Re: [WSG] Credit where credit is due - (was) MSN in bad shape

, in the context of > its era, a standout product. Hear, hear! And thanks for saying it out loud. :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some

Re: [WSG] Credit where credit is due - (was) MSN in bad shape

, in the context of > its era, a standout product. Hear, hear! And thanks for saying it out loud. :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some

Re: [WSG] Bizarre overflow visible/hidden issue with link rollover

On 4/20/06 11:50 PM "Paul Noone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > The URL: http://www.ashm.org.au > > The problem: Roll over the About ASHM link in the dotted orange div with the > blockquote and watch it collapse. Then roll over the floated image to the > right and watch it expand again. Rep

Re: [WSG] Bizarre overflow visible/hidden issue with link rollover

>> The URL: http://www.ashm.org.au >> >> The problem: Roll over the About ASHM link in the dotted orange div with the >> blockquote and watch it collapse. Then roll over the floated image to the >> right and watch it expand again. Repeat as desired. > > Not happening here, FF 1.5 / MSIE 6 (Win XP

Re: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

On 4/21/06 2:04 AM "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I don't know what you have in mind here, unless it's related to coding - > semantics, correct structure, etc. Certainly I think it would be wrong to > exemplify on the basis of design itself - colours etc, as this is purely a > ma

Re: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

On 4/21/06 10:32 PM "Germ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > and i agree with the fact that you need to know what a badly designed website > is so u can learn from the errors and identify them so wen/ if u designed a > website and u get a similar error, u know how to fix the problem. > Makes se

Re: [WSG] Web pages needed for testing

On 4/21/06 10:44 PM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > On 4/21/06 10:32 PM "Germ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > >> and i agree with the fact that you need to know what a badly designed website >> is so u can learn from th

Re: [WSG] Linux and mac site check please

On 4/26/06 10:27 PM "Joseph R. B. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I hope a couple of you nice linux and mac users take a peek at this > page? http://ti.sitesbyjoe.com > > If you see any layout bugs, please let me know off-list. No obvious blowups on Safari/Panther. Rick *

Re: [WSG] launch of site: Yahoo! Tech

On 5/1/06 11:48 PM "Steve Olive" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > The whole design seems to be > falling to pieces in Opera. Yes it sure is not doing well in Opera Mac. What I assume are list items are overlapping vertically for

Re: [WSG] microsoft.com 100% valid

ugh, it seems - hmm? The stylesheet <http://i.microsoft.com/h/en-us/r/hp.css> CSS validator on the above <http://tinyurl.com/px42b> Not that I'm a CSS angel either, though! :-) Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://

Re: [WSG] Sitecheck please (fhcb.net)

On 5/12/06 12:30 AM "Florian Hamberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > please have a look to the following website: > > www.fhcb.net Please put a ref to the site in the subject. I appreciate it when I'm sorting out all my "sitecheck&

Re: [WSG] HTML editor for Mac

On 5/16/06 1:59 AM "Paul Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Was curious to know if anyone else is doing front end development on > the Mac? If so, what software are you using? There's the Freeway type of thing: Freeway 4.2 Is that sor

Re: [WSG] HTML editor for Mac

On 5/16/06 2:13 AM "Rick Faaberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> Was curious to know if anyone else is doing front end development on >> the Mac? If so, what software are you using? > > There's the Freeway type of thing: > > Freeway 4.2 &

Re: [WSG] HTML editor for Mac

On 5/16/06 2:42 AM "1802" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> BBEdit is probably the most well known but costs around US$175 >> (personally I like this one the best) > > I'm using BBEdit from a year, after a lot of (bad) time in GoLive. Interesting. I hear from a bunch of folks who dismiss GL

Re: [WSG]

7;s location? If you go here <http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/> and scroll way down and log in, you'll see the "List Archive" among many other items. Hth Rick Faaberg ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org

Re: [WSG]

ream of file cabinets and nuts tonight! ;-( Rick Faaberg Ps. Sorry, I don't remember the file cabinet thing. Maybe it was before I joined the WSG. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/

Re: [WSG] [WSG CMS] Etomite CMS

On 6/5/06 11:15 PM "Stephen Neate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Hope that helps :) Even while this discussion moves off to the CMS list, could everyone please post text-only format to this list please? I can't read all that tiny type and I just have to delete those posts! Please cooperat

Re: [WSG] Haley & White Space & Nav

On 6/6/06 3:52 AM "Ryan Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Address: http://www.rockitdevelopment.com/haley/ Tiny text. Deleted 'cause I can't read the text. ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webst

Re: [WSG] email stripping out the css from tables?

On 7/4/06 2:29 AM "Suliana Abbay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Another helpful article on creating great HTML e-mail messages.. > This article have managed to sum up all the important info. into a short > article as opposed > > http://www.thinkvitamin.com/features/design/html-emails Only

Re: [WSG] gmail is ignoring "display:none" - what to do?

On 7/4/06 11:37 PM "Minh D. Tran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > or you can try > > > > visibility: hidden; That still reserves the space on the page (or message) though, yes? Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgro

Re: [WSG] html validation: exactly what is it good for?

On 7/5/06 10:53 PM "Lachlan Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Please don't multi-post, there was no need for you to ask this question > on www-html as well, nor anywhere else. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-html/2006Jul/0017 Why? Is everybody automatically on both lists? I th

Re: [WSG] html validation: exactly what is it good for?

On 7/5/06 11:06 PM "Germ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I am not... > I didnt even know about the other list (i may join now) > > On 7/6/06, Rick Faaberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: >> On 7/5/06 10:53 PM &qu

Re: [WSG] image border inside

On 7/9/06 9:52 PM "Joshua Street" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > On 7/10/06, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Got it (sort of) works in Firefox, not explorer.. - >> Kind regards, >> Taco Fleur > > Here's one I quickly cooked up: > > http://sandbox.server-logon.com/jstreet/bordertes

Re: [WSG] Validation Tool

On 7/12/06 8:02 PM "Katrina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Anyone seen or used this before? Has it proven helpful? > Total Validator: http://www.totalvalidator.com/ I find it useful, and I emailed them asking about Mac browser testing. They need a few small donations to get the Mac browser

Re: [WSG] Rounded Corners

On 7/25/06 8:13 AM "James O'Neill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > bare with me here! I certainly will not! ;-) Rick ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for s

Re: [WSG] target=_blank

On 8/15/06 12:15 AM "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > Let them open a new window themselves. I do not assume my users are so > stupid. It's not a question of users' stupidity! It's a matter of if *I* feel that a new window is the best way to present the information! Sigh... Rick ***

Re: [WSG] target=_blank

On 8/15/06 12:30 AM "Christian Heilmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >>> Let them open a new window themselves. I do not assume my users are so >>> stupid. >> >> It's not a question of users' stupidity! It's a matter of if *I* feel that a >> new window is the best way to present the inform

Re: [WSG] target=_blank

On 8/15/06 12:36 AM "Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > What you "feel" is irrelevant to your user's experience > You are making a huge assumption, committed to a position you could > reconsider. > Change your feelings, fall out of love with this position it is > demeaning to many users. W

Re: [WSG] target=_blank

On 8/15/06 12:43 AM "Tony Crockford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: >> It's not a question of users' stupidity! It's a matter of if *I* feel that a >> new window is the best way to present the information! > > I'm aghast at such an attitude on a web *standards* list. You've missed the point.

Re: [WSG] target='anything' : was [target=_blank]

On 8/15/06 3:11 AM "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > So the message is that it's still OK to use frames in certain > circumstances, but under no circumstances is it OK to target them > (strict). No-one has ever explained the logic of this to me in any > convincing way. . . > > --

Re: [WSG] target=_blank

On 8/15/06 3:34 AM "Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent this out: > I'm waiting to see if target=_blank reaches 100 postslol > I wore out my delete button > > Bruce Prochnau > > bkdesign Abolutely HOT thread indeed. Are you keeping count? Rick **