RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

But that gives exactly the same screen reader problems that display:none was giving. http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ScreenreaderVisibility Jake On Tue, 4 Jul 2006 23:37:07 -0700 (PDT), "Minh D. Tran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > or you can try > > visibility: hidden; > > hope that

Re: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

On 7/4/06 11:37 PM "Minh D. Tran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > or you can try > > > > visibility: hidden; That still reserves the space on the page (or message) though, yes? Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro

RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

or you can try   visibility: hidden;   hope that helps...Jake Badger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Try this instead of display none:style="text-indent:-9000px"On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:37:50 +0930, "Bojana Lalic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:> What do you mean by indenting off screen?> > -Original M

RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

Try this instead of display none: style="text-indent:-9000px" On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:37:50 +0930, "Bojana Lalic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What do you mean by indenting off screen? > > -Original Message- > From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jak

RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

What do you mean by indenting off screen? -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jake Badger Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:22 PM To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do? Don't

RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

Don't tables need captions for screen readers? If you set the captions as display none then screen readers will also ignore them. Couldn't you indent them off screen? Jake On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 15:14:57 +0930, "Bojana Lalic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why? Because accessible tables should have c

RE: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

Why? Because accessible tables should have captions but I don’t want it to be displayed…        This is the caption       From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Pennell Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:05 PM To: wsg@webstandards

[WSG Announce] Some links for light reading (5/7/06)

This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements This email covers: - Links for light reading - Events - Jobs -- LINKS FOR LIGHT READING -- CSS Reboot participants far from standards based

Re: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

On 7/5/06, Bojana Lalic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And gmail is still displaying the caption. How do I prevent it from doing this? By the way, the reason why I am using inline styles is because of Hotmail etc…Gmail doesn't support the display property, even on inline styles - see here fo

[WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

Hi All   I’ve got the following code:      This is the caption     And gmail is still displaying the caption. How do I prevent it from doing this? By the way, the reason why I am using inline styles is because of Hotmail etc…   Cheers   Bojana  

[WSG] what happened to the svg "standard"

hello, i've been away from the list for a while taking care of some pressing business. while i was away, it came to my attention that mozilla and opera were going to support the svg format natively in their new browser releases. i could hardly wait. i had some big plans. i guess you could

[WSG Announce] Ten Questions for Gian Sampson Wild

This is a one-way list for WSG Announcements Hi all, Just starting another series of "Ten questions for..." I'm very excited to have finally cornered Gian Sampson Wild for an interview: http://webstandardsgroup.org/features/gian-sampson-wild.cfm Gian

Re: [WSG] Opera 9 and standards support

James Ellis wrote: FYI, Opera 9 final has been released and it has a special section for all those standards folks out there :) http://www.opera.com/users/glenn/ Lots of other notes about improvements here: http://www.opera.com/docs/changelogs/linux/900/index.dml I'm sure the windows & mac pages

RE: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

I have it taken care of, thanks for the support. I am using XHMTL 1.0 Strict so I have id's linking up and have passed validation. -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christian Montoya Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:51 AM To: wsg@

Re: [WSG] IE and image markup white space

Designer wrote: Dear Listees, I have a number of thumbnail images in a div, presented as three rows. (see [1] for example) My problem is that, in IE, I get a small horizontal line appearing in the gap between the images. Someone told me ages ago that the trick was to remove all whitespace

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

On 7/4/06, Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello all, I haven't encountered a site where a customer asked that I used named anchors in the form of the old… This is the format they have and want to stick with… ... Ok. Aside from the fact I know I have to go rename all these anchor names

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

On 7/4/06, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you are using a doctype where named anchors are separated, ... * deprecated. I meant to say deprecated. I need more sleep. -- -- Christian Montoya christianmontoya.com ... portfolio.christianmontoya.com

Re: [WSG] email stripping out the css from tables?

On 7/4/06 2:29 AM "Suliana Abbay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Another helpful article on creating great HTML e-mail messages.. > This article have managed to sum up all the important info. into a short > article as opposed > > http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/design/html-emails Only

RE: [WSG] email stripping out the css from tables?

Another helpful article on creating great HTML e-mail messages.. This article have managed to sum up all the important info. into a short article as opposed http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/design/html-emails Hope this helps. Suli -Original Message- From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.

RE: [WSG] WCAG 1.0 AAA Rating

Felix Miata wrote: > It may or may not be. There's typically little or nothing > that graphics > can offer to improve the communication of the Congressional Record or > Shakespeare's fiction. A designer typically will think so regardless > whether it really does or not. This conclusion is drawn f

Re: [WSG] The Standard Way...???

Hi Ryan,named anchors can just be replaced with Ids on your target elements, like so; What is a consumer proposal? How do I qualify for a consumer proposal? Who presents my consumer proposal to my creditors?What is ... ?voila :) -Nick Harrishttp://www.pixelenvy.co.uk

[WSG] The Standard Way...???

Hello all, I haven’t encountered a site where a customer asked that I used named anchors in the form of the old…  This is the format they have and want to stick with…   Top of Page What is a consumer proposal?     How do I qualify for a consumer proposal?       What

Re: [WSG] email stripping out the css from tables?

Bojana Lalic wrote: > I used css initially but then the client complained that html wasn't > displaying the content as it should be. Instead of displaying two > columns it only displays one and also strips out all the css. [schnipp] > Any tips regarding the use of css and tables in emails would be