Re: [LMMS-devel] Let's release 1.1

> > A new stable-1.1 bug here in regards to recording MIDI: > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1464 False alarm. That was a confusion about stable-1.1 versus master branch. Bumped to 1.2 milestone. Any other bugs? :) - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Tres Finocc

Re: [LMMS-devel] Let's release 1.1

A new stable-1.1 bug here in regards to recording MIDI: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/1464 - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Tres Finocchiaro < tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Much obliged @musikBear. :) > > - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com > > On Thu, Dec

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

Thanks for the quick feedback guys. Consolidated. #1467 I decided to put the ALSA-JACK one in there too to tidy things up a bit more... @unfa feel free to reopen that on its own if you determine its is still valid and unrelated to our internal JACK supp

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

On 12/19/2014 11:49 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > No comment on in/outputs. Transport support is probably not a huge > thing to add when the single tempo track changes are done, locating to > an absolute time should be possible. Yep. > Locating to bar/beat/tick might > be a bit trickier wit

Re: [LMMS-devel] Better JACK support

> On 12/19/2014 04:10 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > Does anyone object to me wrapping the open bugs into a single bug > report so that they can be addressed as a WIP when the opportunity arises? > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/276 Maybe not a JACK problem: "I changed to JACK and re-tried. T