Re: [LMMS-devel] Possibility of implementing a graphical waveshaper

2014-02-07 Thread Vesa
I've been thinking about this, and I'd like to take a shot at implementing this. I'll probably be trying to look at other effect plugins and see how they're implemented for guidance. I'd like to know though, how exactly does the plugin discovery work in LMMS? Are there steps I need to do to get LM

[LMMS-devel] Autosave

2014-02-07 Thread Vesa
I know there's been talk about the autosave feature, and how important it is, and I agree, in the long run we should get that feature in working order. But until/unless we can stabilize the feature, I think it should be removed entirely from the final release. There's no point having it there if i

Re: [LMMS-devel] New scales, chords, etc icons

2014-02-07 Thread Vesa
On 02/08/2014 06:15 AM, John Serafino wrote: > Here's the next iteration, with two main points feedback would be > useful on, aside from general feedback. I like the flat shading I've > given them, but is that just me? I can shade them no problem if it is. > The second is that I wanted to leave the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mallets Art WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Vesa
On 02/08/2014 01:40 AM, Bill Y. wrote: > I decided to try and work with in the limitations of the plugin. Here > is the new art. > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwJ-TpACk7OsLVpacW0zRmhTRnc/edit?usp=sharing > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwJ-TpACk7OsMkc2d1dvVUx4aVE/edit?usp=sharing > https:

Re: [LMMS-devel] Mallets Art WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Bill Y.
I decided to try and work with in the limitations of the plugin. Here is the new art. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwJ-TpACk7OsLVpacW0zRmhTRnc/edit?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwJ-TpACk7OsMkc2d1dvVUx4aVE/edit?usp=sharing https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwJ-TpACk7OsWEpTNVRCNFB

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Bill Y.
This is the coolest info I didn't know. I just tested my newest mallets artwork, and sure enough it works! On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > Just as a general example - IMHO there's no neccessity to change a > plugin's appearance. A plugin ships with whatever appearance it

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> I think we need a sepseparate thread for this. Fair enough. Back on topic... Then. Here's the latest Audio File Processor GU (link)I: http://i.imgur.com/6tJ2HRJ.png -Tres -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Ap

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
I think we need a sepseparate thread for this. If everyone can provide me a list of pligins that you would like me to contact the maintainers and I shall gladly do so. On 7 Feb 2014 20:08, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > There have been breaking changes to AFP that should be fixed and Toby said > ear

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
There have been breaking changes to AFP that should be fixed and Toby said early in the conversation to contact the authors of those changes. I'm asking if you can get this communication to the developers? I'm not necessarily talking about newer versions, I'm talking about restoring something tha

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Im not saying pre 1.0.0 im wondering if all plugins should get a version bump for this release. Im sure newer versions would fix alot of interesting issues and improve overall performance. On 7 Feb 2014 17:57, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > Talking about fixing AFP prior to 1.0.0. so, yes, authors,

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
Talking about fixing AFP prior to 1.0.0. so, yes, authors, I suppose. On Feb 7, 2014 11:07 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > Tres are you talking about plugin authors? > On 7 Feb 2014 16:17, "Tres Finocchiaro" > wrote: > >> I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? >> >> AF

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time display widget

2014-02-07 Thread Vesa
On 02/07/2014 06:15 PM, Alexandre Almeida wrote: > The best solution to get correct time values when the tempo is > automated is to read the tempo at the cursor position from the > automation track. It is also interesting to update the tempo value > shown in the GUI. > Not that simple I'm afraid. W

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time display widget

2014-02-07 Thread Alexandre Almeida
The best solution to get correct time values when the tempo is automated is to read the tempo at the cursor position from the automation track. It is also interesting to update the tempo value shown in the GUI. Some other problems can also be fixed if the user is not allowed to change the tempo

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Jonathan Aquilina
Tres are you talking about plugin authors? On 7 Feb 2014 16:17, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote: > I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? > > AFP went from awesome (0.4.15) to slightly less awesome (0.9.9.0) > > I can file a bug but IMHO this should be of high priority for 1.0.0

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Yes there were changes but you have to ask the people who possibly broke it ;-) Without wanting to blame somebody: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/commits/stable-0.4/plugins/audio_file_processor Toby -- Managing the Performa

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I see. @Jonathan, are you in communication with these people? AFP went from awesome (0.4.15) to slightly less awesome (0.9.9.0) I can file a bug but IMHO this should be of high priority for 1.0.0 and I want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. :) -Tres --

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
@Toby, Slightly off-topic, but were there any changes to the AFP from 0.4.15 that never made it into the 0.9.9.0 RC? The knobs behave strangely in 0.9.9.0 rc when working with the waveform and should be fixed prior to 1.0.0. I don't remember having this problem in 0.4.15. To reproduce, simply t

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Just as a general example - IMHO there's no neccessity to change a plugin's appearance. A plugin ships with whatever appearance it has been given by its author (usually). But maybe things are different for LMMS' own plugins. If you look at https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/blob/stable-0.4/src/gui/embed.

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio Coppola
Since when FL Studio is limitating the flexibility of LMMS? :( 2014-02-07 Tobias Doerffel : > Can you change the appearance of VST plugins in FL Studio? :-) > > Toby > -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applicati

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tobias Doerffel
Can you change the appearance of VST plugins in FL Studio? :-) Toby -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http:

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Emilio Coppola
I would love to have the chance of changing the design of the plugins, not adding this will make no theming sense 2014-02-07 Vesa : > On 02/07/2014 08:40 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > Just a question. > > > > 1) Nice work Tres :) > > 2) will all instruments and plugins end up themable like th

Re: [LMMS-devel] AudioFileProcessor WIP

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
> Eh, rather go with the blue. Blue versus Orange: -- Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doublecl

Re: [LMMS-devel] Possibility of implementing a graphical waveshaper

2014-02-07 Thread Tres Finocchiaro
I'm a bit overwhelmed and under-qualified to speak on behalf of this enhancement, but what you describe sounds very logical. I had to look up the youtube video (here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vf0xXW3Z4ho) and I still am a bit perplexed as to the use case of this. -Tres - tres.finocchi...@g