Yes, I have recently succeeded in building lmms for windows. I could do a
test build if its needed.
On 21 May 2014 03:44, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote:
>
>
> If you want to build binary packages from the branch, you're entirely
>> free and welcome to do so. Just remember to note anyone using/trying
If you want to build binary packages from the branch, you're entirely
> free and welcome to do so. Just remember to note anyone using/trying the
> binaries that it's not an official release and only exists for testing
> purposes.
>
I can (and will if needed) but the platform I've documented creati
On 05/21/2014 03:26 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> You probably won't want to hear this, but if the team can churn out
> binary builds of the sample exact stuff you're likely to get much
> quicker feedback. Particularly the Ubuntu and Windows sides of the
> fence.
>
>
If you want to build binary p
You probably won't want to hear this, but if the team can churn out binary
builds of the sample exact stuff you're likely to get much quicker
feedback. Particularly the Ubuntu and Windows sides of the fence.
-Tres
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 6:36 PM, Vesa wrote:
> I'
I'd like to note here, that it'd be extremely helpful if people who are
capable of compiling from source would test out the sample-exact models
branch a bit, if we can get some testing and find out any possible
problems in it, then there might be a higher chance that we could get
this feature stabl
Hi,
2014-05-20 0:24 GMT+02:00 Vesa :
> There seems to be a bug with note stacking - the base note is silent. Is
> anyone else noticing this?
>
thanks for finding and reporting the bug. I just fixed the issue in
bfe2f0cf1125c4b1e20a472cc7d01f26e0a5.
Toby
-
>
> *Definitely*. I've wanted that to be an always-on-top window before.
> Is there a case for it not being one?
>
Assuming QMdiArea support it... :)
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-4.8/qmdiarea.html
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles
On 20 May 2014 18:02, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> This is a bit off topic, but there are certain windows that would benefit
> from an "always on top" option. The mixer and the spectrum analyzer are two
> I feel fall into this category.
*Definitely*. I've wanted that to be an always-on-top window
> Buut, how can you open fxp and fxb in LMMS? If LMMS is going to support
> the files in the future, then why not add the file extensions now.
I just tried it and it crashed the software. I'm not sure, I'm just
putting this question out there for people who may use other file
extensions.
Is dr
Is drag'n' drop already possible for samples (.wav etc)?
Awesome things are happening to LMMS! :)
On 20. Mai 2014 17:56:42 MESZ, "Stian Jørgensrud" wrote:
]Buut, how can you open fxp and fxb in LMMS? If LMMS is going to support
]the
]files in the future, then why not add the file extensions now
>
> And better example: If I only want to watch the master while playing, at
> the same time as I want to see as much of the Song Editor as I can.
This is a bit off topic, but there are certain windows that would benefit
from an "always on top" option. The mixer and the spectrum analyzer are
two
On 05/20/2014 07:11 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote:
> I understand your idea, but I don't think it will be more obvious for users
> that they need to fill the blank area with FX channels. You could have some
> text saying "add FX channel here", however I think the biggest button in
> LMMS 1.1.0, "add"
On 05/20/2014 07:09 PM, musikbear wrote:
> Imo a lot in the current pages are still valid, and 'just' need 'some'
> ajustments. + new imagery! -i have already thrown my 10 cent there, buuut a
> good thing should be repeated :p :Central ImageDB!
>
>
You can already upload images directly on the wi
I understand your idea, but I don't think it will be more obvious for users
that they need to fill the blank area with FX channels. You could have some
text saying "add FX channel here", however I think the biggest button in
LMMS 1.1.0, "add" fx channel, will make users realize how it works pretty
Jonathan Aquilina wrote
> Cant they just be tagged as outdated or something of the sort? That way we
> dont need to delete them. that is how the ubuntu community help wiki does
> it.
Build a static pdf and keep that as history-reference? I believe tools
exists for that op??
But its more like -who
Buut, how can you open fxp and fxb in LMMS? If LMMS is going to support the
files in the future, then why not add the file extensions now.
Tres Finocchiaro wrote
> My question is, are there some more file extensions we should add to this?
> (i.e. *.fxp*, *.fxb*? Any others?)
>
> Here's VST and
>
> No that's not necessary, I can just do them later when I get around to it.
>
Ok great, I'll default to the musical notice icon that we're using for
samples until this has been addressed.
So at this point, once I get some feedback on which file extensions to add
I'll go ahead and make the comm
On 05/20/2014 04:33 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> Also, @Vesa, would you like any new artwork (i.e. VST file icon) for
> this to be part of the commit? If so, would you be willing to send me
> the artwork so that it is all part of the same pull request?
No that's not necessary, I can just do th
It turns out it is only a few lines of code to turn on drag-and-drop
support for new file types. (assuming they are already supported by an
existing instrument of course).
Enabling this has been a long time wish of mine. The two I plan to enable
are **.dll* and **.sf2*.
My question is, are there
I was about to start setting up the features Tres said we need, and in
terms of the websites I think I am going to hold off on setting that up as
I need to specify a domain. I believe we can use a subdomain of
tuxfamily.org but im not sure if it can be change. I will keep everyone
posted on this.
20 matches
Mail list logo
