https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157958
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157977
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157588
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
> Somewhat off-topic for this PR, but why can't `REQUIRES: shell` force use of
> shell even if internal shell is the default? Then we don't lose test coverage
> and don't block this on migration of the long-tail of tests.
Previously, we've discussed giving lit a hybrid mode tha
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157232
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Should we update the lit implementation handling for `not`/`env` to avoid
reordering those two commands when combined?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157236
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.
ilovepi wrote:
I don't know if I understand what you're going for in this patch. How is this
an improvement over just keeping `REQUIRES: shell`? The `REQUIRES: ` bit is
what's going to stop the test from running in the wrong environment. That seems
like the right tradeoff.
https://github.c
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157237
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157234
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
Closing, since I think we're definitely moving away from this approach, and
will be pursuing some of the ideas discussed w/ @efriedma-quic and others to
address the core issues rather than paper over them.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135706
___
https://github.com/ilovepi closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135706
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -126,6 +138,15 @@ static Object serializeComment(const CommentInfo &I,
Object &Description) {
auto TextCommentsArray = extractTextComments(CARef.front().getAsObject());
if (I.Name == "brief")
insertComment(Description, TextCommentsArray, "BriefComments");
+
@@ -126,6 +138,15 @@ static Object serializeComment(const CommentInfo &I,
Object &Description) {
auto TextCommentsArray = extractTextComments(CARef.front().getAsObject());
if (I.Name == "brief")
insertComment(Description, TextCommentsArray, "BriefComments");
+
ilovepi wrote:
> It'd be nice to have a test for this but I'm not sure how to check for the
> existence of something after a LIT test is done.
Why not just another `RUN` line?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150656
___
llvm-branch-commits m
@@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ getClangDocContext(std::vector UserStylesheets =
{},
StringRef RepositoryUrl = "",
StringRef RepositoryLinePrefix = "", StringRef Base = "") {
ClangDocContext CDCtx{
- {}, "test-project", {}, {}, {}, RepositoryUr
@@ -481,9 +481,9 @@ ClangDocContext::ClangDocContext(tooling::ExecutionContext
*ECtx,
StringRef RepositoryUrl,
StringRef RepositoryLinePrefix, StringRef
Base,
std::vector UserSt
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150648
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150571
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -1,40 +1,43 @@
;; Test if temporary labels are generated for each indirect callsite with a
callee_type metadata.
-;; Test if the .callgraph section contains the numerical callee type id for
each of the temporary
-;; labels generated.
+;; Test if the .callgraph section cont
@@ -2869,9 +2870,23 @@ static void setLinkageForGV(llvm::GlobalValue *GV, const
NamedDecl *ND) {
GV->setLinkage(llvm::GlobalValue::ExternalWeakLinkage);
}
+static bool hasExistingGeneralizedTypeMD(llvm::Function *F) {
+ llvm::MDNode *MD = F->getMetadata(llvm::LLVMContext
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150470
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. Consider squashing this with the precommit tests, though. It's pretty
clear how the output changed, and all the tests just end up dropping `-NOT`,
which isn't great. plus I'd expect those tests to fail when something like a
tag match
ilovepi wrote:
Since you're just dropping the NOT prefix in the next patch, I'd consider just
squashing them together. Left a similar comment up the stack.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150469
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-bran
ilovepi wrote:
Not totally convinced these are great precommit tests. TOday we don't emit
these, but I think some of the tags will probably end up matching on later
lines (at least I'd expect them to). Would be fine dropping this and just
taking the patch after, since its clear how the functio
@@ -259,7 +259,24 @@ HTML-CALC:
HTML-CALC:
HTML-CALC:
HTML-CALC:
-HTML-CALC:
+HTML-CALC-NOT:
ilovepi wrote:
Won't this check bre
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150468
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150468
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150467
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
ilovepi wrote:
I think this is mostly in good shape, but some of the tests could be reduced
slightly using the method I gave in an another one of your PRs. After that its
probably LGTM from my perspective.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87575
___
@@ -210,12 +229,17 @@ serializeCommonAttributes(const Info &I, json::Object
&Obj,
}
if (!I.Description.empty()) {
-json::Value DescArray = json::Array();
-auto &DescArrayRef = *DescArray.getAsArray();
-DescArrayRef.reserve(I.Description.size());
-for (cons
@@ -60,6 +60,17 @@ HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE: class Shape
+HTML-SHAPE:
+HTML-SHAPE:
+HTML-SHAPE: Abstr
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM, except the Q on formatting. Obviously doesn't need to be solved in this
patch, though.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149565
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commi
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149565
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -60,6 +60,17 @@ HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE:
HTML-SHAPE: class Shape
+HTML-SHAPE:
+HTML-SHAPE:
+HTML-SHAPE: Abstr
@@ -210,12 +229,17 @@ serializeCommonAttributes(const Info &I, json::Object
&Obj,
}
if (!I.Description.empty()) {
-json::Value DescArray = json::Array();
-auto &DescArrayRef = *DescArray.getAsArray();
-DescArrayRef.reserve(I.Description.size());
-for (cons
https://github.com/ilovepi commented:
This seems mostly fine. I'll probably LGTM once I go through the whole stack.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149564
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149564
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM, modulo formatting and 1 small suggestion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146165
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146165
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -947,6 +952,53 @@ emitInfo(const NamespaceDecl *D, const FullComment *FC,
Location Loc,
return {std::move(NSI), makeAndInsertIntoParent(*NSI)};
}
+static void parseFriends(RecordInfo &RI, const CXXRecordDecl *D) {
+ if (D->hasDefinition() && D->hasFriends())
---
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146164
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -25,7 +24,7 @@ typedef int MyTypedef;
// CHECK-NEXT: {
// CHECK-NEXT:"Location": {
// CHECK-NEXT: "Filename": "{{.*}}namespace.cpp",
-// CHECK-NEXT: "LineNumber": 15
+// CHECK-NEXT: "LineNumber": 14
ilovepi wrote:
Sho
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM, w/ one Q about the test expr. I could go either way on that, so its up to
you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145069
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -211,6 +214,15 @@ struct TemplateSpecializationInfo {
std::vector Params;
};
+struct ConstraintInfo {
+ ConstraintInfo() = default;
+ ConstraintInfo(SymbolID USR, StringRef Name)
+ : ConceptRef(USR, Name, InfoType::IT_concept) {}
+ Reference ConceptRef;
+
+ Small
@@ -649,6 +693,9 @@ template <> void addTemplate(RecordInfo *I, TemplateInfo
&&P) {
template <> void addTemplate(FunctionInfo *I, TemplateInfo &&P) {
I->Template.emplace(std::move(P));
}
+template <> void addTemplate(ConceptInfo *I, TemplateInfo &&P) {
+ I->Template = std::
@@ -584,6 +613,18 @@ template <> llvm::Error addReference(RecordInfo *I,
Reference &&R, FieldId F) {
}
}
+template <>
+llvm::Error addReference(ConstraintInfo *I, Reference &&R, FieldId F) {
+ switch (F) {
+ case FieldId::F_concept:
+I->ConceptRef = std::move(R);
+
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144430
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -817,6 +872,20 @@ llvm::Error ClangDocBitcodeReader::readSubBlock(unsigned
ID, T I) {
addChild(I, std::move(TI));
return llvm::Error::success();
}
+ case BI_CONSTRAINT_BLOCK_ID: {
+ConstraintInfo CI;
+if (auto Err = readBlock(ID, &CI))
+ return Err;
@@ -248,6 +257,27 @@ static void serializeCommonChildren(const ScopeChildren
&Children,
}
}
+template
+static void serializeArray(const std::vector &Records, Object &Obj,
+ const std::string &Key,
+ SerializationFunc seri
@@ -662,6 +709,14 @@ void addTemplateSpecialization(TemplateInfo *I,
I->Specialization.emplace(std::move(TSI));
}
+template static void addConstraint(T I, ConstraintInfo &&C) {
+ llvm::errs() << "invalid container for constraint info";
+ exit(1);
+}
ilove
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. overall really good improvement. most of my comments are me noticing bad
existing code we should fix.
I also left a few nit comments to address, but they're rather minor.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144430
_
ilovepi wrote:
> Linux CI shows failing but looks like all tests passed despite that.
>
> Added compound constraint support which just goes through the nested
> expressions until it reaches the constraint.
I've just been clicking re-run on those when i see it. you may want to file
abug abou
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143209
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --output=%t --format=json --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/index.json
+
+class MyClass {};
+
+void myFunction(int Param);
+
+namespace NestedNamespace {
+} // namespace Nested
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --output=%t --format=json --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/index.json
+
+static void myFunction() {}
+
+void noExceptFunction() noexcept {}
+
+inline void inlineFunction() {}
+
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. This seems like its in order, assuming CI is happy.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143209
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
@@ -171,5 +171,78 @@ TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitRecordJSON) {
})raw";
EXPECT_EQ(Expected, Actual.str());
}
+
+TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitNamespaceJSON) {
+ NamespaceInfo I;
+ I.Name = "Namespace";
+ I.Path = "path/to/A";
+ I.Namespace.emplace_back(EmptySID, "A", InfoTyp
@@ -171,5 +171,78 @@ TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitRecordJSON) {
})raw";
EXPECT_EQ(Expected, Actual.str());
}
+
+TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitNamespaceJSON) {
+ NamespaceInfo I;
+ I.Name = "Namespace";
+ I.Path = "path/to/A";
+ I.Namespace.emplace_back(EmptySID, "A", InfoTyp
@@ -171,5 +171,78 @@ TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitRecordJSON) {
})raw";
EXPECT_EQ(Expected, Actual.str());
}
+
+TEST(JSONGeneratorTest, emitNamespaceJSON) {
+ NamespaceInfo I;
+ I.Name = "Namespace";
+ I.Path = "path/to/A";
+ I.Namespace.emplace_back(EmptySID, "A", InfoTyp
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --output=%t --format=json --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/index.json
+
+class MyClass {};
+
+void myFunction(int Param);
+
+namespace NestedNamespace {
+} // namespace Nested
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// RUN: rm -rf %t && mkdir -p %t
+// RUN: clang-doc --output=%t --format=json --executor=standalone %s
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t/GlobalNamespace/index.json
+
+static void myFunction() {}
+
+void noExceptFunction() noexcept {}
+
+inline void inlineFunction() {}
+
https://github.com/ilovepi edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143209
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
LGTM. I left some comments inline, but I'm fine if we plan to address them
later.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143209
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.ll
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13
>From 7373f7c53b287c9fcc2339bfe055d0eb60b974f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:47:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][EmbedBitcodePass] Prevent modifying the module with
ThinLTO
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13
>From 5205f4abb2379b11b2a2be075c262dea8d79c889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:47:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][EmbedBitcodePass] Prevent modifying the module with
ThinLTO
ilovepi wrote:
### Merge activity
* **May 29, 5:24 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this pull
request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/13).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13
>From 5205f4abb2379b11b2a2be075c262dea8d79c889 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:47:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [llvm][EmbedBitcodePass] Prevent modifying the module with
ThinLTO
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From dc1b8f6c518e964c59bdcc170d5daca06c3a0fd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From bfd1d03da32ddda7bfab7c5122bc8a55e88b1353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From dc1b8f6c518e964c59bdcc170d5daca06c3a0fd4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From f8eff8a3edac66574902c693aacce42d6ac7b295 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From f8eff8a3edac66574902c693aacce42d6ac7b295 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From b6c17fee39c013db4fa8b32650ed7afa14f0bd91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From bfd1d03da32ddda7bfab7c5122bc8a55e88b1353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From b6c17fee39c013db4fa8b32650ed7afa14f0bd91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From 73cdd50ae91dbb751d2d3d56c388bcca6227b137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From 3d478e150a4bb22b1561852dcddbaed1e24b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
ilovepi wrote:
### Merge activity
* **May 23, 10:52 PM UTC**: A user started a stack merge that includes this
pull request via
[Graphite](https://app.graphite.dev/github/pr/llvm/llvm-project/138064).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138064
___
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138064
>From 011f2973a836c21b3ccc869fa96d64385c5b5b75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:13:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Implement setupTemplateValue for
HTMLMustacheGenerator
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From fae895bbea79cc8a7adbf7266f366ecbc205ed91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138065
>From 7deaf5aea3a20dc34f7eab13244e161da74a3148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:31:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update serializer for improved template handling
This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138065
>From 7deaf5aea3a20dc34f7eab13244e161da74a3148 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:31:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update serializer for improved template handling
This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From 5dd55e81bd0d4f18b880c450e21e9faefcd38327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138064
>From 011f2973a836c21b3ccc869fa96d64385c5b5b75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:13:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Implement setupTemplateValue for
HTMLMustacheGenerator
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From 5dd55e81bd0d4f18b880c450e21e9faefcd38327 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From fae895bbea79cc8a7adbf7266f366ecbc205ed91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138064
>From 5e56a521547f6e5b309fcfd65f5ad459a03f9abc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:13:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Implement setupTemplateValue for
HTMLMustacheGenerator
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138065
>From 2d48537e7a270c0a1c6f463ef1118a65c40a6f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:31:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update serializer for improved template handling
This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138063
>From 6880c2fcb571c53ad4e21804b805e82a93077bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:11:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Extract Info into JSON values
Split from #133161. This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From e94b231dbca9073da99f616516e21350d1136168 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138063
>From 6880c2fcb571c53ad4e21804b805e82a93077bc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:11:39 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Extract Info into JSON values
Split from #133161. This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138065
>From 2d48537e7a270c0a1c6f463ef1118a65c40a6f27 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:31:54 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update serializer for improved template handling
This
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From 46795349a75a0815041e7ac3038be9c00ce8ad2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138064
>From 5e56a521547f6e5b309fcfd65f5ad459a03f9abc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:13:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Implement setupTemplateValue for
HTMLMustacheGenerator
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138066
>From e94b231dbca9073da99f616516e21350d1136168 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 18:08:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Update clang-doc tool to enable mustache
templates
Th
https://github.com/ilovepi updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/138067
>From 46795349a75a0815041e7ac3038be9c00ce8ad2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Kirth
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 14:20:40 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-doc] Track if a type is a template or builtin
Originally pa
1 - 100 of 808 matches
Mail list logo
