https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94248
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
It looks like precommit CI found relevant failures:
```
_bk;t=1717501095887FAILED:
tools/clang/unittests/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchersDocTests.cpp
_bk;t=1717501095887cmd.exe /C "cd /D
C:\ws\src\build\tools\clang\unittests\ASTMatchers &&
C:\ws\src\clang
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94248
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I wonder if we should add some documentation to ASTMatchers.h about the new
special syntax for comments so that users who hit test failures with the new
automatic tests have some more help getting to a solution.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pu
@@ -330,35 +377,46 @@ AST_POLYMORPHIC_MATCHER_P(isExpandedFromMacro,
/// Matches declarations.
///
-/// Examples matches \c X, \c C, and the friend declaration inside \c C;
+/// Given
/// \code
/// void X();
/// class C {
-/// friend X;
+/// friend void X();
//
@@ -176,11 +176,13 @@ inline internal::TrueMatcher anything() { return
internal::TrueMatcher(); }
/// \code
/// int X;
/// namespace NS {
-/// int Y;
+/// int Y;
/// } // namespace NS
/// \endcode
-/// decl(hasDeclContext(translationUnitDecl()))
-/// matches "
@@ -330,35 +377,46 @@ AST_POLYMORPHIC_MATCHER_P(isExpandedFromMacro,
/// Matches declarations.
///
-/// Examples matches \c X, \c C, and the friend declaration inside \c C;
+/// Given
/// \code
/// void X();
/// class C {
-/// friend X;
+/// friend void X();
//
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
The changes generally LGTM, though I would appreciate a second set of eyes on
the CMake and Python changes because I have a bit less confidence in my review
abilities there.
Thank you for adding the documentation to the header file, I think that will
AaronBallman wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> > ... how this impacts build times for Clang itself? I'm assuming that if
> > ASTMatchers.h isn't modified, CMake won't re-run
> > generate_ast_matcher_doc_tests.py and so the compile time performance hit
> > is only on full rebuilds or when changing the head
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94244
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
AaronBallman wrote:
> > Do you need me to land the changes on your behalf?
>
> No need, I can do that. However, this PR is in a stack and depends on two
> small PRs: #94244 and #94243 that need to be reviewed before this PR can be
> merged
Ah thank you for pointing this out, I hadn't realized
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM, I think the CI failures are unrelated to this patch.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100191
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I don't see a need to backport this for 19.x, it seems reasonable to let it
bake for a while in 20.x (though I would be surprised if there was significant
negative fallout from the changes).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100703
___
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101005
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -495,10 +495,12 @@ New Compiler Flags
Deprecated Compiler Flags
-
-- The ``-Ofast`` command-line option has been deprecated. This option both
- enables the ``-O3`` optimization-level, as well as enabling non-standard
- ``-ffast-math`` behaviors. As
@@ -429,8 +429,11 @@ Code Generation Options
:option:`-Ofast` Enables all the optimizations from :option:`-O3` along
with other aggressive optimizations that may violate strict compliance with
-language standards. This is deprecated in favor of :option:`-O3`
-i
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Thank you for working on this!
I think we need these changes to be against `main` and not `19.x`, aside from
the release notes (otherwise we're losing the documentation in 20.x). For the
release notes, I think we can talk to @tstellar and @tru about g
AaronBallman wrote:
Just what was hopefully already merged:
- Clang now diagnoses undefined behavior in constant expressions more
consistently. This includes invalid shifts, and signed overflow in arithmetic.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100452
AaronBallman wrote:
Ah thank you for the explanation -- what was tripping me up was the changes in
`clang/test/Sema/aarch64-sme-func-attrs.c` where we used to issue diagnostics.
Okay, this makes more sense as to why we'd want to backport it then, so I
retract my objection.
https://github.com/
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
The changes LGTM -- the precommit CI failures seem to be unrelated, but it
would be good to get a second opinion.
After the pick lands, please be sure to add a release note so users know about
the fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-pr
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
The ABI precommit CI test failures look to be unrelated to these changes, but
at the same time, this could potentially impact ABI (any time we change the
behavior of a type trait, it can potentially impact ABI). So it may be goo
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM! There's no chance these changes are what is breaking the ABI precommit CI
tests. ;-)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101663
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-co
AaronBallman wrote:
Thanks for reminding me of that @Endilll -- LGTM still.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101491
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-br
AaronBallman wrote:
The current release note reads as:
```
- The ``-Ofast`` command-line option has been deprecated. This option both
enables the ``-O3`` optimization-level, as well as enabling non-standard
``-ffast-math`` behaviors. As such, it is somewhat misleading as an
"optimization le
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM for a backport
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101963
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101967
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you for the quick workaround!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102039
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bi
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102428
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
AaronBallman wrote:
> The patch here is pretty big in size, but it seems to only affects the
> remarks, on the other hand it doesn't seem to really fix anything and in that
> case I feel like RC3 might be the wrong time to merge this. Is there a huge
> upside to take this this late in the proc
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102968
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commi
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102514
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM, but please add a release note when this lands.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104027
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80845
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80962
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
AaronBallman wrote:
Is this fixing a regression introduced in Clang 18? I'm wondering why the
backport is needed in the first place, as this seems to be making potentially
significant changes during the RC ("Make +pauth enabled in Armv8.3-a by
default").
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/p
AaronBallman wrote:
> I'm OK with this kind of change if the AArch64 maintainers are on board.
> @AaronBallman Do you have a strong objection to this PR?
We don't typically backport *features* unless there's some strongly compelling
case. This sounds like a nice-to-have but I'm not certain why
AaronBallman wrote:
> > I'm OK with this kind of change if the AArch64 maintainers are on board.
> > @AaronBallman Do you have a strong objection to this PR?
>
> We don't typically backport _features_ unless there's some strongly
> compelling case. This sounds like a nice-to-have but I'm not c
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82739
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82739
>From d3ae59831c804f18b3a415c71a7b392d07c40f94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Vetinari"
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 19:03:59 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] fix links on clang 18.1.0rc release page
---
clang/docs/Re
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82739
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86106
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
The changes seem reasonable to me, but I've added the CMake code owners for
final approval.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86078
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86080
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===- CIRTypes.td - CIR dialect types -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+//===-- CIROps.td - CIR dialect definition -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
Generally LGTM as well, but added the CMake code owners for their opinions on
those bits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86080
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.or
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86072
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+//===- CIRTypes.td - CIR dialect types -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+//===-- CIROps.td - CIR dialect definition -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86106
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> Hi @antoniofrighetto (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about
> this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this
> comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix.
How about we go with something along the lines of:
Fixed
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM for backporting
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87696
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llv
https://github.com/AaronBallman requested changes to this pull request.
I don't think we should add this to the 18.x release -- we're already getting
requests from users to not do that:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20240408/566402.html
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-p
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88453
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
I think the 18.1 behavior is already correct?
https://godbolt.org/z/v3G7h44E1
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88453
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
AaronBallman wrote:
Ah that's right, it was with definitions that we ran into the issue! Sorry for
being slow today. Okay, I retract my concerns, this is a safe and targeted fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88453
___
llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
I think this is reasonable, but leaving it to @erichkeane to make the final
call.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88453
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
AaronBallman wrote:
> What are the current rules on cherry picks for old bugs? AFAICT this patch
> wasn't fixing a bug introduced in the 17.x-18.x development region.
https://releases.llvm.org/17.0.1/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html#release-patch-rules
has the documented rules.
https://github.com/l
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
Sorry about leaving it in a "requests changes" state, LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88453
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//===- CIRDialect.td - CIR dialect -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM, though it would be nice if @petrhosek or @Ericson2314 could validate the
cmake changes (they look sensible to me, but I never know if there's a better
way to do things in CMake).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86080
_
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+//===- CIRDialect.td - CIR dialect -*- tablegen
-*-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apa
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86080
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> > LGTM, though it would be nice if @petrhosek or @Ericson2314 could validate
> > the cmake changes (they look sensible to me, but I never know if there's a
> > better way to do things in CMake).
>
> We already did that above. Petr left a comment and it was fixed :p
Ah, I
@@ -3464,6 +3464,34 @@ Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_trap)``.
``__builtin_arm_trap`` is lowered to the ``llvm.aarch64.break`` builtin, and
then to ``brk #payload``.
+``__builtin_allow_runtime_check``
AaronBallman wrote:
The docs are
@@ -3233,6 +3233,17 @@ Sema::CheckBuiltinFunctionCall(FunctionDecl *FDecl,
unsigned BuiltinID,
if (BuiltinCountZeroBitsGeneric(*this, TheCall))
return ExprError();
break;
+
+ case Builtin::BI__builtin_allow_runtime_check: {
+Expr *Arg = TheCall->getArg(0);
+
@@ -3464,6 +3464,34 @@ Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_trap)``.
``__builtin_arm_trap`` is lowered to the ``llvm.aarch64.break`` builtin, and
then to ``brk #payload``.
+``__builtin_allow_runtime_check``
AaronBallman wrote:
> It needs t
@@ -3464,6 +3464,54 @@ Query for this feature with
``__has_builtin(__builtin_trap)``.
``__builtin_arm_trap`` is lowered to the ``llvm.aarch64.break`` builtin, and
then to ``brk #payload``.
+``__builtin_allow_runtime_check``
+-
+
+``__builtin_
https://github.com/AaronBallman commented:
With this patch, I get errors when loading a visual studio solution generated
with these change, and all of clang's libraries are placed at the top level.
The error is a dialog box saying "The solution already contains an item named
'clang'."
Another
AaronBallman wrote:
> @AaronBallman Thanks for having a look.
>
> > With this patch, I get errors when loading a visual studio solution
> > generated with these change, and all of clang's libraries are placed at the
> > top level. The error is a dialog box saying "The solution already contains
AaronBallman wrote:
> @AaronBallman Would you mind reviewing D89741 ? I was convinced a stakeholder
> there but they decided to drop out instead of approving it.
Oh the fun of PR numbers now lining up with Phabricator numbers. I thought you
meant https://reviews.llvm.org/D89741 and was very co
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
I verified the layout seems reasonable in Visual Studio 2022; LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89743
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
http
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89467
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89467
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80109
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM for 18.x, but another set of eyes verifying the fix looks safe would not
be a bad thing, either.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/80109
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM! Do we have a release note we need to remove as well?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106516
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://list
AaronBallman wrote:
I'd really appreciate a review from @rjmccall -- the changes are extensive and
risky enough that I worry about landing them this late in the cycle, but this
does fix a miscompile and that's a pretty important thing for us to land. I
didn't spot any concerns with the changes
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
I think you may have intended to tag someone other than Shafik and I for this
one, but the changes LGTM nonetheless.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106892
___
llvm-branch-commits m
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102070
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107212
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commit
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM -- I think this is important for 19.x given the behavior it's correcting.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107886
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.l
AaronBallman wrote:
> This change has already been reverted on main because it breaks clang
> bootstrap and causes assertion failures. This was already known at the time
> it was accepted as "low risk" here. Please exercise at least a minimum amount
> of due diligence before approving backport
Author: Tom Ritter
Date: 2021-01-25T08:06:54-05:00
New Revision: d6d36baa33e76ace11ac20c03de1097d48bd9246
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6d36baa33e76ace11ac20c03de1097d48bd9246
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d6d36baa33e76ace11ac20c03de1097d48bd9246.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2021-01-12T13:16:49-05:00
New Revision: 348471575d9c24bbfb124ca5eac1589de075da88
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/348471575d9c24bbfb124ca5eac1589de075da88
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/348471575d9c24bbfb124ca5eac1589de075da88.diff
LO
Author: Timm Bäder
Date: 2021-01-12T13:20:08-05:00
New Revision: ef3800e82169c674219501d9ac09ef12b28e6359
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ef3800e82169c674219501d9ac09ef12b28e6359
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ef3800e82169c674219501d9ac09ef12b28e6359.diff
LO
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2020-12-15T14:56:44-05:00
New Revision: ef40d5233b8b6f82927128c5b255cdc3aed9021d
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ef40d5233b8b6f82927128c5b255cdc3aed9021d
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ef40d5233b8b6f82927128c5b255cdc3aed9021d.diff
Author: Emma Blink
Date: 2020-12-16T14:42:07-05:00
New Revision: 7685d818ef329cd3f6ef121af1208be409eb59db
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7685d818ef329cd3f6ef121af1208be409eb59db
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/7685d818ef329cd3f6ef121af1208be409eb59db.diff
LO
Author: Tomas Matheson
Date: 2020-12-17T11:43:47-05:00
New Revision: f50066292477fb26806336e5604615d0eddde399
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f50066292477fb26806336e5604615d0eddde399
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/f50066292477fb26806336e5604615d0eddde399.diff
Author: Frank Derry Wanye
Date: 2020-12-18T07:52:20-05:00
New Revision: e69e551e0e5fddffb6479da6a2998457104ba9e6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e69e551e0e5fddffb6479da6a2998457104ba9e6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e69e551e0e5fddffb6479da6a2998457104ba9e6.d
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2020-12-18T07:56:17-05:00
New Revision: 2d2498ec6c42b12eae873257e6ddcefe8348
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d2498ec6c42b12eae873257e6ddcefe8348
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2d2498ec6c42b12eae873257e6ddcefe8348.diff
Author: Yafei Liu
Date: 2020-12-21T08:24:09-05:00
New Revision: b2ba6867eac10874bd279c739639bdb9e60c1996
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2ba6867eac10874bd279c739639bdb9e60c1996
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b2ba6867eac10874bd279c739639bdb9e60c1996.diff
LOG
Author: Jann Horn
Date: 2020-11-23T08:10:35-05:00
New Revision: 00dad9d028ce31739b992a3ce2df5de054a9fa3c
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00dad9d028ce31739b992a3ce2df5de054a9fa3c
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00dad9d028ce31739b992a3ce2df5de054a9fa3c.diff
LOG
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2020-11-25T07:34:08-05:00
New Revision: ed242da0ffa28493d8a5ee6b80ecbe2441ca48a7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed242da0ffa28493d8a5ee6b80ecbe2441ca48a7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/ed242da0ffa28493d8a5ee6b80ecbe2441ca48a7.diff
Author: Nigel Perks
Date: 2020-12-08T12:33:59-05:00
New Revision: 27ea7d0a6e0dc51e0214707bcc265fa6f9dc9bc6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27ea7d0a6e0dc51e0214707bcc265fa6f9dc9bc6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/27ea7d0a6e0dc51e0214707bcc265fa6f9dc9bc6.diff
L
Author: Eric Seidel
Date: 2020-12-08T13:10:41-05:00
New Revision: c6348e8c95ee1eaa9dd2322b278def7a4127ff26
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c6348e8c95ee1eaa9dd2322b278def7a4127ff26
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/c6348e8c95ee1eaa9dd2322b278def7a4127ff26.diff
L
AaronBallman wrote:
> @AaronBallman ok to backport?
Yeah, seems reasonable to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111660
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112697
___
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-comm
AaronBallman wrote:
> This has conflicts now. Can someone fix it and I can merge it for 19.1.4
I took a shot at resolving the conflicts (I think Mariya is out on vacation
currently).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112855
___
llvm-branch-co
https://github.com/AaronBallman updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112855
>From fb40fba6f9caf44a1e839525efdaebdf936c2934 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mariya Podchishchaeva
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 10:18:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Fix C23 constexpr crashes (#112708)
Before
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
