Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

On Jul 19, 2014 7:32 AM, "Jonathan Aquilina" wrote: > > I never noticed that. All im seeing is that everything is GPL free doc licensed no mention of copyright I'm not sure how this works but LucasW and Stian has some good conversations about it. Since we don't force our wiki authors to agree to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

Hey, I am quite confused myself. This licence is perhaps only the LMMS program licence? http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/License So yeah, only GPL licence, if you copy the pages and have the same licence on those pages you are good. Jonathan Aquilina wrote > I never noticed that. All im

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.092 mixer and using it

I would definitely Luke being able to send my dry and wet signals to different places. Maybe they default to being linked, but you can unlink them and a secondary channel selector would light up to send the wet Sig Al elsewhere. On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:27 AM, musikbear wrot

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.092 mixer and using it

Tres Finocchiaro wrote > Can you draw a flow chart of > what you are illustrating? well il try :p We have an instrument 'I', on FX-channel (fxc) 1 (a) 'I' sends the *dry* signal to fxc-1 (b) fxc1 sends the *d

Re: [LMMS-devel] 1.092 mixer and using it

Are you talking about the ability to send both a modified and an unmodified version of a channel to different channels? Can you draw a flow chart of what you are illustrating? -- Want fast and easy access to all the code i

Re: [LMMS-devel] sfxr is out of tune

Thx. Filing a bug is probably sufficient. Making two discussion points probably isn't necessary. :) -- Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free

[LMMS-devel] 1.092 mixer and using it

I have read up on mixers, partly to understand the architecture, and also to write something for wiki, but i have some nags with current mixer Take a look http://snag.gy/zujJN.jpg Here user has an instrument routed to FX1 This instrument is then routed to fx2 and fx3 fx2 has a plat-fx and fx3 has

[LMMS-devel] sfxr is out of tune

Here's the issue: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1010 -- Tobiasz *unfa* -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.1 GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L+++>$ E? W++>$ !N-? !o--? K-? !w-- O? !M-- V? PS++ PE++ !Y+ !PGP+? !t(+) 5? !X !R+ tv b+>+++ DI>+ D+ G e h-->- !r y

Re: [LMMS-devel] Can't render or play a project - infinitely loud nothing

I've just updated to 1.0.3 (thanks to FalkTX for updating the KX Studio repos). The problems seem to be GONE! :D 2014-07-18 16:40 GMT+02:00 Tobiasz Karoń : > Seems like SFXR is not guilty. > The problem came back after it was removed from the project. > > > 2014-07-18 16:26 GMT+02:00 Tobiasz Ka

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS artwork

On 07/19/2014 02:34 PM, Juan Fabián wrote: > Oh crap, my version of LMMS is very old :( I need an update! > > Fine, i'll take a look at > http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Creating_a_Theme Just note that theme compability was broken in 1.0, so themes made prior to 1.0 are not compatible w

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS artwork

Oh crap, my version of LMMS is very old :( I need an update! Fine, i'll take a look at http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Creating_a_Theme 2014-07-18 13:00 GMT+02:00 Vesa : > On 07/18/2014 01:47 PM, Juan Fabián wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > i made the artwork for some of the plugins. I ha

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

/..all those wiki's makes me wacky.. / Link all you like to my youtubes :) https://www.youtube.com/user/bearsoundz Say if a topic should have a video, and i make it (no wide-scren/ currently on xp -so content over apearences :) -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmm

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

I never noticed that. All im seeing is that everything is GPL free doc licensed no mention of copyright On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Maybe those wikis were hosted wiki apps (cause SF had that?), while our > wiki > is a mediawiki site hosted by SourceForge. You can

Re: [LMMS-devel] Top Level Domain: Final decision

Juan Fabián Simón wrote > Bt, i have to say: i love the software, i hate the name. I was one of > those who suggested new names in the past, sadly it didn't change. oooh its not a question of /low grade imagination/, but protecting the *Brand* Renaming was simply /no longer/ a good thing, LMM

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

Maybe those wikis were hosted wiki apps (cause SF had that?), while our wiki is a mediawiki site hosted by SourceForge. You can replicate it to anywhere you want, as long as everyone continue to use the same one. And please notice the wiki is copyrighted... I find it strange, but oh well. Jonatha

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

I am getting confused as some other mailing lists im on have lost their wiki. I am wondering if we should somehow replicate the wiki from SF onto tuxfamily to be safe. On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Yes we could. Good idea. Stop saying that the SF wiki is no more, it

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

Yes we could. Good idea. Stop saying that the SF wiki is no more, it will be around forever to hunt you in your dreams... Jonathan Aquilina wrote > Ok my bad. Do you guys think though we should link any tutorials or even > the youtube tutorials people are putting together on the SF wiki? --

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

Ok my bad. Do you guys think though we should link any tutorials or even the youtube tutorials people are putting together on the SF wiki? On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 07/19/2014 12:24 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > > The problem linking to the sourceforge wiki is that its

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

On 07/19/2014 12:24 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote: > The problem linking to the sourceforge wiki is that its no more if I > am not mistaken. Why though should we limit the wiki that is on > github for use for developers only. are you say we should setup on > tuxfamily another wiki? We have a user w

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

The problem linking to the sourceforge wiki is that its no more if I am not mistaken. Why though should we limit the wiki that is on github for use for developers only. are you say we should setup on tuxfamily another wiki? On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 11:08 AM, DeRobyJ wrote: > I agree! > But, th

Re: [LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

I agree! But, the github wiki isn't about explaining the program: it's intended to help developers, not users. Also, the "online help", thet is put in "Help" into lmms, links to the sourceforge wiki. Il 19/07/2014 09:37, Jonathan Aquilina ha scritto: Hey guys, I am aware alot of you guys ar

[LMMS-devel] Tutorials on Wiki

Hey guys, I am aware alot of you guys are doing tutorial videos on Youtube. I am wondering if we should have a section on the github wiki where we can link to the videos. In a nut shell it would be a centralized repository. -- Jonathan Aquilina ---