Hello everybody
Following the late discussion about fluid/elastic layouts, I was
wondered if somebody out there has some feedback concerning the use of
Microsoft's "Dynamic properties" proprietary solution for fixing the lack of
min/max-width support.
After some discussion with
ixed and found it relatively easy to use, although I would have
>>> rather not used it had there been another way. As far as min/max
>>> width, have you tried placing a nested div within the area to be
>>> min-width'd with padding of the amount to be width'd
Hi, Jonathan
I think it would be better if you don't add the inside your list
item. You don't need them.
Cheers,
Angela
-Message d'origine-
De : listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de
Jonathan Carter
Envoyé : jeudi 1 juin 2006 09:51
À : Web Stand
I always call the group of elements on the top of the page #header, but I don't
interpret it as a "positional" name at all. I believe that the header of a
document, whatever it is, groups important information of the same kind. We can
find on the header of a document, for example, the name of th
Hi, Robin
It’s not bad (even if I don’t understand where is
the interest in doing so.). The hidden content appears directly on the page with
_javascript_ disabled (so we have access to the content). What is less good is
that the text is not on an “h” tag or a paragraph and t
Hi, Tee
I must agree with your colleague. Of course "container" is en easy
recognizable kind of object name. We may image it is a block element. But even
this way, giving the tag to the selector prevents future designers (that may
work with your CSS) from misusing your style. If
