>
> > I understand that things will break/shift around/change, but dropping
> > existing
> projects seems like throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
Vesa said he was going to break backwards compatibility for 2.0 and there
has been an overwhelming amount of push-back on that statement.
What
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 21:57 -0200, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:58:06PM -0500, Phil (list) wrote:
> > 1) Offering a lint check of sorts when opening an existing file that
> > would flag (either a dialog pop or writing out a log file) things that
> > aren't compatible giving th
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:58:06PM -0500, Phil (list) wrote:
> 1) Offering a lint check of sorts when opening an existing file that
> would flag (either a dialog pop or writing out a log file) things that
> aren't compatible giving the user an indication of what is going to
> break and giving them
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:31:38PM +, David Gerard wrote:
> On 28 January 2015 at 22:58, Phil (list) wrote:
>
> > Not yet having an understanding of what sort of cruft is involved, I
> > have no idea if the effort involved in doing this is worth it. But
> > dropping compatibility for existin
On 28 January 2015 at 22:58, Phil (list) wrote:
> Not yet having an understanding of what sort of cruft is involved, I
> have no idea if the effort involved in doing this is worth it. But
> dropping compatibility for existing work seems extreme.
Just picture the FB page when 2.0 is released a
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 17:00 -0500, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> What 2.0 represents is mostly conceptual.
>
> What 1.2 represents is mostly well defined.
>
>
> I tend to agree that if resources are thin on 2.0 we may want to focus
> on an interim milestone, but I also want to encourage the change
>
> I'll be happy just mindlessly fixing crashes and random enhancements, I just
> wanted to improve the communication and try to create a sense of union
> and maybe a team. In my experience having isolated developers working on
> huge features without any constant communication is an issue and bad
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:56 -0500, Phil (list) wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:42 -0500, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> > Hmm
> >
> >
> > I think it uses a mailman service which sourceforge admins should have
> > **some** administrative access to. These guys (picture attached)
> > would have t
On Wed, 2015-01-28 at 16:42 -0500, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
> Hmm
>
>
> I think it uses a mailman service which sourceforge admins should have
> **some** administrative access to. These guys (picture attached)
> would have the highest access to such an area:
>
>
>
>
>
> I have SSH acces
Thanks for the suggestion Umcaruje, I find the SF navigator terrible, I
can't see related emails from the same thread, the search, etc...
Gonna check it later.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:36:17PM +0100, I'm Umcaruje wrote:
> Nabble is a pretty neat way of viewing the mailing list, because it sorts
Hmm
I think it uses a mailman service which sourceforge admins should have
**some** administrative access to. These guys (picture attached) would
have the highest access to such an area:
I have SSH access if you find some supporting evidence that it will help.
I'm not aware of any other wa
Nabble is a pretty neat way of viewing the mailing list, because it sorts
it like a forum:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/lmms-devel-f3.html
It has old mails up to ~2006 IIRC, so I think you can find everything you
may need on it. :)
-Uroš|Umcaruje
On 28 January 2015 at
Is there any way to enable downloading of the mailing list archives?
(i.e. is there an admin option that can turn this on or is this
capability not available for sourceforge lists?) I ask because several
times people have referred to earlier conversations and I find the web
interface a clunky way
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 05:07:16PM +0200, Vesa wrote:
> The tags are morelike guidelines. Or aspirations... they're more like what we
> aim to get done for a given release, but it's very common for issues to get
> bumped ahead when they don't get addressed in time. So I advise not to stress
> too m
On 01/28/2015 08:35 AM, Amadeus Folego wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 07:45:47AM +0200, Vesa wrote:
>> As for the freeze, I think we talked of February before? Maybe a week or
>> two from now? Is anyone working on any big features right now?
> Well, I am not asking too much, my idea would be just
15 matches
Mail list logo
