Re: [WSG] font standards today

On 06/08/24 15:15 (GMT-0500) Collin Davis apparently typed: > On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:50 PM, Felix Miata wrote: >> Those hundreds of years are history. With the web began a new paradigm. >> Gone were the canvas size limitations of rock and paper and wall and >> billboard. > And they were replaced

Re: [WSG] font standards today

On 06/08/24 14:57 (GMT-0500) Collin Davis apparently typed: > On Aug 24, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Felix Miata wrote: >> . How many active, in use, non-educational CSS files can you >> find on my site where main content text is set to something other than >> the user's default size and family? I count 0

RE: [WSG] IE layout problems

> of course, i still have that annoying IE movement bug... > > Tim I think the margins on the #primary menu list was causing the list to wrap (just slightly) because of width:auto. To fix it make the changes below. In the style.css file: 1) Replace all your definitions beginning .menu with:

Re: [WSG] help with divs

Thanks to Gasper and L. J  Lacey for your helpI have it fixed and now I can get onto my other problems...Thanks againOn 8/30/06, L-J Lacey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hi, I think it's cause you're not clearing your floats.  If you're not sure about clearing floats thisis a good place to start fr

Re: [WSG] IE layout problems

nevermind, i managed to get it fixed i had another margin declaration in another stylesheet that was affecting it :\ thanks for your help! of course, i still have that annoying IE movement bug... Tim TuteC wrote: > In FF I see the footer stepping over the content. I had that same > problem, be

Re: [WSG] IE layout problems

In FF I see the footer stepping over the content. I had that same problem, because I had problems with the "outer" div. But I didn´t see what exactly may be giving you that problem. Regards; Eugenio. On 8/30/06, Tim Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: thanks, i managed to get the footer flush at the

Re: [WSG] IE layout problems

thanks, i managed to get the footer flush at the bottom of the browser, however now it seems that negative margins aren't doing the trick ie, a negative margin-top isnt even moving the footer upwards (on the contrary, a positive margin-top doesnt move it downwards either..) link: http://abstract

RE: [WSG] IE (6 & 7) list bug.

> > May be the double margin bug, for floated elements? > I´ve encountered it few days ago... ;) That's a thought. But the lists that are being affected by the bug are not floated. When the list-style is changed on the ul, all descendant ul li's are affected. Example: List style changed her

Re: [WSG] IE (6 & 7) list bug.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/doubled-margin.html On 8/30/06, TuteC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: May be the double margin bug, for floated elements? I´ve encountered it few days ago... ;) Regards; Eugenio. *** List G

Re: [WSG] IE (6 & 7) list bug.

May be the double margin bug, for floated elements? I´ve encountered it few days ago... ;) Regards; Eugenio. On 8/30/06, Jough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you change the list-style to none (instead of the 1px transparent gif) on the #homepage ul on line 345 there will be a strange margin adde

[WSG] IE (6 & 7) list bug.

Take a look at www.pacetools.com and its css document: www.pacetools.com/css/primary.css.   If you change the list-style to none (instead of the 1px transparent gif) on the #homepage ul on line 345 there will be a strange margin added to the list items in IE 6 and 7.  I was able to find d

Re: [WSG] Help with Flowchart & Min/Max Width IE Win

Sarah Peeke (XERT) wrote: PROBLEM A The main problem appears to be the left margin when adjusting the browser size (I'm particularly interested in 800x600 and larger resolutions). The whole construction depends on font-size, so it is rather weak acro

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Tony Crockford wrote: it is driving every page on the site from the one stylesheet and there are a lot of list menus, hence the need to specifically identify them. Makes sense, but how many #maprolloverlist are there? I can only find one. Example: #maprolloverlist li#ro

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Tony Crockford wrote: it is driving every page on the site from the one stylesheet and there are a lot of list menus, hence the need to specifically identify them. Makes sense, but how many #maprolloverlist are there? I can only find one. Example: #maprolloverlist li#rollover1{position: abso

Re: [WSG] Safari issue

Title: Re: [WSG] Safari issue On 8/30/06 10:44 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello list, Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)? Code validates. http://66.155.251.18/joinmvp

Re: [WSG] Safari issue

Title: Re: [WSG] Safari issue On 8/30/06 10:44 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)? OK, so I found how to get Safari to show things properly

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Probably could do with slightly simpler CSS here and there, like less use of the entire ID/class chain to target a type of elements inside a container. Didn't look deep since that's not the real problem this time, but unless that stylesheet is also behind other pages, it se

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Tony Crockford wrote: Opera 9 makes big "little" boxes unless you allow the minimum font-size to be smaller than the default 9px, so that's an issue I need to address. So does Firefox. IE6 does the same when 'ignore font-size' is applied. My preference is 'minimum font-size = 14px" during reg

[WSG] Safari issue

Title: Safari issue Hello list, Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)? Code validates. http://66.155.251.18/joinmvp.com/ Thanks for your time. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist |

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: ...apparently help a bit across browser-land, but it's just a guess and it isn't complete. So, what is it supposed to look, and behave, like? Firefox 1.5.0.6 pretty much has it right. (as do other browsers I've quickly checked - I'll set browsercam on it now...) Opera

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Tony Crockford wrote: http://www.bclm.co.uk/map.htm Would be nice to know which browsers are rendered this page "correctly" at the moment, as IE6, Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 don't seem to agree on much. The addition of this... #maprolloverlist{width: 767px; /* neede

Re: [WSG] help with divs

Hi, I think it's cause you're not clearing your floats. If you're not sure about clearing floats this is a good place to start from: http://www.positioniseverything.net/easyclearing.html larmyia --- Germ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello > > im creating a website and ive encountered a few >

Re: [WSG] help with divs

Hello Germ, add overflow: auto to div#wrapper U could see in http://www.artideias.com/css/float-heigh.html a example and explanation but in PT, i try to explain and put a link to w3c were you find the answer. Is about the bottom edge of global content div will be the some of within elements bo

[WSG] help with divs

helloim creating a website and ive encountered a few problems...http://www.germworks.net/signmakers/the problem I have is that I cannot get the container or wrapper div to wrap around all of the other div tags like the title, content and the right tags... I am thinking it is because they are floate

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

On Aug 30, 2006, at 5:46 PM, Tony Crockford wrote: here's the test page: http://www.boldfishclient.co.uk/test/widthtest.htm Test of widths IE7 in IE7 the first div is only as wide as its content and it seems to be because it's inside an undimensioned floated div... which is the correct beh

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Tony Crockford wrote: http://www.bclm.co.uk/map.htm Would be nice to know which browsers are rendered this page "correctly" at the moment, as IE6, Firefox 1.5.0.6 and Opera 9.01 don't seem to agree on much. The addition of this... #maprolloverlist{width: 767px; /* needed for IE7 it seems */}

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Gunlaug Sørtun wrote: Tony Crockford wrote: should an undimensioned div stretch to the full width of its container or only to the width of its content? Anyway, it's a construction full of conflicts, so I wouldn't leave it to the browsers to sort out what the standards say about it. I'd rath

Re: [WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

Tony Crockford wrote: should an undimensioned div stretch to the full width of its container or only to the width of its content? If it's a float, or controlled by the behavior of an undimensioned wrapping float, then I think it should all shrink to the width of the non-positioned content. Any

[WSG] IE7 RC1 oddity

I installed IE7 RC1 this morning and checked out my important sites, where I found a strange problem relating to background images. (http://www.bclm.co.uk/map.htm - map div only goes part way because most content is absolutely positioned) I have since set up a test case for the cause of the pr

[WSG] Help with Flowchart & Min/Max Width IE Win

Hi all --- PROBLEM A I have a flowchart with background image that is causing me all sorts of headaches in (you guessed it) IE6 (haven't even looked at IE5.5 if anyone would like to take the plunge?): The relevant styles are at the top of the page for conve