On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:31:38PM +0000, David Gerard wrote: > On 28 January 2015 at 22:58, Phil (list) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Not yet having an understanding of what sort of cruft is involved, I > > have no idea if the effort involved in doing this is worth it. But > > dropping compatibility for existing work seems extreme. > > > > Just picture the FB page when 2.0 is released and people's old files > don't work at all. Will those users move to 2.0 or stick with 1.2?
If there are compelling reasons they'll move. Wouldn't you prefer starting a project on LMMS 2.0 if it has LV2 support? No crashes? A lot of usability improvements? Improved midi capabilities? Export individual FX Channels? Etc... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/ _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
