> how about?
> 1to10
> -1to-10
> .1to.10
>
> Is using n"to"n that different from using n"x"n for pairs? It is
immediately
> obvious that it is a range, ( in English at least).
>
> Other ideas?
"to" could be exclusive and "thru" inclusive like parse. Don't know what you
do about the range start th
AllenK wrote:
> I like the use of "-" but I feel it will cause confusion if a negative is
used in the range.
>
> -1--10
Actually, the lesser value should be first. So this should be:
-10--1
It does look a bit odd for negative numbers. Perhaps both ".." and "-"
could be allowed? Then
The "to" has won me.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 21, 2000 16:37
Subject: [REBOL] Enhancement Request - Range! datatype Re:(5)
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I like the use of "-" but I feel it will cause confusion if a negative is
>
