1.5 what.? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/06/2006 3:35:42 pm
Hi all
Is this valid css and if not what's wrong with it:
font: 2.2em/1.5;
Regards
Bojana
Global Summit 2006: Technology Connected Futures -- 17-19 October, Sydney, Australia.
Visit our website http://globalsummit.educationau.edu.au
Hi,I have never seen that value for font size before. However, if you wish to have it at that size, you can put 1.5em, rather than the math function you have. I'm guessing you are trying to get the value of 2.2/1.5 as the font size, which equals to 1.4666, round that up and you get 1.5, which is a
Bojana Lalic wrote:
Is this valid css and if not what’s wrong with it:
font: 2.2em/1.5;
the 2.2em/1.5 bit is okay and says font-sze 2.2em line height 1.5
times that...
(see:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2006/02/08/unitless-line-heights/
Eric's Archived Thoughts: Unitless
Hi Bojana! On 6/6/06, Bojana Lalic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this valid css and if not what's wrong with it:font: 2.2em/1.5;In terms of syntax you are correct... (if you mean to indicate font-size and line-height respectively), as per my generic example of 'font' shorthand below:
body {font:
I have never seen that value for font size before. However, if you
wish to have it at that size, you can put 1.5em, rather than the
math function you have. I'm guessing you are trying to get the
value of 2.2/1.5 as the font size, which equals to 1.4666, round
that up and you get 1.5, which
From what I understand, to use 'font' as a shorthand property you have to
include the size and font-name as a minimum (in that order).
I thought the order of properties was important?
for example, isn't weight listed first?
i.e
{font: weight style variant size/line-height font-name}
or do
On Jun 6, 2006, at 4:02 PM, Herrod, Lisa wrote:
From what I understand, to use 'font' as a shorthand property you
have to
include the size and font-name as a minimum (in that order).
I thought the order of properties was important?
for example, isn't weight listed first?
i.e
{font:
On 6/6/06, Herrod, Lisa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>From what I understand, to use 'font' as a shorthand property you have toinclude the size and font-name as a minimum (in that order).Yep!
I thought the order of properties was important?for example, isn't weight listed first?i.e{font: weight
actually, the order is as I stated before:
font-style font-variant font-weight font-size/line-height font-family
or do you guys find it works in any order?
I've never used it out of order, so I can't tell you, sorry!
Pulling out my copy of Eric Meyer (Definitive Guide) (incredibly
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Wow, That's fontastic!
thanks lachlan hardy
you're a fontain of knowledge
Fonting hell, Lisa! I think you may be endangering the fontamental
nature of this list. Posts of this type rarely carry the weight we're
accustomed to and we wind up being cursive towards the
On 6 Jun 2006, at 10:13 PM, Mark Harris wrote:
Herrod, Lisa wrote:
Wow, That's fontastic!
thanks lachlan hardy
you're a fontain of knowledge
Fonting hell, Lisa! I think you may be endangering the fontamental
nature of this list. Posts of this type rarely carry the weight we're
On 6/6/06 8:50 AM, Nick Gleitzman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fonting hell, Lisa! I think you may be endangering the fontamental
nature of this list. Posts of this type rarely carry the weight we're
accustomed to and we wind up being cursive towards the poster. You
must be working from a
Hi all
Is this valid css and if not whats wrong with it:
font: 2.2em/1.5;
Regards
Bojana
Global Summit
2006: Technology Connected Futures -- 17-19 October, Sydney,
Australia.
Visit our
website
13 matches
Mail list logo
