install that as that is like updates to the virus db and spyware db for
security essentials. Have you tried scanning with another anti virus as it
could be a false positive.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:57 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> The update manager shows me one Microsoft Security Essentia
I think and this is just a suggestion, but if and when you have this
compiled for mac I think it should be released as a beta at this point with
the goal to get other things such as OpulenZ working for 1.1 or even before
that. We need to make sure to keep version numbers the same across all
platfor
@Vesa,
I'll get to the artwork next week.
If you end up ahead of me and already start arranging knobs and buttons
before the artwork gets updated, just send me a screenshot. :)
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
--
@Toby,
Thanks kindly. 77%:
I'm guessing this next message suggests the OpulenZ code has some
compatibility issues with clang as well:
Linking CXX shared module libOPL2.so
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
>"_OPL_CALC_CH", referenced from:
> _YM3812UpdateOne in fmopl.o
>
As previously planned, I'm starting my work to implement better looping
in AFP (that is to say: actual loop points, in addition to sample start
and end, so that you can have a beginning part, a loop part, and a
release part). This also means that instead of loops being off/on, there
will be three m
On 03/26/2014 02:49 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
Quoting Tres Finocchiaro :
I noticed 1.0 dumping core on exit, is that what you're talking about?
Yes.
Had the same behavior with a self-built 1.0, too.
I didn't recall this behavior, but I would have to rebuild/retest to know
for sure.
OK, t
Quoting Tres Finocchiaro :
>>
>> I noticed 1.0 dumping core on exit, is that what you're talking about?
>>
> Yes.
>
>
>> Had the same behavior with a self-built 1.0, too.
>
> I didn't recall this behavior, but I would have to rebuild/retest to know
> for sure.
OK, turns out I've for some reason m
On 03/26/2014 08:50 PM, Tres
Finocchiaro wrote:
I... think you're possibly misunderstanding
something.
Correct. Please disregard that comment, I thought you
@Israel, I'm sorry, but what exactly do you need testing? (should I install
something?)
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Israel wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 12:05 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> > Quoting Tres Finocchiaro :
> >> Some notes:
> >> 3. The 12.04 core dump
>
> I... think you're possibly misunderstanding something.
>
Correct. Please disregard that comment, I thought you were suggesting
something like this...
[image: Inline image 1]
A couple more pixels of horizontal space isn't a big deal.
This statement is based the size of the existing LED grap
You could have an option in that tools menu that says
Fx ->1
2
3
etc...
For a quick solution.
And have a More option once it gets past something large (12? maybe 20?)
I suppose finding out how may FX people usually use.
I think that would be fairly easy... but adding
On 03/26/2014 12:05 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Quoting Tres Finocchiaro :
>> Some notes:
>> 3. The 12.04 core dump/error report still exists for this build
> I noticed 1.0 dumping core on exit, is that what you're talking about?
> Had the same behavior with a self-built 1.0, too.
>
So this is a bu
On 03/26/2014 07:13 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote:
> Maybe put the fx channel selection in the tool menu, along with the
> "delete track" function and whatever?
That would kind of defeat the point. The point is to have it easily &
quickly accessible, not having to click through subwindows or context
On 03/26/2014 06:32 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> Great! I think this would take a few minutes of clicking for every track!
> Would be good to have a switch for this in the Preferences window (so
> those who want so save some screen space, can hide these controls).
We already have the switch for "com
On 03/26/2014 07:09 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> I don't want to be the naysayer here, but I do have two issues with
> this approach
>
> 1. Uses even more valuable real-estate from the song editor
Everyone uses widescreens these days. A couple more pixels of horizontal
space isn't a big deal. We
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> @tres that is where you are wrong apple's aac format is their way of
> calling it mp4
>
AAC is a particular type of MPEG-4 audio. Yo used the generic term "MP4",
the file extension commonly used for video + audio. I believe M4A is wh
Maybe put the fx channel selection in the tool menu, along with the
"delete track" function and whatever?
Another thing to consider could be dropping the tool button and moving
that menu (with "rename track" as a context menu to the track name?
Quoting Tobiasz Karon :
> Great! I think this w
>
> I noticed 1.0 dumping core on exit, is that what you're talking about?
>
Yes.
> Had the same behavior with a self-built 1.0, too.
I didn't recall this behavior, but I would have to rebuild/retest to know
for sure.
-Tres
---
I don't want to be the naysayer here, but I do have two issues with this
approach
1. Uses even more valuable real-estate from the song editor
2. Is not particularly useful for a BB Editor pattern that uses more than
one style instrument.
It would be nice to raise the volume of an entire BB patt
Quoting Tres Finocchiaro :
> Some notes:
> 3. The 12.04 core dump/error report still exists for this build
I noticed 1.0 dumping core on exit, is that what you're talking about?
Had the same behavior with a self-built 1.0, too.
--
ra...@iki.fi
softrabbit on #lmms
-
The update manager shows me one Microsoft Security Essential [Important]
update.
Win7 SP1 64bit
Firefox 27.0.1 (now that I've updated it, it's version 28)
Il 26/03/2014 17:25, Jonathan Aquilina ha scritto:
Is windows fully up to date and your browser too?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:10 PM, gi
Great! I think this would take a few minutes of clicking for every track!
Would be good to have a switch for this in the Preferences window (so those
who want so save some screen space, can hide these controls).
2014-03-26 16:49 GMT+01:00 Israel :
> Yes!!
> Awesome idea!
>
> On 03/26/2014 10:34
I mean, It would *save* *me* a few minutes of clicking for every track :D
2014-03-26 17:32 GMT+01:00 Tobiasz Karoń :
> Great! I think this would take a few minutes of clicking for every track!
> Would be good to have a switch for this in the Preferences window (so
> those who want so save some s
Is windows fully up to date and your browser too?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:10 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> It may not sound like it. But, unfortunately, it just happened again,
> after having cleared my cache.
> Same virus. Doing a search, it happens to be a trojan related to DDoS
> attack
It may not sound like it. But, unfortunately, it just happened again,
after having cleared my cache.
Same virus. Doing a search, it happens to be a trojan related to DDoS
attacks, but I'm not the right person to say it.
http://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/threat/encyclopedia/entry.aspx?Name
Yes!!
Awesome idea!
On 03/26/2014 10:34 AM, Vesa wrote:
> By track widget, I mean the "title strip" in the song/bb editors, at the
> left side of the actual track.
>
> We already have vol/pan knobs there, even though those are also
> duplicated in the instrument track window. And it's good! They'r
By track widget, I mean the "title strip" in the song/bb editors, at the
left side of the actual track.
We already have vol/pan knobs there, even though those are also
duplicated in the instrument track window. And it's good! They're very
convenient for quickly adjusting the volumes/pannings of in
No problem hope it helps you solve the issue on 12.04
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Israel wrote:
> Ah... that may be why 12.04 has the issues...
> I will look into it, thanks!
>
> On 03/26/2014 09:29 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
>
> Look at the ia32 removal and the use of multilib. I dont
Ah... that may be why 12.04 has the issues...
I will look into it, thanks!
On 03/26/2014 09:29 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Look at the ia32 removal and the use of multilib. I dont remember if
12.04 uses ia32libs which i think it does and anything after that it
uses the new multilib stuff.
O
@tres that is where you are wrong apple's aac format is their way of
calling it mp4
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina > wrote:
>
>> what about mp4 is that still a proprietary format as we
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Jonathan Aquilina
wrote:
> what about mp4 is that still a proprietary format as well?
>
>From wikipedia:
> MPEG-4 contains patented technologies, the use of which requires licensing
> in countries that acknowledge software algorithm patents
So no, MP4 would sti
Look at the ia32 removal and the use of multilib. I dont remember if 12.04
uses ia32libs which i think it does and anything after that it uses the new
multilib stuff.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Israel wrote:
> 64bit Ubuntu still will not have VST support it has been missing for
> qui
64bit Ubuntu still will not have VST support it has been missing for
quite some time.
I am not entirely sure how to FORCE it to work.
If 32bit does not have VST/wine that is a huge problem.
I am unsure why 12.04 has a core dump. It may be that there are some
recommends I need to tweak in or
On 03/26/2014 02:57 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 26 March 2014 12:54, Israel wrote:
>
>> There are some very old mp3 players that don't support OGG, but most support
>> it now, because it is a free encoder (doesn't require licensing fees).
>
> This is incorrect. Fraunhofer was charging more to com
@Israel,
I've added `ppa:israeldahl/test-this-one-please` to a Dell pre-loaded
install of 12.04.
The good:
1. I did not receive any warnings doing the install.
Some notes:
1. The name still says "Linux Multimedia Studio"
2. The icon does not display in the Ubuntu Package Manager
3. The 12.04 cor
On 03/26/2014 02:59 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> Wow, this looks great! I love the knob design and overall look.
> Looks like a powerful little machine and totally profesional GUI design!
>
> How about name: *Wrak or Vrak?*
>
> (in Polish "wrak" means "wreckage", with rust and stuff)
>
Thanks, but a
what about mp4 is that still a proprietary format as well?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Tres Finocchiaro <
tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> MP3 export would be a big win for reasons David suggested (it work by
> default on Windows), but with Soundcloud, this hasn't been much of an issue
On 26 March 2014 13:32, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> In terms of MP3 support though, it is the importing of MP3s that would
> become most useful to LMMS form my experience. Many sample packs are
> offered using MP3 compression by default. Many remix competitions use MP3
> compression by default.
Quoting Israel :
> It is built for 12.04 (please test 64bit if you have it)
> 13.10( any arch testing appreciated)
> 14.04 (32 bit especially!)
12.04, 64 bit, upgrade from 0.4.15. (or 0.9.92 if you ask my
lmmsrc.xml :) Now that I think about it, that earlier version was from
some PPA, but that
MP3 export would be a big win for reasons David suggested (it work by
default on Windows), but with Soundcloud, this hasn't been much of an issue
for our group, as soundcloud supports OGG. It became more of an issue when
we enabled downloads from Soundcloud for a specific track and some of our
fan
On 26 March 2014 12:54, Israel wrote:
> There are some very old mp3 players that don't support OGG, but most support
> it now, because it is a free encoder (doesn't require licensing fees).
This is incorrect. Fraunhofer was charging more to companies who
included Ogg than didn't, so many left i
Israel one place I have not see ogg supported yet but things could have
changed are some cdj mixers. they seem to like audio in mp3 format.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Israel wrote:
> Personally I think OGG is far superior to mp3 anyhow. It works on
> everything I have ever tried, and is
On 03/26/2014 07:47 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 26 March 2014 12:41, Israel wrote:
>
>> Personally I think OGG is far superior to mp3 anyhow. It works on
>> everything I have ever tried, and is generally cleaner sounding and can
>> often be smaller.
>
> It does *not* work on Windows for playback
What is the difference between LAME and FFMPEG
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> I think MP3 support would be nice for convenience (and backward
> compatibility with some folks), as some people and devices (especially
> older portable MP3 players) don't support Ogg yet.
>
I suppose that would be fine. Fluendo provides a legal version for use
on Ubuntu (just like their DVD program). fortunately the mp3 part works
much better than the DVD program.
So it would be good to look for fluendo as well... though that may
simply be for playback and not encoding though
On 26 March 2014 12:41, Israel wrote:
> Personally I think OGG is far superior to mp3 anyhow. It works on
> everything I have ever tried, and is generally cleaner sounding and can
> often be smaller.
It does *not* work on Windows for playback by default. mp3 does. So if
I put stuff up for othe
I think MP3 support would be nice for convenience (and backward
compatibility with some folks), as some people and devices (especially
older portable MP3 players) don't support Ogg yet.
Maybe we could do it as Audacity does - if the system has installed LAME,
then LMMS can use it to encoe to MP3,
On 26 March 2014 12:09, Vesa wrote:
> We could of course provide optional dependency against ffmpeg and leave
> the choice of installing it or not to the user, like some other
> softwares do. But we still couldn't ship ffmpeg with LMMS, and that
> means there still wouldn't be mp3 support on wind
Personally I think OGG is far superior to mp3 anyhow. It works on
everything I have ever tried, and is generally cleaner sounding and can
often be smaller.
I really see no reason to support mp3 as it takes away freedom and adds
nothing noticeable. The only caveat I can see is that the user may
>
> We could of course provide optional dependency against ffmpeg and leave
> the choice of installing it or not to the user
I would be a proponent of this idea.
that means there still wouldn't be mp3 support on windows
FYI - Lame actually offers a very specific installer for Audacity called
"L
On 03/26/2014 12:33 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> in regards to mp3 support. what is ffmpeg then? is that a reverse
> engineered open source equivalent to mp3?
>
No it's not. AFAIK there's no need to reverse-engineer anything with
mp3, the spec is public and that's not the problem. The problem is
That doesnt sound like its the problem of the wiki. did you clear your
browser cache and see if it happens again?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:19 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> Yeah I also would like to have access to the wiki...
>
> By the way, opening that page I got both Avira and Microsoft Se
in regards to mp3 support. what is ffmpeg then? is that a reverse
engineered open source equivalent to mp3?
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:13 PM, Vesa wrote:
> On 03/25/2014 11:02 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> > I took it for granted that the devs knew about that option. Actually I
> > thought LMMS
Hi,
sorry for the noise. I wasn't aware of how LMMS determines the plugin
directory when writing you a few days back. When LIB_DIR is specified
explicitely upon invoking CMake, the specified path will compiled into
the LMMS binary and thus the previous build settings (files in
/usr/lib//lmms) shou
Hi,
please try again with latest stable-1.0 branch.
Toby
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
applications. Written by three ac
55 matches
Mail list logo
