[lldb-dev] [Bug 42514] lldb fails to configure when signing adhoc

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42514 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org |dav...@freebsd.org -- You are rece

[lldb-dev] [Bug 42514] New: lldb fails to configure when signing adhoc

https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42514 Bug ID: 42514 Summary: lldb fails to configure when signing adhoc Product: lldb Version: unspecified Hardware: PC OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

I just went forward with this and made a quick test repo with an out-of-tree lldb-mi that compiles against the system LLDB: https://github.com/Teemperor/lldb-mi This seems to work fine with the exception of the python tests which require LLDB’s python code

[lldb-dev] Evaluating the same expression at the same breakpoint gets slower after a certain number of steps

I have two breakpoint inside methods that are called every frame (C++ project using Unreal), and every time one of them is reached, I evaluate one expression (I'm being able to reproduce this using an undefined name, say "undefinedVariable"). After a few iterations (usually tens), the time it takes

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:58 AM Zdenek Prikryl via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > We're using it with Eclipse and Eclipse based product, so I'd like to keep > as well! :-)... > > Zdenek > I do understand that there's desire from people to keep this around (from an user perspective),

Re: [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi

We're using it with Eclipse and Eclipse based product, so I'd like to keep as well! :-)... Zdenek On 7/2/19 12:21 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev wrote: We’re using lldb-mi to debug with Eclipse in the Hexagon SDK. I’d really like to keep it! 😊 Ted *From:* lldb-dev *On Behalf Of *Jonas De