bunch.
--
Tom Livingston
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
kewise slect appropriate fonts
> for the Mac and Linux.
How about:
* {font-family:"Times New Roman", "Tahoma", Arial, Times, Helvetica, serif,
sans-serif}
If a user doesn't have Times New Roman, or Tahoma, or Arial then they get
what ever they do have that's next i
On 3/23/06 10:40 AM, "Andrew Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vista has the ONLY version of
> Times New Roman that will display the text (all the letters used by the
> target languages) required by the digital library.
Fair enough.
Ah, Microsoft
-
as a
fixed width and height) was half off the top of the page. What did I mess
up?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.o
align:center; on #content’s container then add test-align:left; on #content.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Title: Re: [WSG]Problems
On 3/23/06 4:37 PM, "Minh D. Tran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
padding: 7px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
This on the hover as well?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Listers using Ubuntu (or other applicable flavors),
OFF LIST REPLIES PLEASE
I am setting up a Ubuntu machine for page testing. Is Konqueror the only one
worth testing with? Are there other popular browsers? Is FF rendering the
same as Mac/Win?
TIA.
Your humble Ubuntu Noob.
--
Tom
On 4/20/06 5:53 AM, "Paul Novitski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I use double-quotes myself, mostly I suppose to be
> consistent with other resource pointers in my work such as anchor
> href and image src.
Same here.
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
the question? Most likely... ;-)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to
Listers,
Are the page-break properties widely supported? Or at least in IE6, Safari
and maybe Opera (Win/Mac)? Any resources on their use besides the w3c site?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The
Saw this today...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12477036/from/RSS/
Anyone actually download it? I can only find Beta 2.
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http
n Safari. Tight layout!
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
tra-compressed - too much to my eye. heart.gif is still 5k+ but
visually appears overly compressed.
Otherwise works fine in Opera 9 Mac (build 3347).
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The
sonal browsing needs?
This is just for my own curiosity. Just wanted to know what the pros
actually use.
OFF LIST PLEASE!
Yes, I know how many replies I might get. Thanks for the concern. ;-)
Georg, let me guess... Opera? ;-)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlin
is is why I'm sending this to the list and
> not to you directly.
Oops!
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webst
ost after that time.
Who’s in the lead? Ahhh!, you’ll just have to wait! But I don’t think I’ll be giving away the ending if I tell you it isn’t IE. (SHOCKING!) :-)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
<--- 8-O
Kon:
2
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & getting help
**
On 5/21/06 12:12 AM, "Veine Vikberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wonder if I can run OSX on iMac Strawberry?
Yup. I run it on a Sage iMac at home...
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
On 5/23/06 11:09 AM, "Michael Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a transparency where her hair is transparent and shows the background...
Off the top of my head, blue screen/alpha trans. But this is Web standards
related how?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia
hits the browser. Odd that it doesn’t work in IE (sort of ;-) ). We use PNG in Flash a lot. All work as expected in IE.
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
Hi listers,
Run this up the flag pole in IE:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index.html
Anyone see why the first line in the first paragraph, which is next to "left
nav" is pushed over a bit?
Also, any general structure/presentation thoughts?
TIA!
--
Tom Livingston
Senior
On 5/24/06 4:46 PM, "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...that'll make it look right in IE - even if it isn't :-)
Thanks Georg! I threw that in a CC - trying to be "IE7 aware"
;-).
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Mult
Which goes to show how many site are poorly made... And I made one of those Flash site. I think it’s legible, though. We are replacing it soon. ;-)
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
OFFLIST
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
for some hints on posting to the list & get
On 5/30/06 2:49 PM, "Berman, Pamela E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A couple of people have asked me about it. If there is an answer, I'd love to
> pass it along.
Perhaps this:
http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flash/articles/swfobject.html
--
Tom Livingston
Sen
sive towards the poster. You
>> must be working from a different script, but I don't think it's
>> leading anywhere.
>>
>>
>> --
>> mark
>
> Mark, you're obviously a man of great character...
>
> N
The shear scale of knowledge here is hu
Hello listers,
Can you string font families like this:
Font-family:"News Gothic MT", Arial, Helvetica, sans serif;
In the old school ?
Like this:
Don't ask... :-(
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4
ing px) is here for comparison:
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index.html
Thanks a bunch!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list
On 6/9/06 12:14 PM, "Gunlaug Sørtun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You'll have to tweak the expression a bit for IE6, or run
> it in quirks mode.
Can't recall how to switch it to quirks mode...
Best way?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Me
On 6/9/06 1:29 PM, "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Tom, but the layout doesn't fit in IE6 at 1024 by 768. (WinXP).
> At least, not on my machine.
A little more info please. What doesn't fit? I just checked on mine and it
fits - even with fonts
s text/html instead of
xml.
It just made sense to me. Simple as that. All my other (recent) sites have
been XHTML Trans so feel free to persuade me otherwise. :-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 51
e using that already.
Thanks everyone for looking.
Bob, looks like you aren’t losing it after all... yet. :-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**The dis
On 6/10/06 4:50 AM, "Designer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am I cracking up?
Is it better now?
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/test/index2.html
[thanks Francky]
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.4
page as it is an internal intranet...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org
On 6/15/06 3:14 PM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I am banging my head against my desk on this one. IE6 is always
> printing a second blank page for a couple of Intranet reports here.
> Are there any typical things that would cau
I found this in a DW-created Stylesheet (New > Basic Page > CSS):
@charset "UTF-8";
I never noticed this before. Is this a good idea? Unnecessary?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.
On 6/19/06 2:45 PM, "Richard Ishida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-css-charset
>
> (esp. the section "By the way")
>
> hth,
> RI
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Log
On 6/8/06 3:57 PM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
FWIW, the news gothic I have on my system isn't serif, so arial would be a
suitable fall back.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.42
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
OK, now that was *good*! :-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4
>--
>
>Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231
>| fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
>Internet Explorer 6 is crap.
My apologies to the IE7 team for the above signature. That was an
internal/inside joke, never meant to be seen in the wild...
--
#x27;m stumped
thnx,
Warren
I don’t have time to make a local copy and test, but I did find an extra after the header.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
he Web Accessibility Toolbar
[http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/ais/toolbar/]
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http:/
gt; background-image: url("images/index_r2_c8_f2.gif");
> }
Is it me, or are all these states using the same bg image?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
On 7/13/06 9:32 AM, "Michael Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well Tom
>
> images/index_r2_c8_f2.gif is the same in all spec
>
> nothing will happen because you have the same image of course..
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> Tom Livingston
t in
his post or his code. I see some kind of image replacement, but didn't see
background-image position changes.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
On 7/13/06 5:42 PM, "Mike at Green-Beast.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is the actual experiment page:
> http://mikecherim.com/experiments/php_font_sizer.php
And Opera 9
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x
¹ve seen many more boring pages than this!
One comment, the ³Tokoriki Diving² header graphic is screaming for
anti-aliased edges!
Nice!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
> From: Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 09:25:18 -0400
> To:
> Conversation: [WSG] site check and code review
> Subject: Re: [WSG] site check and code review
>
>> I wanted to ask for a site check and code review please.
>> Any su
On 7/17/06 11:01 AM, "Dean Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <http://www.stthomasaquinasacademy.org/employment.mgi>
No time to look at the moment but wanted to say that that's one nice lookin'
form.
(Opera 9.01 Mac)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior M
any more?
>
> Thanks,
I believe FF2.0 is based on the Moz 1.8 tree, which is newer than FF1.5x
IIRC...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
Title: Re: [WSG] PDF link in XHTML???
On 7/21/06 2:57 PM, "Shlomi Asaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
whats the problem with pdf links in XHTML? and why u need js for them?
My thought exactly. We do it all the time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist |
On 7/21/06 5:05 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm guessing that the crux of his problem, though not stated, was that
> he wanted to open it in a new window
Target="_blank"
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Me
l.
>
> Ted and Thierry's script is a work around this limitation when using Strict
> Doctypes (and very well done IMHO).
Thank you Steve.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
On 7/26/06 10:05 AM, "Audano, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to easily program a site to automatically determine the users
> resolution?
How about %-based widths (fluid layout) and em/%-based font sizes. No
dependency on screen width what so ever.
iner appear empty, without a height value,
> when it contains all page content???
Are you using absolute positioning of the elements inside container? If so,
then container doesn't 'see' any content and thinks it's empty.
If this is the case, try floats (and clear them) or
How about this then:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/jello-expo.html
I have used this a couple of times. Works great.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
Listers,
Not sure if you saw this but...
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2006/07/26/678149.aspx
IE7 will be out for XP after all. Good news, IMO.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
ajority
will update "because M$ says I should"
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
Se
On 7/28/06 2:08 PM, "Donna Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SO I want my "stand-alone"
> IE6
For testing, I understand.
But FWIW, users will apparently be giving the ability to "go back" to IE 6
if they don't want/like IE7. Interesting.
ave grown - far too
> much :)
>
> Tina
>
>
>
>> ---
I really like this:
http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/jello.html
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
On 7/29/06 4:06 AM, "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Flash/FLV. I would recommend FLV over any of the
> previous 3.
Flash plugin is installed on more computers than any of the other mentioned
formats.
FLV, definitely.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Mul
ly appreciate it!
Corrie Potter
We have this as well. Flash wmode set to transparent/opaque AND absolutely no hover actions at all will usually fix it.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.
On 7/31/06 6:00 PM, "Micky Hulse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the example used from that article:
>
> WMODE(s):
> <http://snipurl.com/u6hx>
I noticed that they have no hover actions happening. Do hover actions cause
issues with opaque as we
On 7/31/06 8:25 PM, "Christian Fagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could I please get a Safari check on the following URL:
>
> http://www.waterwisetanks.com/index2.html
Looks good. 2 clicks up in text size.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Log
use of the Strict
doctype. I got around it by floating the images left. Worked like a charm in
my particular case.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
need to worry about adding a Mac
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.o
> From: Tom Livingston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 08:22:25 -0400
> To:
> Conversation: [WSG] Support for IE5/Mac? (was Browser stats)
> Subject: Re: [WSG] Support for IE5/Mac? (was Browser stats)
>
>> I'd then have a fight on my hands with
Ooops,
Guess I should read all my email first...
Sorry!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See
How about this?
http://www.getwebkit.org/
:-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http
The viruses.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
On 8/15/06 6:29 PM, "Peter Firminger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry folks, unfortunately, this all happened in early morning our time,
> otherwise it would have been stopped earlier.
Whatever. I'm just glad it's over! Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior
ing the :link psuedo-class?
Good question. I usually just do a and a:hover. How naughty am I?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
The discussion list
On 8/17/06 5:10 PM, "Patrick H. Lauke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just using "a" also affects any anchors you may have, such as
>
> Section 1
>
> Using a:link just targets proper ones.
[smacks forehead and utters "DOH!" loudly]
Title: Safari issue
Hello list,
Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)?
Code validates.
http://66.155.251.18/joinmvp.com/
Thanks for your time.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist
Title: Re: [WSG] Safari issue
On 8/30/06 10:44 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)?
OK, so I found how to get Safari to s
Title: Re: [WSG] Safari issue
On 8/30/06 10:44 AM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello list,
Please take a peek at this page in FF and Safari. Why isn’t Safari putting all the main nav links in a nice line like FF (and even IE6!)?
Code validates.
http
s, they must be having a relatively
poor internet experience when visiting the vast majority of sites.
I think this would exclude, however, users who need/use an extreme user
style due to visual impairment, etc.
This is not to say that I don't allow for text scaling, etc. in my pages,
but
On 8/31/06 2:18 PM, "Nick Roper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following page
??
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic | ph:
518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
Li
n, it still better allow me to put up a site that looks exactly
like I want it to.
If a user then needs to change it via user styles, for whatever reason, so
be it. I'm fine with that. But when I, and the vast majority of users, view
it it looks as intended.
--
Tom Livingston | S
t; don´t they?
> Regards and thanks in advance;
> Eugenio.
Correct. As does purevolume.com. It's not hard to whip up a swf that plays
mp3s...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
*
On 9/5/06 10:48 PM, "Ido" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> avi, asf, wmv, mpg, mp4, fla, swf, mov, 3gp
.fla is not a video format. Were you thinking of .flv? If so, you would need
a Flash .swf to play that.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph:
e's not coming up for me now. Maybe they didn't like your new images! ;-)
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://web
On 9/7/06 5:02 PM, "John 'Max' Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> www.project.ex16.co.uk
Min-width would be my only complaint. Narrow windows get crazy.
Very nice though.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 |
just
"decorative" - make it a background image:
Div.your divnamehere{background:#pink url(path to your image) bottom center
no-repeat;}
Change center to left or right, etc.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456
0)? "800px": "auto" );
Couldn't you just use 'height' ? I thought IE will treat that like
min-height...
??
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
**
On 9/13/06 1:17 PM, "Tony Crockford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well you could, but setting height isn't going to help with width is it?
>
> ;)
...morecoffeecan't....find....mug.
DOH!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Medi
...
Any links to examples/how-tos are appreciated. Off-list replies are fine if this will avoid a ‘mines better’ war.
Thanks!
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
wants to be
accommodating without, say, putting a possibly condescending paragraph on
the page about using your browser to scale fonts and also looking "techie"
with the sizing widget.
I think in this particular case, it's harmless and gives me a chance to
play.
Thanks for the link.
hash will be ignored too?
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines
Thanks for the links all.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
***
List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://w
Title: IE 7 rendering differences
Hi list,
Is there a significant/any difference in rendering (for testing purposes) between IE7RC1 under XP and IE7 under Vista RC x (or Beta 3 or whatever the latest incarnation is)?
Thanks
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph
usability is limited because of the precise mousework required. I realize this goes against the nature of what you're trying to accomplish, but is there any other alternative solution. I'd be interested in finding out if server side scripting could accomplish the timing issues.
--
Tom
On 10/6/06 7:16 PM, "Thierry Koblentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> iCab ship with the OS (honnest question, I don't know)? And is it
> considered an A-grade browser?
Not that I have ever seen in 16 years. And no.
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedi
rry to hear that. No, all threads are not debates but sometimes it gets
heated, or someone treads into Holy War territory with questions like
"What's the best way to specify font sizes in my style?"
I tend to watch for entertainment purposes...
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Art
[content]
Adjust style as needed for font, colors, etc. obviously. See it in action at
arobotics.com. Never did multiple bg images as you are trying.
HTH
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
Title: In the 'Wow, if only everyone did this" category...
View this in WebKit browsers only. (Hence the subject of this post):
http://decaffeinated.org/archives/projects/multibg/background-image.html
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.301
Title: Extra space in IE
Hello list,
http://66.155.251.18/mlinc.com/06/
In IE6 (haven’t checked 5.5 or 7) I am getting extra space below my footer. Anyone see why?
TIA
--
Tom Livingston | Senior Multimedia Artist | Media Logic |
ph: 518.456.3015x231 | fx: 518.456.4279 | mlinc.com
een the main and footer div - the space in the footer is gone now.
In fact, just adding worked fine. I tried adding the clear: both and display: block styles to #footer in the CSS but that didn't seem to work.
Tim
Thanks Tim. Weird. I figured I should clear the #topnav float before the rest.
Title: Re: [WSG] Extra space in IE
On 10/12/06 2:54 PM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom,
After playing around with the CSS and XHTML, it appears that your footer is not clearing your content.
I noticed you added on top of the page and I pasted that in betw
Title: Re: [WSG] Extra space in IE
On 10/12/06 3:09 PM, "Tom Livingston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other thing, In IE6 again. When I resize the window, the footer slides right – doubling the left margin. Refreshing brings back my correct left margin. Anyone?
OK.
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
