same? get in a 'message get in b 'message
==true
no-copying: same? get in a/message 'get-num get in b/message 'get-num
==true
I see what you mean. I'd call it a bug ... When objects are inherited,
objects they contain should not be
Hi guys,
Sorry, can't remember all the names. Have little time.
Someone observed that descendant objects inherit their ancestor object's
function implementations and variables. This leads to inflated code. The
following mechanism can be used to avoid inheriting some code. It uses use
contexts:
Hi Carl,
you wrote:
data: copy/1024 socket ;-- data up to 1024 units
Shouldn't that be copy/part socket 1024? Or is this an undocumented
shortcut I've overlooked so far?
TIA,
Elan
Hi Jerry,
you wrote:
I'm fairly new to REBOL and wouldn't be surprised if there is a much better
way to do it.
Fairly new, huh? And programming like a veteran nice work. One little
detail:
substr: func [s k n /local a]
[
a: ""
for i k k + n - 1 1 [a: join a pick s i]
a
]
Do you
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
Graham wrote:
Um, Andrew, don't you think an attribution is in order here since I
sent you my Tv-scheduler reminder script this morning!
Oh, yes. Inspiration (and most of the schedule) provided by Graham. I
just did the hard work! :-)
Hard work? In REBOL? What? ;-)
Elan
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
spent the next two hours writing my script,
[snip]
It must have taken me, oh, about 3 hours to write that script (emails
were sent at about 3:45 PM),
2 + 3 / 2
== 2.5
fun: 'programming-in-REBOL-for-two-and-a-half-hours
==
Hi Keith, you wrote:
Am I right in thinking that the only two ways to simulate associative arrays
as they exist in languages such as Perl and Python are by
1. Making an object and using it's fields for what would be the indexes
2. Using the select keyword on a block, like so:
data: ["key1"
Hi Gabriele,
you wrote:
b: 2
== 2
a: to-set-word 'b
== b:
a 3
== 3
b
== 3
:a
== b:
Another little gem.
Thanks,
Elan
At 02:12 PM 11/29/99 -0800, you wrote:
Here are three more questions:
1. x/:i syntax can get but not set values in a block... why?
Because REBOL does not permit the notation :i:
Since i is a word, i: would be setting the i as a reference to some value,
at the same time :i is dereferencing
Hi Gabriele,
REBOL 1.0 was tail recursive, and it was SLOW. This is because, as
Joe Marshall expalined to me, handling tail recursion is not an
easy thing to do. I'd like to see tail recursion back in REBOL,
but I'm not sure if I'd want the complexity of the interpreter to
increase. I'd prefer a
Hi Gabriele,
glad to see you back in good "form" (pun itended ;-).
you wrote:
That behaviour is not due to form:
Correct. What is it due to?
Apparently, the way REBOL treats words in parentheses has changed since
version 1:
Here's what version 1 used to do:
word: "meaning"
meaning
var2:
Hi Mikael,
one simple way to do it:
result: make block! 100
remove-these: [
"get rid of this"
"remove this"
]
foreach line read/lines %test.txt [
foreach pattern remove-these [
if found? find line pattern [clear line]
]
if length? line 0 [append/only result line]
]
Note that
Hi Mikael,
I forgot to mention:
Use write/lines to write the results of my previous example back to file:
write/lines %filtered-log.txt result
Elan
At 02:33 AM 11/29/99 +0100, you wrote:
I've just started out with some REBOL programming and the first task I was
planning to solve is this:
I
Hi Alexander,
Your return value is strange. I tried it on my machine and I get:
list: [
[[%readme.txt 4-Sep-1998/5:37:08+1:00 139 file "^/"]
[[%user.r 26-Nov-1999/17:08:58+1:00 330 file "^/"]
[]
== [[%readme.txt 4-Sep-1998/5:37:08+1:00 139 file "^/"] [%user.r
Hi Graham,
you're right, it appears that functionality is still missing.
At 08:08 PM 11/28/99 +1200, you wrote:
The user's guide says with regard to string values
^[words...] executes a block
yet, print "^[print now]" on 2.2.0.3.1
results in
[print now]
rather than executing the block.
Hi John,
REBOL gets a stack overflow, yet the obvious
`imperative' version of the program produces the correct answer.
If you consider a data set of `dozens' or `hundreds' of elements
to be the limits of `reasonable', then, yes, REBOL does just fine.
I routinely use datasets of `thousands' or
Hi Ladislav,
At 06:32 PM 11/26/99 +0100, you wrote:
Hi, Rebols! tried this: trial: func [par] [ do func [/local p] [
p: par make object! [ prt: func [] [print p]
] ] ] trial2: func [par /local p] [ p: par make
object! [
Hi Andrew,
I had written:
Which part surprises you?
to which you replied
That Interface/Test returns the value of 't! In C++, this wouldn't
work, as the function 'Test_Implementation wouldn't be able to find 't
in 'Interface. It's disturbing to me as a C++ programmer, but viewing
it as a
Hi John,
I think Jeff's example (subject: [REBOL] Functional programming in REBOL Re:):
use [pod][
do pod: func [x][
any [all [zero? x 1] all [odd? x x * pod x - 1] pod x - 1]
] 20
]
which, when executed evaluates to:
use [pod][
[do pod: func [x][
[
At 08:46 AM 11/23/99 +, you wrote:
OK, OK I have been dually chastized :-)
The point that I was trying to make was: I feel that were REBOL to follow
the pricing/Marketing example of Turbo Pascal, and price their product so
that it is redally available to the masses combined with a top
Hi Will,
you wrote:
no answer = Well does it mean it doesn't ??
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 1999 08:55:51 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [REBOL] does CGI work on Macintosh ?
Hi all 8)
Well, would the rebol 2.2 work as CGI
with WebStar
Hi x1cthach,
you wrote:
set-net [ (to-url rejoin [user "@" service]) (to-url service) none none none
none]
Shouldn't you have the smtp server's address (mail.host.dom, or
smtp.host.dom) in third position of set-net [ ... ]?
You now have 'none instead. Perhaps that's the problem?
Elan
Apparently Assembly sent off to emails today:
one was sent off at
22 Nov 1999 14:34:07 -0500
the other was sent off at
02:41 PM 11/22/99 -0500
I received the second one earlier today, the first one which was apparently
sent off seven minutes earlier just arrived now. Has anyone else noticed
Hi John,
1. The examples and scripts submitted to REBOL reflect the preferences that
the most active REBOL programmers have acquired over years of imperative
programming.
Unlike other functional or hybrid programming languages, REBOL has rapidly
attracted a surprisingly large following of
Hi Petr,
how are things going?
Maybe calling REBOL a functional language is not as uncommon, as is your
hidden name, "a142808", hmm? ;-)
In all fairness, John did previously sing off with his full name: John
Curtis. My guess is that SELMA is stripping off his name (like it does my
name.
Hi Russ, you wrote:
print to-string ((to-integer "12345") + (to-integer "23456"))
You don't need the to-string since print accepts any-type:
print (to-integer "12345") + (to-integer "23456")
35801
Hi,
you wrote:
i am not going to be a student for ever ...
... but once you have finally graduated (how much longer, man...) some
other REBOL enthusiast might be a student, right?
Wouldn't "how much" play a role?
Perhaps there can be an educational discount? Or free for non-commercial
use
Hi Petr,
you wrote:
Are we near its release date? :-) Will specs be released before /Command
release
or just with it?
I prefer with it ;-).
Elan
CAN WE END THIS PLEASE !!..
Why so nervous?
Elan
Hi guys,
I think that REBOL/Command should be priced between US$29 - US$49. This is
a product that should pay for itself through volume, not through small user
base + high price per user.
People should be able to get REBOL/Core for free, test it, like it, and
then *painlessly* upgrade to the
At 12:57 AM 11/18/99 +0530, you wrote:
i have installed REBOL in /usr/local/ ...
when i used REBOL for the first time it created user.r in
REBOL_HOME ... which hapens to be .. /usr//local/rebol...
now me being root .. i have absolutely .. no problem in using the user.r
.. but .. now i have
Hey Kat, you wrote:
It took 5 tries here, because when i typed in "yes" , nothing happened.
Finally the download happened, but when i clicked on the d:/rebol/readme.htm
, it locked up IE5. After 10 minutes, nothing had happened, so i rebooted.
Now what?
I take it that you were trying to use IE5
Hi Jeff, you wrote:
[snip]
The first line there confuses IMPORT-EMAIL. Set-words are
being looked for, (from: subject: etc..) and the 'from' on
the first line in UNIX mail format and eudora format doesn't
have a colon after it. The fix is to either skip a line, or
skip forward to a
Hi max82, you wrote:
Hi,
another newbie question:
how do I use the system object? Could somebody please explain to me how the
reboldoc script works? I previously assumed that it did a "help" for each
function, but there isn't a help command anywhere, so what does "help"
_really_ do?
try
Hi Phil, you wrote:
[snipped around]
j: 3
my-array array[j]
my-array: array[:j]
I get the error
Try
j: 3
== 3
my-array array reduce [j]
== [none none none]
Elan
Hey fleet, you wrote:
Symbol is coming out with some CE systems. Would REBOL work on those?
REBOL currently supports CE systems (pretty much all incarnations, see
download page.)
Elan
Hi Russ,
you wrote:
protect 'help
help: none
** Script Error: Word help is protected, cannot modify.
** Where: help: none
parse "this is a test" [thru " is " copy help to end]
== true
print help
a test
Guessing: protection works by monitoring the native assignment function.
parse doesn't
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
Rebol has made this exceedingly hard to do (oops, meant "easy"). Try
something like this to keep your vars local to your function.
display|image: func [
src
text.align
alt
/local src text.align alt
] [
block of code
]
Once you declare an argument arg within a
Hi Bo,
BTW, where did you see this example?
In the file filter-info which is automatically generated in the mail root
directory when messenger runs for the first time. Here are the first lines
of this file up to (including) the line in question:
Filters: A filtering block should return false
-- Hi folks,
Has anyone noticed and previously reported the fact the + and - used as prefix
operators
act asimmetrically? + performs an addition on two arguments, - turns the first argument
into a negative value, discards it and returns the second argument:
- 3 4
== 4
Do you find this to be
Hi Bard,
Aha.
you wrote:
The problem is that I'm working with things I don't understand and I can't
find good documentation. I found some code to connect to an email
server. Something like this:
--
x: [
scheme: 'pop
user: "srad"
Hi Jeff,
Okay, so I stole a second or two today to tweak the
look of the chat room.
The chat room is not being advertised on rebol.org's index?
What's the URL again?
TIA,
Elan
Hi Jeff,
extreme.
Elan
At 11:56 AM 10/14/99 -0700, you wrote:
[snip]
Well, you gotta tell PARSE what exactly it is you want it to
do. Here's a quick and dirty approach.
result: copy []
[using the newer code for foreach ...]
foreach [rule thing] [space-piece " " end-piece 'end][
At 06:19 AM 10/13/99 +0100, you wrote:
How do I access Arrays ??
[snip]
for i 1 3 1
[
marray/i/i: 1
]
doesnt work
... and that is because array is not a type. Arrays are blocks. The word
array is a convenience function that implements blocks containing blocks.
The resulting block can be
Hi Brannon,
I'm sure you've figured it out by now. In case you're still surprised:
you wrote:
In the program below, the print stmt: print join "Hello" name
does not occur until after the 2nd ask even though it is coded before the
2nd ask
[snip]
name: ask "What is your name? "
Here you are
At 08:14 PM 10/11/99 -0700, you wrote:
I know that pick secret-words 1 is choosing "camel" and I am typing "camel"
so I don't know why the first option of the either is not being chosen. Some
guru please help!!
[snip]
either (equal? guess [pick secret-words 1])
The block around pick
At 11:43 AM 10/11/99 -0700, you wrote:
Howdy Petr:
In REBOL and "hw" communication ... thread Jeff mentioned there is going
to be some option for us to support something, but I clearly don't
understand, what's it gonna be about. :-) Jeff, could you tell, or is it
just a secret
Hi Kat,
you wrote - very much to the point -:
I like it :-)
Robert, do you think it could be merged with XML-RPC/SOAP?
Elan
Hi Petr,
you wrote:
if (last path) "/" [append path "/"]
You have to be careful with 'last. if path is empty, then 'last will cause
an error message, whereas (back tail path) will evaluate to an empty block:
path: []
== []
if (back tail path) [print "wow."]
wow.
if (last path) [print
Hi Russell,
good to hear from you. Look, you are confusing two things:
1. There is a REBOL type called path!
2. Hierarchical Filesystems commonly refer to a notation that specifies a
hierarchy of directories (or folders) as a path, i.e. c:\windows\system.
The REBOL user's guide sometimes speaks
At 06:47 AM 10/10/99 -0700, you wrote:
grumble
I have not seen any mention of a regexp library for REBOL yet
/grumble
Have you checked 'parse yet? (See online documentation to get rolling).
Elan
Hi Terrence, you wrote:
You would think REBOL would print out a bound function just as it did
the bound value... otherwise you might think it has no value at all.
1. What you can do is use source, probe or print mold :f
f: func [x y] [x = y]
source f
f: func [x y][x = y]
probe :f
func [x
Hi Terrence,
you wrote:
load http://rebol.org/file/recursive-dir.r
load http://rebol.org/file/recursive-dir.r
connecting to: rebol.org
[...]
== [
recursive-files: function [path [file!]] [files file file-list] [
files: load path
file-list: to-block 1 ...
recursive-files
Hi Ingo,
which Scheme book are you reading - the one by Dybvig?
I recall that some time ago (nine, ten months?) someone on this list did
confirm that REBOL is tail recursive. I don't recall who said that or how
knowledgeable that person was ...
Elan
At 10:40 PM 10/8/99 +0200, you wrote:
Hi
At 11:23 AM 9/30/99 +0100, you wrote:
Quick question. Is there a ping protocol available?
As far as I recall the problem with ping is that under Unix based systems
ping has to temporarily assume super user privileges.
Elan
Hi Slong,
you wrote:
Starting with the last reveision, SuSE is selling through CompUSA at $29
US. I think SuSE doesn't get much revenue this way, but the book and
six CD are sure moving!
I believe SuSE reported $15Mio. in revenue for last year. That's not bad
for printing a few CD's,
Hi Paul,
you wrote:
I agree hole heartedly Elan. In the back of my mind I am seeing "Turbo
Pascal". I don't know if you where around when it was popular, but I was in
college at the time.
I was an Assembler programmer when it came out. Played around with version
1.0, liked it, but
Hi Petr,
you wrote:
snip
However, REBOL Technologies should distinguish several cases of pricing:
- single users, wanting to use REBOL/Command non commercially,
$0.0
- commercial single purpose usage - e.g. - some set of scripts running on one
server machine
how about client machine? In both
Hi guys,
parse permits recursive rules:
rule: [ something | something-else | rule ]
I can also say:
parse/all code [some rule]
I understand how [some rule] works. It has allowed me to do everything
I have been trying to do with parse so far.
On the other hand, I don't understand when I
Hi -jeff,
you wrote:
I could go on all day... :-)
... please do. I sure enjoy reading it ... :-)
Elan
Hi Porter,
I pretty much agree with most of what you say here. I'd say our differences
are interesting but irrelevant for this thread. A last thought: I believe
there are many ways REBOL Tech can generate income for itself through
REBOL, even if they never sell a signle copy. The basis for any
At 11:41 PM 11/18/99 +0100, you wrote:
I've got a little parse problem. I try to parse something like
a1=1, a2=2, a3=3, a4
where a1 to a3 have to be present, a4 may or may not be there,
Two questions:
1. If we have a1= does the next digit have to be 1, or could we have:
a1=2, a2=3, a3=8 ...?
At 11:41 PM 11/18/99 +0100, you wrote:
I've got a little parse problem. I try to parse something like
a1=1, a2=2, a3=3, a4
where a1 to a3 have to be present, a4 may or may not be there,
it is unspecified, which is at which position, and they may be
on subsequent lines, without the commas
At 10:30 PM 11/3/99 -0700, you wrote:
An interesting and insightful story about REBOL can be found in the
latest release of "Linux World" at:
http://www.linuxworld.com/linuxworld/lw-1999-10/lw-10-rebol.html
Is it still scheduled for Monday, November 8th? Can't wait ...
Elan
At 09:13 PM 11/4/99 -0500, you wrote:
When trying to do a "do %reboldoc.r", I received the following result:
Script: "REBOL Dictionary" (2-Nov-1999/23:06:40)
328 words in dictionary
** Script Error: Cannot use path on none! value.
** Where: print info/size
==
Please let us know when the error
201 - 298 of 298 matches
Mail list logo
