Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-16 Thread tee
On Jul 16, 2006, at 5:55 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: Tee G.Peng wrote: Philip, On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nikita The Spider wrote: Tee, There is no such thing as a <.li> element; I assume you mean . That was for people who read email in HTML mode :) That's not how HTML mail works. Just let

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-16 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Tee G.Peng wrote: Philip, On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nikita The Spider wrote: Tee, There is no such thing as a <.li> element; I assume you mean . That was for people who read email in HTML mode :) That's not how HTML mail works. Just let the mail clients handle encoding the messages pr

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-14 Thread Matt Heerema
Was I not told by Mike from green-beast don't blindly rely on automated validator the other day! :) I believe that was in regard to accessibility? Unless I wasn't reading closely enough. The HTML validator has a few bugs, but I think you are safe in this situation. Unless I am mistake

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-14 Thread Anders Nawroth
Tee G.Peng: Is it legal to place a div in <.li>? You'll find the answers to such questions here: http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/ http://htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/lists/li.html If you learn to read DTD:s the same information is in them. Here: http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/dtds.html#a_

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Nikita The Spider
On 7/13/06, Tee G.Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: OK, perhaps I should rephrase my question. Is there no semantical reason that it's not quite legal to do so? You must forgive me asking this seemingly stupid question; the heated Alphabetical Listing Buttons thread did make me think twice how to u

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Tee G.Peng
On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Al Sparber wrote: We're legal, Tee :-) Ah, sorry, I should have trust in you :) tee ** The discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ See http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm for some h

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Tee G.Peng
Philip, On Jul 13, 2006, at 6:37 PM, Nikita The Spider wrote: Tee, There is no such thing as a <.li> element; I assume you mean . That was for people who read email in HTML mode :) If that's the case, then yes, it is OK to put a inside . Besides, if the W3C validator said it was OK, isn't

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Nikita The Spider
On 7/13/06, Tee G.Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, Is it legal to place a div in <.li>? Something like this <.li>x it does validate Tee, There is no such thing as a <.li> element; I assume you mean . If that's the case, then yes, it is OK to put a inside . Besides, if the W3C valida

Re: [WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Al Sparber
From: "Tee G.Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is it legal to place a div in <.li>? Something like this <.li>x it does validate I am using XHTML 1.0 strict doctype and it doesn't show validate error, also, the WAI validation from content quality site doesn't give me warning or error, but I fe

[WSG] div in

2006-07-13 Thread Tee G.Peng
Hi, Is it legal to place a div in <.li>? Something like this <.li>x it does validate I am using XHTML 1.0 strict doctype and it doesn't show validate error, also, the WAI validation from content quality site doesn't give me warning or error, but I feel so uncertain about it. If you