Kevin McMonagle wrote:
yes lads,
this is my first post in a while,
Im looking for a website that had a good 3 col css tutorial on it to refer a
colleague to.
I cant remeber the name of the designer or its url. Its a very nice site with green vines or ivy hanging
down from the top and there ar
www.joshuaink.comHope you're not easily offended... ;)
***List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfmUnsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfmHelp: [EMAIL PROTECTED]**
> I cant remeber the name of the designer or its url. Its a very nice site with
> green vines or ivy hanging
> down from the top and there are hummingbirds on it.
> Does that ring a bell to anyone?
> -best
> kevin
>
http://joshuaink.com/
**
Kevin McMonagle wrote:
yes lads,
this is my first post in a while,
Im looking for a website that had a good 3 col css tutorial on it to refer a
colleague to.
I cant remeber the name of the designer or its url. Its a very nice site with green vines or ivy hanging
down from the top and there are
it joshuaink.com that i was looking for.
BTW I thought that his current emotional blog post about web2.0 and a
profitable business model would strike a chord with a project manager i know.
Also a question raised by his post - Are dl's deprecated? they work well for
displaying business li
pt to define, but I'm fairly sure its not their contact details!
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin McMonagle
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:58 PM
> To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org
> Su
As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect.
Maybe if you look at it very strictly, but they are OK with the spirit
with at least HTML4.01.
Specification provides example: "Another application of DL, for
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:13:00PM +0300, Rimantas Liubertas wrote:
> >As far as I can see, DL's are not deprecated, but they probably should
> >be, as the vast majority of use cases are semantically incorrect.
>
> Specification provides example: "Another application of DL, for
> example, is for m
