http://www.tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/downloads/ies4linux-latest.tar.gz
tar zxvf ies4linux-latest.tar.gz
cd ies4linux-*
./ies4linux
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << Convert Word Processing files to HTML for free.
Open and exte
lt) is a standard though it appears to work in all browsers.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org/
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm
Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
wn weird-ass syntax.
My personal opinion is that when CSS2 came out it should have been
XMLised because CSS1 wasn't a significant legacy (even then, browsers
could have been instructed to parse both). CSS1 didn't even have
layout, aside from floats, and people hadn't invested nearl
Hi Mihael,
Is it true that if we use like , that div
could be invisible for screenreader software?
Yes, here's an article with a table of affected screen readers (scroll
down to the table)
http://alistapart.com/articles/fir/
Joe Clark seems to claim that Jaws does read it.
.Ma
ges.
If you're using XML and XSLT on the server though and only send out HTML
then the user will never know and there won't be any problems. "XML
driven websites" presumably also include ones that just use XML
internally. Server-side XML processing can either be ad-hoc
trans
Hi Nisha,
XUL is just a set of tags so make your Java code produce XUL tags
instead of HTML tags. Ajax is not required.
Try this forum instead of this web standards list, you'll get better
help there:
http://www.xulplanet.com/forum2/
.Mathew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << Convert your
you),
http://plutoblog.onesquared.net/2006/08/10/bear-patrol-2/
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << MSWord to Open Standards (HTML, DocBook)
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubs
and XHTML. My CSS classes are exception
names for machines to parse (though I should also include them as http
X-something headers; and it would probably be better to send
XML+client-side-XSLT rather than XHTML).
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org/ <&
understand this too.
These days I'd use png for lossless but hey maybe if you're not allowed
that format due to policy this would be a nice hack.
See http://jimmac.musichall.cz/weblog.php/Oops_Dept/MightyGIF
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << Converts Words Documents to
around
Python, XML Pipelines, and XSLT. It converts XML source files into
HTML+Javascript and -- for Firefox -- XUL+Javascript. Here's a company
blog entry about this...
http://plutoblog.onesquared.net/2006/08/10/bear-patrol-2/
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << Convert yo
nd SVG for everything else, as I believe you can
overlay text with that MS-only format.
i thank you for the time you spent on this issue with me. you'll
always be a knight in my book.
Awesome.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://holloway.co.nz/
***
tion to each other, and please also lobby government to make
"helping some dude on a mailing list" worthy of a knighthood.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org/ << MSWord to OpenStandards
**
The discussio
it needs to
display, and this may mean displaying scrollbars. You cannot expect to
control that while it's in the HTML. However, if you want the text to
scale with an SVG sized the same as the screen, then put the text _in_
the SVG.
.Matthe
efox for following
standards / praising Opera for disobeying.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << Opensource .DOC to HTML converter
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/m
ce.
oh well, i understand that a lot of catch up has to be done by the
browser industry. it's just frustrating at the moment. i must be
patient and continue my work and research, but i want it NOW! ;^)
What Firefox is doing is the correct thing, so IMO you're blaming
(causing scrollbars for this
element), and the text immediately follows it.
Your "-33em" margin then pulls the text up over the SVG, but it's not in
the scrolling area.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://holloway.co.nz/
*
s of
hacking on support for old browsers).
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org/ << MSWord to HTML or any XML
**The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some hints o
Any pointers would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Mark Harris
Technology Research and Consultancy Services Ltd
Wellington, New Zealand
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://holloway.co.nz/
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See h
Joseph R. B. Taylor wrote:
Can I ask you linux and mac users to take a look at this design please?
No problems here on Linux (Ubuntu 5.10, Gnome 2.12.1). No horizontal
scrollbars at 1024x768 and it looks consistent in both Firefox 1.5.0.3
and Konqueror 3.4.3.
.Matthew Cruickshank
http
Here's a friendly site to help make the case for standards...
http://www.hotdesign.com/seybold/everything.html
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://docvert.org << MSWord to Open Standards
**
The discussion list for http://webstandar
n%20heading1/pipeline.xml
It involves making some that string together some inbuilt
processes and your XSLT to make any XML or HTML. The end result is
controllable down to the tag and attribute, so and it can make clean
DocBook 5.0 too :)
.Matthew Cruic
.co.nz/docvert << convert MSWord to Open Standards
.Matthew Cruickshank
http://holloway.co.nz/
22 matches
Mail list logo