I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
Article: http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/TJK_tipMenu_demo.asp
Demo: http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/TJK_tipMenu_demo.asp
Also, I'd like to hear opinions about the real value of *text* vs. alt
attributes. I know some say
I know some say images are *as good as* text as long as they
have the proper ALT attribute.
I like text better because I think that putting an image of text into
markup is equivalent to putting your font, text color, background,
etc, into markup. Both make those attributes impossible to change
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 04:39:32PM -0400, Kenny Graham wrote:
markup is equivalent to putting your font, text color, background,
etc, into markup. Both make those attributes impossible to change in
the CSS (which makes alternate/user stylesheets REALY fun).
Are user style sheets normally
David Dorward wrote:
At least with regular images a user can turn them off and get the alt
text (which can be styled in at least some browsers, Firefox being the
test case I just ran though).
But these *are* regular images; and if you turn images off you should get
*real* text.
---
Regards,
Article: http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/TJK_tipMenu_demo.asp
That should actually be:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/using_real_images_in_menus.asp
;)
--
Tyssen Design
Web print design services
www.tyssendesign.com.au
Ph: (07) 3300 3303
Mb: 0405 678 590
John Faulds wrote:
Article: http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/TJK_tipMenu_demo.asp
That should actually be:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/using_real_images_in_menus.asp
Thanks John,
That's because I'm cut-and-paste-challenged. But sometimes it gets worst, I
post things like: