Yes. But I'm not sure if it's semantically correct.
-Original Message-
Barney Carroll wrote:
But is it accessible?
==
The information contained in this email and any attachment is confidential and
may
Shortest DTD-valid HTML 4.01 Strict document, with the root element being HTML:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//ENTITLE//P
However, you don't need to choose HTML as your root element. This
document is DTD-valid HTML4.01 Strict.
!DOCTYPE P PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
--
Rimantas wrote:
That's not minimal document. This one is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
title./titlep.
Strictly speaking, the p is optional - you only need a title and some
content
The shortest document I could get to validate is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//X//DTD
That's not minimal document. This one is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
title./titlep.
Strictly speaking, the p is optional - you only need a title and some
content
In this case dots are optional, p is not. What you say is true for
Transitional DTD.
The shortest page I
But is it accessible?
Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
That's not minimal document. This one is:
!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN
title./titlep.
Strictly speaking, the p is optional - you only need a title and some
content
In this case dots are optional, p is not. What you say is
On 2/2/07, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But is it accessible?
Oh, man, I almost fell out of my chair laughing. Okay, not really, but
it really is funny.
Dan
***
List Guidelines:
