Re: [LMMS-devel] Odd bug: envelope settings on instruments that don't use it

Adding envelope ability to sf2 would be very good though. Maybe this is a way to finally get a vol envelope on sf2 on linux! On Apr 27, 2014 1:46 AM, "David Gerard" wrote: > On 26 April 2014 22:34, Vesa wrote: > > > The reason is simple: it's a single-stream instrument. The envelope thus > > wou

Re: [LMMS-devel] JUCE

27.04.2014 9:03, Tres Finocchiaro ?: Toby/et.al I came across this today looking for some Mavericks specific bug recommendations. Wanted to share the link as previously I hadn't heard of it. http://www.juce.com/about-juce It seems to specialize in cross-platform graphics

[LMMS-devel] JUCE

Toby/et.al I came across this today looking for some Mavericks specific bug recommendations. Wanted to share the link as previously I hadn't heard of it. http://www.juce.com/about-juce It seems to specialize in cross-platform graphics and audio and may be of benefit at some point of the project

Re: [LMMS-devel] Odd bug: envelope settings on instruments that don't use it

On 26 April 2014 22:34, Vesa wrote: > The reason is simple: it's a single-stream instrument. The envelope thus > would know nothing of the notes played and can't separate the notes from > each other. Try it yourself - repeat your steps so that you get the > envelope on a SF2 instrument, then try

Re: [LMMS-devel] Odd bug: envelope settings on instruments that don't use it

On 04/27/2014 12:06 AM, David Gerard wrote: > So I was working on something, shuffling instruments in and out. I had > one sound that was a sample in AFP, with an envelope defined. I wanted > an SF2 sound, so I dragged SF2 on top and it switched to that. All > good ... except the envelope was clear

[LMMS-devel] Odd bug: envelope settings on instruments that don't use it

So I was working on something, shuffling instruments in and out. I had one sound that was a sample in AFP, with an envelope defined. I wanted an SF2 sound, so I dragged SF2 on top and it switched to that. All good ... except the envelope was clearly still affecting it. And I no longer had a way to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

i propose to make it as vote here you can set +1 , edit or share it https://pad.riseup.net/p/lmms.org maybe it will last for a week or just a sunday maybe the list of names can be hidden, so everybody could vote just for number or few letters with actual list being hidden (if lmms-devel list i

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

What do you guys think of lmms.center ? It's available for 19€/y and it would fit perfectly to the plans for its content. Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Jonathan Aquilina Gesendet: 26. April 2014 20:55:32 MESZ An: bubblegummer Betreff: Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain! TBH I

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

TV is for another country but people use it for television sites etc. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do like "pidgin.im" name. I think that's a creative URL and I don't > think it makes it any harder to remember, but they chose this dur

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

I think for now I will push that resid stays as is. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Quoting Tres Finocchiaro : > > Gentoo was questioning fundamentally whether or not the source of this > > package *should* even be bundled to begin with, or rather be a dependency > > th

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

Quoting Tres Finocchiaro : > Gentoo was questioning fundamentally whether or not the source of this > package *should* even be bundled to begin with, or rather be a dependency > that the original source package provides. Sorry Lukas, I get it now. :) > > The changes seem to be specific to muting (

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

I do like "pidgin.im" name. I think that's a creative URL and I don't think it makes it any harder to remember, but they chose this during a rename, something we never managed to do. (.IM was originally created for the Isle of Man but has since started being used by Yahoo and Trillian, same thing

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Ok, that's your opinion, I don't share it but I understand you. Nevertheless, IIRC makefreemusic was not accepted that much, and I myself will not support it because of several reasons that have already been stated by me and by others. Also, as far as I can recall, when Toby asked "What's wrong wit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

On 04/26/2014 08:01 PM, oeai wrote: > Well, for me > > .org is for organisations > .com for communities .com is for commercial entities, ie. businesses. -- Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform Build yo

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Well, for me .org is for organisations .com for communities .net for networks .io for input-ouput or whatever basic stuff .pro for projects / professionals nobody knows about many .com and .net sites and it's not the matter of not using .org if it wasn't a matter of domainbullies i'd put this t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

> > The domains you suggested all sound nice, but rather sound like community > sites, instead of official ones. I think we need something more serious. This is the major decision I'm referring to. If we just want a business card site, then fine, let's buy a "professional" domain and place our "

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

On Apr 26, Tres wrote: > He never said that. He actually liked it, but that's besides the point. On Feb 20, Toby wrote: > the suggested makefreemusic.org […] implies that you have to make free music > with LMMS (which is not true) The domains you suggested all sound nice, but rather sound like

Re: [LMMS-devel] Building LMMS for OSX

For those interested, here is a YouTube video with 1.0.0 running on OSX: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paRYL7abTqI#t=98 - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > For those interested, I have a new Mac build availabl

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

I'm sorry. Gentoo was questioning fundamentally whether or not the source of this package *should* even be bundled to begin with, or rather be a dependency that the original source package provides. Sorry Lukas, I get it now. :) The changes seem to be specific to muting (LMMS specific), sampling

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

> > If it's the same as the one shipped with Gentoo, it would be pointless > to have it twice in the release. That's why they are asking us if our > version has lmms-specific changes or if they can safely remove it and > use the shipped one instead. For this, they provided us with a diff > between

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

> > makefreemusic.org was disliked by quite some people, especially by Toby, > and was dropped. He never said that. He actually liked it, but that's besides the point. Tobias Doerffel Jan 31 to > tres.finocchi...@gmail.com makefreemusic.org sounds good :-) I'd like to ask everyone to thin

Re: [LMMS-devel] threads...

On 04/26/2014 03:50 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > Wouldnt something like a mixer with each channel having its own thread? AFAIK, no. Thread count should be optimized to the system, too many threads just loses performance. --

Re: [LMMS-devel] threads...

> > I'm not very familiar with threads so I might be way off here, but seems > to me that in FxMixer, we go through all of the channels in a recursive > function just to add them on the job queue - and we do this every > period. Additionally it seems (I could be wrong as I'm not sure how the > queu

Re: [LMMS-devel] threads...

Wouldnt something like a mixer with each channel having its own thread? On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Vesa wrote: > I'm a bit all over the place with these questions lately, but bear with > me... > > I'm not very familiar with threads so I might be way off here, but seems > to me that in FxM

Re: [LMMS-devel] Debian progress

I know you have been rather hard on yourself for this mistake, but we all make them, but we pick up the pieces and move forward to ensure that things dont end up stagnant. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Israel wrote: > Hi, I am not putting myself down about it. I was actually being quite >

[LMMS-devel] threads...

I'm a bit all over the place with these questions lately, but bear with me... I'm not very familiar with threads so I might be way off here, but seems to me that in FxMixer, we go through all of the channels in a recursive function just to add them on the job queue - and we do this every period. A

Re: [LMMS-devel] Debian progress

Hi, I am not putting myself down about it. I was actually being quite positive. I am glad that my efforts have done more good than I originally intended, even though I accidentally contributed the wrong version to Ubuntu, Debian now has the right version. I know the problem, for sure. But soldie

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Lukas what about lmms.proj as was earlier suggested. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Lukas W. wrote: > Hmm, lmms.io is growing on me. I think I'm starting to favor it over > lmms-project.org. It's short, .io is getting more and more popular and > is used a lot by software projects and a very e

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Hmm, lmms.io is growing on me. I think I'm starting to favor it over lmms-project.org. It's short, .io is getting more and more popular and is used a lot by software projects and a very easy to remember. It's a bit geeky though, but ey, aren't we as well? Oh, and it is around 5x the price (>40€/y),

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

On 04/26/2014 11:32 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > I think .pro is far too uncommon, and thus too difficult to remember. > .io has this problem as well, but it's not that bad as with .pro. Heh, the age of easily-remembered, standard set of tld's is just about over... just wait until we start getting corpor

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Agreed I really like the .org one that you mentioned. When and if we setup a proper foundation, it will have a professional name and people will know its a formal organization On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > Of course we can always do this, but we have to decide on a single

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Of course we can always do this, but we have to decide on a single official main domain. 2014-04-26 10:34 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Aquilina : > Lukas we can do a redirect to the .org address with either of those. > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Lukas W. wrote: >> >> I think .pro is far too unco

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

Lukas we can do a redirect to the .org address with either of those. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > I think .pro is far too uncommon, and thus too difficult to remember. > .io has this problem as well, but it's not that bad as with .pro. > > 2014-04-26 9:47 GMT+02:00 oeai :

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

I think .pro is far too uncommon, and thus too difficult to remember. .io has this problem as well, but it's not that bad as with .pro. 2014-04-26 9:47 GMT+02:00 oeai : > maybe lmms.pro ? > > On 26.04.2014 11:24, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: >> +1 for lmms-project.org and hav

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

maybe lmms.pro ? On 26.04.2014 11:24, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > +1 for lmms-project.org and having a .org > domain is good if eventually we want to setup a foundation or something. > > @lukas thanks for willing to sponsor the domain. I guess my other > thread can be igno

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

oops im going to forward the below to them. What do you all think about lmms.pro On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:59 AM, oeai wrote: > my message didn't get on devel-list yet > > On 26.04.2014 11:57, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > >> Nice. I would get that as the 2nd domain instead of lmms.io < >> http:/

Re: [LMMS-devel] Debian progress

@israel, I dont know why you keep putting yourself down on this. The community appreciates the work you have done for this, as well as a person you have grown and learnt alot about packaging. I will be honest anyone could have made that mistake for 14.04. The problem is That 1.0 was released rathe

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

Thanks for that Lukas. I couldnt have said it any better myself :D @Tres I am not sure if it was you or Vesa who said to run a diff on the original source code and the version we ship to see what the differences are and this person did that for us. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Lukas W. wrot

Re: [LMMS-devel] resid on gentoo

Tres wrote: > Why would anyone go through this work when the one bundled is just fine? If it's the same as the one shipped with Gentoo, it would be pointless to have it twice in the release. That's why they are asking us if our version has lmms-specific changes or if they can safely remove it and

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

i would still recommend the .org address and if you want with lmms.io a redirect can be setup to the .org domain On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Lukas W. wrote: > @Jonathan > Let's talk about hosting somewhere else, this should be only about the > domain ;-) > > I, just like Vesa, understood t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

@Jonathan Let's talk about hosting somewhere else, this should be only about the domain ;-) I, just like Vesa, understood that makefreemusic.org was disliked by quite some people, especially by Toby, and was dropped. The domain really should contain the word LMMS, and I guess we're sticking with t

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

+1 for lmms-project.org and having a .org domain is good if eventually we want to setup a foundation or something. @lukas thanks for willing to sponsor the domain. I guess my other thread can be ignored in regards to me having someone else willing to sponsor it. On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:15 PM,

Re: [LMMS-devel] Time for a domain!

With the CMS I have chose it will be very easy to make a really amazing site and even have an easy way to manage lsp all from a single location. On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the domain name needs to at least contain LMMS >> > >