[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

augusto2112 created this revision. augusto2112 added a reviewer: aprantl. Herald added a subscriber: inglorion. Herald added a project: All. augusto2112 requested review of this revision. Herald added a project: LLDB. Herald added a subscriber: lldb-commits. Make the lldb test target depend on LTO

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

DavidSpickett added a comment. If you don't have LTO, does this mean that only that one test won't run, or will the whole suite not run? Perhaps I misunderstand the purpose of add_lldb_test_dependency. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

augusto2112 added a comment. @DavidSpickett right now if you don't have LTO the test will run but fail. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051 ___ lldb

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

DavidSpickett added a comment. Sorry I should have been specific. With this change applied, when you don't have LTO, we'll just skip the individual test, or we'll not do testing at all? Wondering if this is an all or nothing situation, which would be unfortunate for a single test. Repository:

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

aprantl added a comment. @DavidSpickett Is it possible to configure LLVM to not build with libLTO? Which CMake flag controls this? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

DavidSpickett added a comment. Well that was my confusion, no there isn't an option. So how does one end up with a build that doesn't include it. Perhaps a standalone build of lldb, built with a prebuilt llvm that didn't package libLTO? Which sounds perfectly legitimate and the test should be s

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

aprantl added a comment. > Well that was my confusion, no there isn't an option. So how does one end up > with a build that doesn't include it. Perhaps a standalone build of lldb, > built with a prebuilt llvm that didn't package libLTO? This is just about adding a dependency between lldb-test-d

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

DavidSpickett accepted this revision. DavidSpickett added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. > If you just run ninja check-lldb prior to this patch libLTO would not be > built. Great, put that in the commit message. What I was trying to get at was the meaning of depends

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

augusto2112 added a comment. @DavidSpickett thanks for the review, I've updated the commit message to be clearer. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051 _

[Lldb-commits] [PATCH] D140051: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rGf85cc6009aa7: [lldb] Add LTO dependency to lldb test suite (authored by augusto2112). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D140051/new/ https://revi