MAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:51 AM
To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
Subject: RE: [WSG] Accessibility Trustmark
This looks little better to me than an advertising piece for another (poor
quality?) commercial service. I have no experience of this company, but
SiteMorse are probably
Tim wrote:
Why not just use the W3C icons or the Cynthia icon tested at the page
bottom?
I'm not paying someone who knows less than me to rate my site.
Even the RNIB See it Right logo costs money. Why get sucked into a lot
of commercial greed?
The W3C or Cynthia badges only attest that a pa
Emma Sax wrote:
Agreed. If a large company like O2 hadn't decided to buy into it, it
would have been easier to fob off.
Didn't Segala CEO Paul Walsh actually work for O2 at some point, before
setting up on his own? At the very least, he had some prior connection
with them, but my memory fai
> Bugger off Segala. These trustmarks really annoy me,
> Just more commerical organisations seeking to make money.
Agreed. If a large company like O2 hadn't decided to buy into it, it
would have been easier to fob off. I know I could do a better job in
testing but little old me doesn't have as m
Bugger off Segala. These trustmarks really annoy me,
Just more commerical organisations seeking to make money.
Why not just use the W3C icons or the Cynthia icon tested at the page
bottom?
I'm not paying someone who knows less than me to rate my site.
Even the RNIB See it Right logo costs mon
This looks little better to me than an advertising piece
for another (poor quality?) commercial service. I have no experience of this
company, but SiteMorse are probably the leaders in this field, and have courted
plenty of controversy along the way.
Any testing is better than no testing, bu
