> But then this (the example below) explicitly lists the
> refinements in the function body. I think the "ultimate"
> solution would process an arbitray list, as with a loop. It
> is fairly short though :) and IS a step up from 'if
> statements, esp for more than 2 refinements.
>
Michael Jelinek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/15/2000 04:04:34 PM
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/15/2000 04:04 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: [REBOL] best means of passing refinements from main to helper
function? Re:(2)
Howdy, Michael:
I don't have the E-mail.
Can you resend that original one?
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tag
> Howdy, Michael:
>
>The following approach is exactly elegant, but it gets
I meant to say "ISN't exactly elegant"... sorry. That
wasn't very elegant either! :)
>the job done and it's fairly short. I think it's kind of
>cute.
-jeff
/2000
> 03:30:03 PM
>
> From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]@MailAndNews.com on
> 09/15/2000 03:30 PM
>
> Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent by: Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [REBOL] best means of
TECTED]
cc:
Subject: [REBOL] best means of passing refinements from main to helper
function?
I want to know the best way to propagate refinement selections (or their
lack)
to a function which actually does the processing for them.
deduction: func [/use-month month-to-use /use-day day-to-use]
I want to know the best way to propagate refinement selections (or their lack)
to a function which actually does the processing for them.
deduction: func [/use-month month-to-use /use-day day-to-use] [
rejoin [ "file-"
either use-month [ month-to-use ] [ now/mont
