On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 01:49 am, Ted Drake wrote:
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites. Ignoring it
isn't going to help your
-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 9:38 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7
John Faulds wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote
Ted Drake wrote:
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites. Ignoring it isn't
going to help your web development.
Ted
Paranoia? I
On 20 Oct 2006, at 17:26:35, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
Ted Drake wrote:
I don't get the paranoia.
IE7 is much more secure than IE6. If you don't like IE7, you can
simply
uninstall it and ie6 is restored after a reboot.
As a web dev, you need to install IE7 and test your sites.
Ignoring it
I agree, though, that a virtual machine is the way to go for those who
need multiple installs, especially given that Virtual PC for Windows is
now a free download.
Does using Microsoft's Virtual PC make any difference as to the legality
of running the same copy of Windows on different
On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
You are doing this even though IE 7 is supposed
At 06:20 PM 19/10/2006 -0400, Christian Montoya wrote: Rahul Gonsalves wrote: I will not be allowing IE7 to be installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).You are doing this even though IE 7 is supposed to be
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7
On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been
I ran their test and it said that my system didn't appear to be vulnerable (IE7 XP SP 2), I might add that I'm completely patched including one fix from this morning.On 20/10/06,
Samuel Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first security exploit has already come out for IE7. It would be a
John Faulds ink wired:
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us
I'm just wondering whether it's better to
download the fix to stop IE7 installing via
automatic update and continue to use IE7 as
a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6 and then
install a standalone for IE6.
Return Receipt
Your RE: [WSG] IE6 - IE7
document
Looks like that thing has been released
http://neowin.net/index.php?act=viewid=35665
Time to lock one of my VirtualMachines out of software update to keep
IE 6, and have the other one allowed to proceed, me thinks.
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://emps.l-c-n.com
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
how do you go about doing this?
dwain
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been worked
out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
how do you go about doing this?
Do you
John Faulds wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:52:17 +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
I will not be allowing IE7 to be
installed on my main computer, until most of the bugs have been
worked out, and a couple of security updates have been applied :-).
how do you go about
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether
it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via automatic
update and continue to use IE7 as a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6 and
then install a standalone for IE6.
What would be the pros and cons of each
On 10/17/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether
it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via automatic
update and continue to use IE7 as a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6 and
then install a standalone for
Christian Montoya wrote:
On 10/17/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether
it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via automatic
update and continue to use IE7 as a standalone, or let IE7 replace IE6
and
Of Christian Montoya
Sent: Wednesday, 18 October 2006 1:19 PM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: Re: [WSG] IE6 - IE7
On 10/17/06, John Faulds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the public release of IE7 nearly on us I'm just wondering whether
it's better to download the fix to stop IE7 installing via
I believe, that when testing, it is best to simulate the native
conditions under which a browser would be used.
Yeah, good point.
PS: Thanks for your submit button skinning tutorial! Using it right now.
No worries! :)
--
Tyssen Design
Web print design services
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph:
20 matches
Mail list logo
