RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

>I agree entirely with Rachel, web standards are (or should be) independent >of server-side technology. It's the HTML/CSS that gets outputted to the >browser that matters, regardless of what creates that output. I agree too. It's a puzzling attitude. I've seen people speak about web standards be

RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

45 To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards Hi Robin, The first thing I notice is the different doctype between pages - the last one you mentioned (.net) has a HTML4 strict, and the other one you developed has XHTML transitional. I expect that this is a big p

RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

rom: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rachel May Sent: Tuesday, 20 February 2007 1:45 p.m. To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards Hi Robin, The first thing I notice is the different doctype between pages - the last one y

RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

Hi Robin, The first thing I notice is the different doctype between pages - the last one you mentioned (.net) has a HTML4 strict, and the other one you developed has XHTML transitional. I expect that this is a big part of the difference. Also, because of the different doctype, the page doesn't val

Re: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

Hi Robin, A quick comparison of the differences should help. most decent text editors will do a diff for you. The first I saw is that you're looking at XHTML in your demo, and HTML 4 in your CMS one. If you can get rid of the comment before the doctype do so; as people have already said, it pu

RE: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

: Tuesday, 20 February 2007 1:28 p.m. To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards Robin @ Xplore.net wrote: > I have taken one of their recent site builds > http://www.needanerd.co.nz <http://www.needanerd.co.nz/> and quickly > rebuilt it in L

Re: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

That above the doctype is probably the main source of the problem as it puts IE into quirks mode. On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:06:40 +1000, Robin @ Xplore.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Group, Our web development company is a LAMP based company and we are affiliated with another web deve

Re: [WSG] trying to justify webstandards

Robin @ Xplore.net wrote: I have taken one of their recent site builds http://www.needanerd.co.nz and quickly rebuilt it in Lamp environment (http://training.xtools.co.nz/need_a_nerd/index.htm ) to show how the code can be leaner reducing band width more accessib