[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Howdy Petr:
>
> > /Apache, REBOL/Serve ... can be licenced, no problem here, although
> > all other Apache modules are free IIRC
>
> There are commercial pay for SSH modules for apache, for instance.
As I said - I can find great value in REBOL being present fo
You're right.
The license agreement needs to be fixed. I'll try to get it done today. We've got a
million things going on here and missed it.
View is not currently being distributed openly because I knew that its early beta
revisions would keep breaking your code. We don't want to carry legac
Howdy Petr:
> /Apache, REBOL/Serve ... can be licenced, no problem here, although
> all other Apache modules are free IIRC
There are commercial pay for SSH modules for apache, for instance.
> Multitasking,
> threading, async messaging, shell access should become part of /Core
> imho
On 25-May-00 04:59:38 lorrainemagnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PART I.
> REBOL is the "language of the free" yet IT is not free.
> The following are 3 incompatible statements made by
> Carl & Company.
[snip]
all very interesting.
you should see some of the early lava/rebol promo/hype.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
my opinion:
/Core, /View - should become fully transferable, no licence restrictions
- other case is imho unacceptable ...
/Apache, REBOL/Serve ... can be licenced, no problem here, although all
other Apache modules are free IIRC
Multitasking, threading, asyn
PART I.
REBOL is the "language of the free" yet IT is not free.
The following are 3 incompatible statements made by
Carl & Company.
--
On the posting "Website & Direction", Carl says:
Yes. This is our "first wave" business direction. It's a
fertile ground that we think has great potent
